Coal-Fired Power Took a Beating During the Pandemic Article Analysis

Summary of the article

This article discusses the impact of coal power on greenhouse emissions. A shift to renewable energy will also be discussed as a result of the current coronavirus pandemic. The primary use of coal is to fuel power plants in the United States that produce electricity. Despite concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, this nonrenewable resource continues to be widely used. Researchers noticed a decrease in demand for coal-generated electricity as compared to other sources of power at the end 2019 COVID-19. This trend could encourage people to switch to renewable energy as soon as possible.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Researchers discovered that there is less demand for coal power at the plants that emit the most greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide, one of the most potent greenhouse gases, has been shown to accelerate global warming and increase the greenhouse effect. It is therefore essential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and move away from coal power in order to achieve a more sustainable future.

The Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (Germany) published a report that analyzed electricity demand and emission in three regions: the US and Europe. A 20% decrease in power demand from 2019 was associated with a 50% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions in certain regions. The most notable changes were in Germany, Spain, Great Britain. Natural gas was traditionally the most expensive power source, with gas-fired plants being the first to cease operations if there was a decrease in power demand. The study results showed that coal power had a higher operating expense than gas power during the pandemic. Researchers believe that the trend to move away from coal-powered plants may continue after the pandemic. Although factories that are powered by renewable energy such as solar and wind require high costs to build, they don't need fuel to run.

It is important to study the coal issue in light of climate change impacts. The amount of carbon dioxide that coal emits is greater than the amount emitted from any other form of power generation. Even a slight decrease in coal-powered plants can result in significant reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. This connection shows that people need to find alternative sources of power in order to prevent climate change. The burning of coal also releases toxic chemicals and pollutes air, which can lead to increased risks of developing heart and lung problems, and neurological disorders.

It is important to discuss alternatives that can be used in order to reduce the negative effects of coal-fired electricity. Ember Climate, a London-based energy research organisation, found that global wind and solar power capacities increased despite the pandemic coronavirus. Renewable power has a lower operational cost than coal, which is a benefit. Renewable or low-emissions energy resources will likely generate a lot of power once there is a rise in the demand for electricity.

The Potsdam report's writers believe that plans for coal power expansion are still possible, particularly in Southeast Asia. This region continues to see a rapid increase in energy demand. High interest rates mean that renewable energy projects will require high costs. The bottom line is that people won't abandon coal power anytime soon, but current circumstances can be used to transition to renewable energy and address climate and health-related concerns. The progress can be slowed down by financial issues and the tendencies in Southeast Asia. According to the article, although climate change may seem unrealistic to many, many people will choose to continue to live in the past rather than make a difference.

What made you choose this news item? What made you find it interesting?

This news item is important because it covers two important topics: climate change and the effects of the pandemic on coal-fired power. The author's study results are crucial for people to become more aware of the dangers associated with coal-powered plants as well as the importance of using renewable energy. The article was interesting because it explained the harmful effects of coal-burning and the toxins that result. It also shows how the current pandemic could be used to switch to solar or wind energy.

What biases or agendas might your news source have?

The public regards the New York Times as an authoritative source of accurate news and information. According to the newspaper's website, its employees strive to find truth and provide objective and impartial opinions. The New York Times is not considered a reliable source of information, but it has an international reputation for being trustworthy.