Big 5 Personality Traits: A Model for Understanding Human Behaviors

Psychological scientists frequently practice a five-factor ideal to gauge what are understood to be five essential traits, or personas, of a person's personality. Usually known as the "Big 5," these behaviors or habits include openness to experience, Conscientiousness, extraversion-introversion agreeableness, and neuroticism.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This five-factor model is mainly used in helping recognize and also forecast the connection between personality behaviors and achievement in social, theoretical, and qualified circumstances. For example, as an administrator at physician practice and get complaints from the physicians that their concern is that the staff continues to isolate the patients and after your observations you conclude that majority of the workers are not people persons but on the other hand do love working correctly with computers when they post charges and payments and make appointments.

According to the big five personality theory, these people will be classified to as Conscientiousness. Conscientiousness may refer to desire to do a chore well and to take responsibilities to others earnestly. Conscientious individuals are mostly hardworking and dependable. They also are expected to be conformists. When occupied to an extreme, they might too be "overachievers," obsessives, and neurotic in their conduct (Watts, 2016). Besides, highly conscientious people have a habit of being organized and attentive to facts. They plan forward, reflect on how their performance disturbs others, and are watchful of deadlines. They highly spend time preparing and also pay their attention to the details.

The changes in the gave case would just be looked at by mostly trying to first check or double-check at every person's trait before employing them. The above will help oneself to identify various and every person's characteristics and will make the new administrator classify each person as per his or her comfort which on the other hand will make the patients get excellent services from the staff. The reason behind this is that since every person will be classified as according to his or her trait, the results will be marvelous since you as an employee will be working at the position in which you are comfortable at (Boling et al . 2016). Secondly, you can also call your workers and try to explain to then on how to change from their traits since it is possible to change from one particular quality to another since they are never fixed. However, the maximum of the characteristics are stable over a certain period, but with age, you realize that the neuroticism trait will decrease while Conscientiousness, on the other hand, increases. When you know that your workers have changed, and then you will be required to divide them as according to their best place of work according to what they will be good at so that they may continue to offer a quality job to the patients.

Lastly, it would be good to avoid such a thing in the future. Therefore this can be done by different means or ways (Young, 2016). Some of these ways may include that of first trying to study every person personality traits, and after identifying them, you can employ them to your firm. In this way, you realize that by doing so you will engage most of the people with different personality traits and as I earlier indicated they are going to offer a quality service to the clients or the patients. Last but not the least, it can be useful to try allowing people in your firm to do what they love most since at times this is what they can do to their best and also please the clients for a quality service.

References

Boling, W. H., Johnson, S. R., Maizel, S. R., & Wiliams, J. F. (2016). Towers To Trenches: Full of Patients But Low on Cash: Managing Conflicts Between Health-Care Needs and Budget Woes.

Watts, J. (2016). Brazil's health system woes worsen in economic crisis. The Lancet, 387(10028), 1603-1604.

Young, Q. D. (2016). Health care reform: A new public health movement. American Journal of Public Health, 106(6), 1023.