Research Paper on Cognitive Dissonance: Unequal Rewards Lead to Hard-to-Deal-With Phenomena

Introduction

Cognitive dissonance refers to any situation which involves behaviors, attitudes, or beliefs where unbalance and tensions inconsistently occur in the thoughts of a person. The feeling occurs when new information which is given to people causes them to become more defensive and get agitated to restore the balance (Zentall, 2016). Insufficient rewards bring forth particular results that can account for several phenomena which are hard to deal with, primarily if average conceptualizations are used in the role of compensation. The paper compares two studies the Milgram experiment and Poland and the Stanford prison Experiment. Stanford Prison Experiment reiterates the nature of social power in investigating its psychological perception in the life of the prisoners and prison officers. The Milgram experiment primarily tests the people obedience in Poland. The research used shocks and to present the participant with a certain level of pressure in order to get the best results possible. Although ethical concerns were center part of the study, the researchers created a set up that used lower levels of shocks to test the level of obedience of the participants. This paper focuses on examining the relationship between cognitive dissonance and insufficient rewards in comparison with the Stanford Prison Experiment.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Hypothesis

Stanford Prison Experiment

The concept of insufficient reward is usually discussed in the dissonance theory, which shows that every individual has an inner drive which holds his or her beliefs in harmony to avoid any disharmony (Chapanis & Chapanis, 2017). However, if the behavior, belief or attitude is not in balance yet consistent thought might be, the evidence is a person?

Conducting the Milgram Experiment in Poland

The level of compliance and obedience in people primarily affects their interactions on behavior. Moreover, the study was born to test the limits of people obedience and respect udder the conditions if authority and cognitive dissonance. The study sought to understand how people would react or obey orders under a particular authority figure and in circumstances that contradicted their beliefs.

Research Question

Stanford Prison Experiment

What main behaviors, attitudes or beliefs that inconsistently cause tensions or unbalance in the thoughts of a person, and what are the specific results produced by insufficient rewards which accounts for several processes that are difficult to handle if they are used for active participation in the reward itself as well as the psychological collection in the Stanford Prison Experiment?

Conducting the Milgram Experiment in Poland

The study was aimed at determining how high level of obedience is evident in people of Poland. It is evident that people have a different level of compliance and this is what the researchers were trying to look at when they initiated the study. Primarily, the level of shocks in the study was much lower than in other studies that had been conducted previously. This was to comply with the ethical concerns that had been raised after previous studies. What were the behavior of the Mailgram study participant when the low shocks were initiated and how this affected their level of obedience and where there any side effects form the study?

Literature Review

The Cognitive Dissonance Theory and the Stanford Prison Experiment

Various points of a person's life in most cases are determined by things which the individual does which are in contrary to their beliefs and the association with the prison life (Zimbardo, 2016). In workplaces or learning institutions, supervisors or professors usually ask their employees and students respectively to undertake specific tasks and activities which are against their private opinions (Zentall, 2016). During such incidences, a person is obliged to doing the tasks regardless of his or her attitudes and opinions. Previous research shows that under these conditions, the prisoner will change his or her position to make his or her attitude correspond to the available opinions. According to Garaus, Furtmuller and Guttel (2016), the experience which involves engaging in behaviors which are contrary to one's private attitudes refers to dissonance (Garaus, Furtmuller & Guttel, 2016). Other studies also show that people usually strive towards consistency on certain duties within themselves as well as their lives to get rewarded (Chapanis & Chapanis, 2017). As a result, several research studies conclude that the inclination of engaging in certain behavior after removal of extrinsic rewards is not the intended functions of the past rewards.Research Methodology

Sampling Method

The Cognitive Dissonance Theory and the Stanford Prison Experiment

Thirty undergraduate students, both male, and female ate ending the local college were sampled to participate in the research study. The sampled students were third and fourth-year students from Wario College and prisoners (Zimbardo, 2016). The students were between age's twenty-two and twenty-four years old, respectively; fifteen male and five females (Harmon-Jones & Harmon-Jones, 2018). Different names were given to the participants before they are subjected to a series of questionnaires to determine the actual reason behind the perceived attitude or beliefs in behavior.

Results

The outcome from the responses which were given by the student's shows that dissonance reduction method can cause significant insufficient reward among employees or students (Zimbardo, 2016). Cognitive dissonance theory explicitly explains the relationship, behavior and social recognition. It provides a significant relationship between employees and their employers for a meaningful reward.

Conclusion

The cognitive dissonance theory asserts that if a person is held between different ideas or beliefs, his or participation is jeopardized. However, Stanford Prison Experiment maintains that the investigation of the psychological effects on the perceived power between the prison officers and the prisoners can only be made by adding new elements or changing the cognition. Overall, the insufficient reward is built from perceptions which most participants are subjected to in their daily activities.

References

Chapanis, A., & Chapanis, N. P., (2017). Cognitive dissonance: Five years later. In Attitude Change (pp. 116-153). Routledge.

Garaus, C., Furtmuller, G., & Guttel, W. H. (2016). The hidden power of small rewards: The effects of insufficient external rewards on autonomous motivation to learn. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1), 45-59.

Harmon-Jones, C., & Harmon-Jones, E., (2018). Toward an Increased Understanding of Dissonance Processes: A Response to the Target Article by Kruglanski et al. Psychological Inquiry, 29(2), 74-81.

Zentall, T. R. (2016). Cognitive dissonance or contrast?. Animal Sentience: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Animal Feeling, 1(12), 1.

Zimbardo, P. (2016). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: A lesson in the power of situation. Perspectives on Contemporary Issues, 309-317.