Technological Device Influencing Traditional Communication Styles of Men and Women

Representation of men and women in different prepositions in life show distinct differences in their reaction and conduct in every aspect of life. Establishing the communication styles differences between men and women needs careful evaluation to avoid stereotyping or making biased assumptions on the existing scenario. The nature and nurture of individuals possessed communication styles are presumed attributed to their gender orientation. Women are more presumably accustomed to consensus-based communication style while their men counterparts lean more on the hierarchical techniques. The distinction of male and female methods of communication are shown in the difference in thinking, perceiving, processing, and behavior towards specific information making the relay of data from one person to the other variations in how men and women exploit their oriented messaging elegances (Crair, 2015). The advent of technology in essential communication channels has distinctively emphasized the differences in the communication styles of men and women. This paper will discuss the influence of technological devices on the traditional communication styles of men and women in the modern age.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The average differences in men and women's styles of communication in the conventional models of the messaging show that women are more emotionally driven attached to their communication styles while the men are rather formal in their methods of relaying information from one party to the next. Women create and build on the connection between the conversing bodies to mold a rapport as well as developing commonalities relations by sharing ideas, experiences and exploring the situational with personal emotional investments to ensure that they can see perspectives from the communicator's perspective (Skovholt, Gronning, & Kankaanranta, 789). Men, on the other hand, do not invest their emotions in the majority of their communications styles they can make heads on responses without much evaluation on the emotional appeal of the consequences of their role in the communication's situational fiscal.

Technological advancement in modern communication platforms has not made considerable efforts to bridge the gap between men and women's communication styles. Theoretically, women and women are wired differently regarding their communication styles. Utilization of different technological devices to conduct interpersonal communications with distinct characteristics on the gender basis the differences are immense on how various people from both camps use and explore the ease of communication showing the opposites in perception and reactions of men and women in all kinds of situations. The sophistication of the evolving technological communication devices has changed the way people are communicating in contemporary society. The speculation on how digital migration has embraced feminine characteristics favoring women's communication trend that men. For instance, a majority of the integrated technology devices have automated user aid systems that have a female voice as well as the most of the features in the mobile smartphones, iPads, and iPods.

Social and cultural perception of men and women modes of communication does not favor masculine position especially in the use of emoticons and other improved features on technological communication devices. Men and women are currently using electronic screens of different technology devices at very tender ages especially in teenage. Increasing the accessibility of various available technological devices by minors has in modern days warranty concerns on the limit social and cultural should hold. Men and women learn broad concepts due to the access and time spent on technology devices. Extensive passive use of technological devices among men and women limit the learning experience due to the screen time consumed, the value of interaction, and cognitive processing. Social and cultural should play an active role in the supervision of the media accessed through devices to support them in deeper engagement in productive use of media devices. However, active involvement with technological devices does not assumingly entail pressing buttons or swiping on the screen but should engage reflective ability on the content to show the depth of engagement.

Social and cultural need to allow their men and women access information from different platforms intentionally for appropriate knowledge acquisition where not all information is fit for men and women especially at experimental and inquisitive stages because they tend to explore more sources of information, especially on technological devices to negatively impact on their knowledge (Crair, 2015). Therefore social and cultural and caregivers need to be on the forefront to limit the number of time men and women of all ages access to tech devices. Access to sophisticated technological devices exposes young men and women and teenagers to unfit contents like pornographic materials. It's the social and cultural' responsibility to reduce the number of time men and women sit idling face glued to technological devices screens to limit their internet use. Extensive use of specific applications downloaded into handheld devices exposes men and women to non-child-friendly publicity. The mediation styles adopted by different social and cultural to limit or monitor the number of time men and women spend on tech devices depend on the attitude perceived by the parent. They tend to associate the behavioral changes and other traits adopted by men and women to mass media exposure in tech devices.

Young men and women use technology devices like smart mobile devices at very tender ages without necessarily understanding the basic concepts of the apps. They tap on icons randomly entering or exiting apps motivating the amount of time they press on to learn operative skills gradually. Young men and women get addicted to the extensive use of these technology devices causing parental mediation to limit, supervise and interpret media information. The intervention measures need to be positively perceived by the men and women rather than seemingly portraying restriction or denial. The social and cultural need to craft clearly defined media space with their men and women with measures of applying scheduled routines to meditate on time spent by men and women on media space enhance mutual understanding on access limit of technology devices (Jenkins-Guarnieri, Wright, & Johnson 118).

Conclusion

The majority of social and cultural limit their men and women's access to media devices through current restriction on time and content. This restrictive mediation upraises rebellion of the men and women due to the lack of understanding on why their social and cultural limit their access to technology devices. Others explain their restrictive measures to raise critical awareness of their men and women's exposure to media devices. At other instances, social and cultural prefer to co-use technological devices with their men and women to stimulate the educational quality of the access to tech devices. Also, some social and cultural apply the technical restriction on the amount of information accessed by their men and women through parental control provided for by the digitalized technology devices. They can block men and women from inappropriate publicity and regulate the type of content the men and women access from various devices. All these mediation measures differ due to the parenting styles applied by different people but, they are all geared towards one primary objective. However, the amount of time spent on these tech devices should be the main course of alarm for social and cultural communication issues.

Works cited

Crair, Ben. The Internet Talks Like a Woman, The Cut, May 27, 2015. Available at https://www.thecut.com/2015/05/internet-talks-like-a-woman.html

Jenkins-Guarnieri MA, Wright SL, & Johnson B. The Interrelationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook. Psychology of Popular Media & Culture 2013; 2:117-131.

Skovholt, Karianne; Gronning, Anette & Kankaanranta, Anne. The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-) Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (2014) 780-797 2014 International Communication Association.