Argumentative Essay Sample on Climate Change

Introduction

Scientists give evidence that climate change is the greatest threat on the planet. They also claim that the earth is fast warming, but the causes of warming or human attributions are not understood. The concept of climate change is often misinformed and many arguments have risen on the same matter. Many deniers of climate change believe that factors pointing to climate change are just assumptions and that the climate change scientists overlook the positive and concentrate on the negatives. However, some of the perceptions of climate change may be true but have no exact facts to support them (Egan, Patrick & Mullin ,2). Some of the deniers of adverse effects of climate change use the variation in temperatures from cold to hot as a convincing factor that global warming is after all good to them. Apart from the accusation of Scientists being so concerned with the adverse effects, deniers also doubt the reliability of the models that provide climate change results. Some people believe that climate change took place once while others disagree with this statement basing evidence from the definition of climate. This is an argumentative paper that explores different views about the effects of climate change on the ecosystem.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Climate change is perhaps one of the most pressing issues that have given rise to several arguments. The concept of climate change is viewed by some as amorphous and that it creates room for human denial and intellectual bias. Contentious voices fill the air as more greenhouse gasses are emitted. The debate on climate change sorts through the twist of arguments surrounding this issue to find solutions to unexpected points of agreements. The public perception about the impacts of climate change have much deeper roots than we imagine. This perception of climate change in ancient times has by no means been driven by facts, indications and rational arguments. Addressing this issue of climate change has to root on the connected many problems such as the role and contribution of human beings on the same. The impacts of climate change such as global warming have become so evident, and climate change deniers have been forced to pose more arguments on why we should worry less about global warming (Egan, Patrick & Mullin ,2). The rise in climate change has arguably caused an increase in debates on the impacts that its effects have on the ecosystem.

Climate change has led to an increasing rise in the average temperature on earth also known as global warming. Global warming effects on the planet are felt by a considerable increase in the average temperatures. Scientists present global warming as a severe occurrence that results in the rise in sea levels, droughts, and severe weather events. However, many deniers view these effects as common natural things that can be assumed. It is true that the warm temperatures are so much appreciated in the united states and other states that experience moderate to long seasons of winter. Global warming is seen as not evil but rather a perfect problem. The problem it causes can be turned into a benefit from the perspective that we take when given the same. The United Nations Framework on Climate change report confirms that the effect of global warming is much more felt in the countries within the tropics where the cause is severe drought and rise in sea levels and in the polar reigns where ice is seen to be fast melting (United Nations Framework on Climate change, 34). People who enjoy the increase of temperatures tend to base their arguments only on the comfort they get from the warm weather but forget to mention other much severe effects that climate change causes. Therefore, we are all in agreement that global warming is real. However, there is a dispute on the extent of effect global warming has caused. I agree too when the UNFCC explains that it is not long till the rise in temperatures will continue to be a thing to boast about since the increase is recorded in a much alarming rate (P.14).

There is the question of the reliability of models that measure a rise in temperatures over time. The books that have been written on climate change have since dwelled on the subgenre of the of science fiction (Egan, Patrick & Mullin ,2) The main themes of these written books and the records of temperatures have revolved around themes such as examining the impacts of pollution, global warming effects on human civilization and the rise in sea levels. The results have been made to convince people of how bad the situation is when in the real sense there is no evidence if the models used to find the results are there. However, I also disagree with this kind of skeptics since models have successfully since 1900 recorded a rise in temperature on land air and sea. The books written addressing the issue of climate change are not only written with an aim to convince the students of the negativity of climate change but rather to inform of what has been and that that would be expected to take place (Marshall &Kahneman, 76).

Climate change had changed before, and the effects have since been there only that people are now more sensitive to the negatives than the positives (Ullrich, 102). Climate change is defined in its simple concept as the changes in weather conditions over a long period often over thirty years The effects that we are witnessing today are the negatives that were committed by a previous generation. This might be true, but the positive is more pleasant to hear. The fact that the effects are from the past, the results are positive. I disagree that the view should only dwell on the positivity of climate change. I also disagree with the notion that climate change had changed before. Climate change is taking place daily, and anthropogenic activities are the most significant contributors. The continuous contributions of climate change by human are the sum up to the previous contributors to create a pull of effects that are felt by the current and the future generation. I may agree that there are positive effects of climate change such as the presence of high temperatures that favor others but then the negatives also exist, and it will be nice to only dwell on the positive. When we decide to be neutral and weigh on both sides, the adverse effects of climate change overweigh the positive,

Climate change is extremely amorphous as it provides no specific qualities that give a clear definition. Additionally, climate change offers no deadline with, no particular geographical location, no solution, and no apparent foe. Due to the lack of specific qualities and other factors, people then tend to come up with their own ideas about the earth. This is the situation that leaves climate change to biases. Human, therefore, bend the information they have to fit their prejudices and values. This takes me back to the question that does climate change exist in the first place? Evidence of climate change is noticeable everywhere ranging from loss of biodiversity, long seasons of draught, rise in temperatures above average and unpredicted weather conditions among many other things but then why point them all to climate change. I may agree with this fact that this evidence is not necessarily to be led to climate change but then when we define climate as whether changes that take place after a long period then it surely makes sense. Drying of rivers could not possibly occur in a day. It is apparent that climate change which causes rising temperatures each day is responsible for the drying of rivers and the melting of the snow in the polar region (Ullrich, 102). The northern part is an excellent testifier to this because the polar bears have greatly reduced in number due to unfordable environmental conditions that point to climate.

Conclusion

Climate change exists. The evidence that point to climate change exists also. Additionally, human beings are the most significant contributor to climate change. We are not focusing on the negative but rather the rather found out that when the two are weighed, then there are more negatives than positives. Therefore, whether you agree with scientists about the adverse effects of climate change or not then be guided by morals to do what is right to the planet as it is the giver of life. It is important that people adopt the coping mechanisms as the skeptics suggest. They are preparing the future to be better resilient to climate change.

Works Cited

Egan, Patrick, and Megan Mullin. "Global Warming Feels Quite Pleasant." (2016). Marshall, G., and D. Kahneman. "Understand faulty thinking to tackle climate change." New Scientist 18 (2014).

Ullrich, J. K. "Climate Fiction: Can Books Save the Planet?." Atlantic 14 (2015)UNFCC, "Climate Change: Impacts, Vulnerabilities and Adaptation in Developing Countries." (2007).

Egan, Patrick, and Megan Mullin. "Global Warming Feels Quite Pleasant." (2016). Marshall, G., and D. Kahneman. "Understand faulty thinking to tackle climate change." New Scientist 18 (2014).

Ullrich, J. K. "Climate Fiction: Can Books Save the Planet?." Atlantic 14 (2015).UNFCC, "Climate Change: Impacts, Vulnerabilities and Adaptation in Developing Countries." (2007).