River Restoration: Habitat Heterogeneity & Biodiversity - Essay Sample

Introduction

In ecological restoration, a dominant paradigm is that promoting habitat heterogeneity (HH) enhances biodiversity restoration. Researchers imply that this specific paradigm is reflected in water restoration practices through the practice of re-configuring channels to include physical features like riffles and boulders, which enhance structural heterogeneity to restore biodiversity. In the article, "River restoration, habitat heterogeneity, and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?" Palmer et al. (2010) evaluated the validity of the paradigm. Palmer et al. (2010) quantitatively examined the response of invertebrates' richness to the restoration course of action that boosts increased habitat heterogeneity. Also, the article testes the interaction between invertebrate diversity and physical heterogeneity in rivers that did not require restoration.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Palmer et al. (2010) conducted a review of the literature, including publications between 1975-2008, along with the use of the ISI Web of Science to search for theoretical information on the restoration of rivers. By scanning the relevance, validity, and originality of the found 113 articles. Although numerous articles were eliminated from the study,>30 relevant sources were utilized and information on how, why, and when water restoration was done, HH assessment, the number of independent restoration practices, and the result of the project in consideration to the invertebrate species richness. Palmer et al. (2010) found that macroinvertebrate and habitat information for 78 independent projects defined by 18 different researchers. The projects were successful in the promotion of physical HH.

The researchers investigate a critical study in understanding practices surrounding water restoration. The use of prior studies could be useful in identifying barriers in literature and would allow the researchers to identify the specific events behind water restoration. However, Palmer et al. (2010) did not deliver sufficient studies on the particular study design they used in their research. Despite most projects being a success in developing physical HH, only two depicted statistically significant boosts in biodiversity. In the results of the study, significant results were noted with the involvement of literature reviews However, there are limitations to the different findings by Palmer et al. (2010). For example, the research manipulating structural complexity in healthy rivers was small in scale; only a few of them indicated a positive correlation with the diversity of invertebrates. Also, only one-third of the literature signified a relationship of biodiversity to present levels in river heterogeneity found a positive interaction. While there was no evidence implying that HH was a principal element controlling river invertebrate diversity, in the river restoration across the evaluated studies, there were various findings. For example, the results indicated that physical heterogeneity ought not to the driving feature in the decision to select river restoration approaches. From the article, evidence implies that more actions should be taken to restore rivers affected by numerous stressors than re-configuring of waterways and to promote structural complexity with boulders, meanders, and other physical structures as well.

Palmer et al. (2010) study delivered vital information on the restoration of rivers through physical practices and highlighted some of the critical elements that should be considered. The implication of the study is based on all the activities that occur on land and rivers such as agriculture, deforestation, urbanization, and other human activities. Such stressors make river restoration difficult. Hence, Palmer et al. (2010) suggest that the best actions would be diagnosing the stressors influencing ecology to reduce the need for restoration. With the limitations in the study, such as the use of literature review and studies with no statistical evidence, future research is essential to investigate the different ways that restoration can be avoided or enhanced in cases where it is inevitable.

Reference

Palmer, M. A., Menninger, H. L., & Bernhardt, E. (2010). River restoration, habitat heterogeneity, and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology, 55, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x