Working with both juveniles and adults require the client to participate. Appropriate goals should be made to be manageable for the client to complete. When making a goal, the outcome should be to what positive results are expected and should only have one issue. The setting should be based on the needs of the client to better him or herself. Each goal that is set should be able to address the factors that promote and motivate change for clients and show their similarities in a given setting.
Justice in the juvenile comprises a highly varied process that is driven by the local practices and shaped by law. There is always screening and assessment carried out by different organizations on the youths who come into the justice system after the arrest. The teenagers then face charges against them, which are reviewed for sufficiency in terms of legal obligations and the establishment of the criminal act committed through a formalized court process. In a situation whereby the case merits some types of intervention, the appropriate and cost-effective sanction will match the youth. The outcome of the earlier decisions is influenced by the result of the previous choices. The goal of this process aims at holding the teens accountable for their actions and to enhance the prevention of the crime. The provision of the rehabilitation measures in cases that are risky in nature and reducing the intervention cost too. In this setting, the participants share commitments that are general to the goals which have been declared. The youths also rely on their perspectives of the professionalism and values in decision making. The young offenders are identified, and the appropriate sanction of the child is undertaken for the offense (Altschuler,1994).
In adult correctional institutions, the cases are analyzed based on the psychological tendencies with regards to past behaviors or offense through interactions with inmates. The inmate plan is developed on the treatment of an individual to make a difference in their program in the future. Counseling suggestions are offered to help in emphasizing the deal which has been convicted from the result of the violent action. The correctional manager must be well oriented in a detailed process to be undertaken (Prendergast, Welsh, Lehman & Melnick, 2017). The manager begins by assessing whether the offender is free from the crime or not and identifying the needs of the offender. Keeping with the criminal justice personnel and monitoring the reports from the probation officers. The next stage involves the establishment of goals and actions which are necessary for achieving the needs of the clients. The implementation of the specific activities then follows for the recovery of the offender. Lastly, the evaluation phase is carried out, focusing on the measurement of the issues which have been undertaken the entire process.
The difference in the processes
In juvenile detention, the transition and treatment of the need of the offenders depend on the age of the offenders and the responsibilities of the justice system of the juvenile, which acts in a unique way to and in parental capacity. Furthermore, juvenile offenders are legally limited to some behavior like escaping because they are juveniles. On the other hand, the treatment program allows the community to participate in the transition program during the progress. The institutions can be community-friendly, and the social agencies can be invited to work directly with the offenders as they are being prepared for the release.
The goal of the correctional institution is to ascertain better use of the treatment activities to make good use of the institutional treatment to help offenders in becoming self-sufficient and to show productivity to society (Warda & Dall 2017). The intention is to assist the offenders in moving from the institutional programs to community-based projects with minimal disruption in services. The goal of the adult system of justice is to punish and rehabilitate offenders to enhance competency development. Although there is a rise in response to the violence of the youth, the juvenile system doesn't put more emphasis on the punishment of the offenders but to correct and divert the behaviors of the child. Therefore the rehabilitation efforts in the juvenile system of justice are pervasive. For the youths whose assessments results in substance disorder, mandated participation and legal sanctions may be undertaken
Factors Promoting Change for Clients
The primary factors which are associated with effective interventions for juvenile offenders include; intervention philosophical therapy, serving high-risk offenders, and implementation quality. These findings are consistent with factors posited as correlating with good outcome in residential centers for troubled adolescents and juvenile offenders: good staff-adolescent relations, perception of staff as pro-social role models, positive peer pressure, an individualized therapeutic program approach, developmentally appropriate programs, and activities, clear expectations and boundaries, and placement locations which allow for continued family contact
Recommendations for services and support
The programs like 'Scared Straight' expose the juveniles who are beginning to commit immense offenses to be taken to the prisons of high security. The approach has got a high risk of recidivism, which aids in increased exposure.
Furthermore, there has been observed on the poor outcomes whereby discipline is regarded as a therapeutic benefit, and the hearing of the juvenile has proven to be ineffective in reducing recidivism. The exposure to the juvenile court has got the offending effect on the youth, which are associated with stigma and negativity of the self-mage based on the conviction of the criminal. The act of incarceration leads to numerous implications for the offender, including the harm to social relationships and psychological disturbance and violence exposure.
Conclusion
Arguably, arriving in a sympathetic justice system for the juvenile still requires a long way to achieve. Their variability and the inadequacy of the legal framework, which is not appropriate for the youths to continue to exist in the system of justice. The poor establishments and lack of specialists of the justice institutions lead to ineffective training and rehabilitation activities. Therefore the ethical challenges should be considered and be made relevant with considerations to achieving goals on welfare contribution and interventions.
Reference
Altschuler, D. M. (1994). Intensive aftercare for high-risk juveniles: Policies and procedures: Program summary. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice, and Delinquency Prevention.
Prendergast, M., Welsh, W. N., Stein, L., Lehman, W, Melnick, G., Warda, U & Dall, J. (2017). Influence of organizational characteristics on success in implementing process improvement goals in correctional treatment settings. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 44(4), 625-646. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11414-016-9531-x
Cite this page
Setting Goals for Client Change: Juveniles and Adults. (2023, Mar 29). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/setting-goals-for-client-change-juveniles-and-adults
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Gender Bias for Women in Prison - Research Paper
- Essay Example on Torture in Indonesian Justice System: Stoning to Death & Human Rights
- Essay Example on Tourism: Exploring Beyond the Usual Places
- Essay Example on US: A Superpower Promoting Global Democracy
- Essay on Nutrition: Knowing Macronutrients Is Key for Achieving Fitness Goals
- Essay Example on Unlock Your Potential: How Governments Encourage Entrepreneurship
- Paper Sample on Marginalized Populations: Mental Health, Drug Addiction, and LGBT Youth