Research Paper on Fine Tuning Design

Introduction

In the Fine-Tuning Design Argument, Robin brings up the concept that the formation of the earth and the existence of life basically were triggered by a "fine tuning". Holistically every concept in the earth has set limits of physics and fundamental laws that if violated, life would be impossible. He bases his argument on two hypotheses. One; single is the single universe hypothesis and the many-universe hypothesis. Some of the facts raised are:

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

1. The fine-tuning design acts in way that all factors of, like density, altitude, mass, electromagnetic force, gravity force were finely tuned or set to the accurate measurements and setting to ensure life is possible.

2. The Single universe hypothesis states that there is no other universe apart from this one and the concept of fine tuning is irrelevant.

3. The many-universe hypothesis claims that there are various universes but only one has been finely tuned to hold life and ensure survival.

4. Single hypothesis acts on the possibilities chances and factual findings of initials conditions that existed long before.

5. Prime principle of confirmation entails the aspect of different scientific findings that are applicable. (4)

6. The fine-tuning design is challenged by some facts like the existence of other fundamental laws that explain why the setting of physics` parameters, existence of life in other forms and the existence of God.

7.The Atheist would contend with the findings outlined by the many-universe hypothesis. (3)

8. Big bang theory and the vacuum fluctuation are some the theories that are used to explain the existence of many universes. (3)

9.The many-universe hypothesis is opposed by other facets that explain the natural studies that explain a different principle.

10. The laws that can be followed to explain the existence of other universes would somehow differ with physical laws.

11. There is no factor in the many-universe hypothesis that can explain the relationship between matter and the standard balance that can be used to justify the fine-tuning design in every universe.

12. The fine-tuning model is at per with what theism dictates. The universe was created by a being that made sure it would be survivable.

Robin explains and also justifies the model of fine-tuning basic his facts from physics, theism, and anti-theism. He explains rather why each factor either agrees to or rejects the model. I think that the fine model falls in line with the fact that the universe was created by a supreme being and that is God. Otherwise what facts can be used to explain how one universe holds life but others do not. Unless someone had to consider what measures to consider to ensure survival, other systems cannot explain the same fact.

Conclusion

I think fine tuning system was a clear indicator that things did not fall just in to place but rather they were taken care of by one who was in charge. I also think that physics explains and gives findings that already existed from a time before. Density, mass, and force of gravity were concepts that existed and physicians only discovered them. Therefore, I would judge that the same facets cannot be used to explain the fine-tuning model. As Robin tries to argue (9) is a factual concept which I agree with. I mean what findings can one table to explain the setting of the level of parameters. Robin (4) makes a clear claim that should explain why the fine-tuning system should be questioned. However, I think that the model should be reconsidered before it is justified to be correct.

References

Collins, R. (2014). The fine-tuning design argument: A scientific argument for the existence of God.