Community, Identity, Stability: Critical Essay on Brave New World

Introduction

The 'Community, Identity, Stability' quote from the book "The brave world" by Aldous Huxley is a motto that was used to list the World State Utopia's prime goals. The author uses to motto to show that the community stability has to be achieved through paying a certain sacrificial cost. The motto is utilized by the World States leadership on the World State citizens to imply how the World State has to sacrifice some aspects to attain the goal of community stability and identity. The three words are hanged on the Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Store for all citizens to abide by the sacrifices. The word community is used conjunctively with stability to imply that security of the society emanates and is built on the community. Also, the world identity is used on the motto, to imply that the identification of the distinct characteristics of the society makes the community's distinct identification. Moreover, a community results from stability and identity. On the other hand, stability is used to show it is an essential factor that is binding the community together. Therefore, the three keywords are used in the motto to imply that people living in one community, and identified by unique positive identity lead stable lives are a result of the stability emanating from the strong community identity.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Mustapha Mond: Implementing Sacrifices for Stability

The major character portraying the adherence of the motto is Mustapha Mond. The sacrifices that the Mustapha Mond has implemented and imposed on the citizens, in accordance with the World States motto, are not worth the price since taking away the citizens real feelings and emotional attachments do not directly influence the stability of the society. Mustapha calls for the adherence of the motto because he believes that stability translates to the communities' happiness and that all the unpleasant emotional attachments can be eradicated by sending away the stability disturbers to an island. He sees that for World State to succeed and maximize happiness, the community has to work together to promote the aspired stability goal. Mustapha responds to John Savage protests by asserting that the citizens have to choose between happiness and the high art of the World State. He calls for the people to strive hard and sacrifice the art and emotional attachments to attain the greatest amount of happiness. Mustapha imposes the sacrifices since he believes that what makes a person human and unique is the emotional attachment in their minds.

John Savage: Challenging the Dystopia

On the other hand, John is against the community stability strategy by claiming that the community should have love, passion, and strive for the truth. He is the major character representing many challenges to the Mustapha established dystopia. He considers the World State to be over civilized by the rulers' stability rules. He believes that consumerism is not worth replacing individual freedom, dignity, and integrity. John actions aim at challenging the Mustapha's community transformation by making efforts to stop the sacrifices and help the community in stifling humanity. However, John is unable to counter the rulers' strategy since he is blocked. Mustapha uses his power to resist the countering force of John. Despite John being against the civilized world, he has become conditioned as his free thinking is limited and ends up killing himself.

The end of the book shows how the sacrifices have resulted in stability and happiness of the community by having lesser conflicts and no war in the World States. The community is engineered by using Neo-Pavlovian methods to make children live and think the same, which is regarded as a sense of community by the leaders. The theme portrayed in the ending of the story is the incompatibility of happiness and truth. The rulers of the World State engineer the citizens to fit in the communities' social order. The stability of the community is supported by the citizens being conditioned to accept the contentment over the truth. The goal of identity is achieved by genetically engineering the citizens to have be World State clones who conduct their roles without being questioned by anyone. Moreover, the Caste system is aimed to make the citizens have an identity by making them feel that they belong to the community.

Conclusion

The sacrifices that the citizens of World State make are not worth the price since they have been engineered and denied freedom to live freely. The adopted strategy does not control social stability from the base and makes the citizens live a controlled unhappy life. Sending away the disturbers of the stability solves the immediate stability but not the root cause of the stability, thus making the strategy not worth the price. Moreover, creating a disconnection of emotional attachments does not significantly create a positive stability impact. Sending Bernard and John to the island did not mean that Mustapha had gotten rid of trouble makes of the World State Social stability is enhanced by how the leaders and community systems mitigate tensions and conflicts from the root cause. John's idea of valuing the truth, love, and affection rather than happiness has an impact of improving the community togetherness through his strategy does not align with the World State Motto. The adopted strategy is weak and ought to be replaced by stability mitigation such as stronger enforcement of the law and order systems and the supporting the togetherness and unity of the community through creating social integrated activities and events. If the World State leaders had chosen sacrificial strategies like scarfing their emotional for truth, the community would have been lesser civilized. Chasing the community wrongdoers away and genetically engineering the citizens is not an effective strategy and is not worth the sacrifices of society.

Work Cited

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. New York: Harper Brothers, 1932.