Racism: Prejudice, Restrictions & Denial of Rights - Essay Sample

Introduction

Racism is any belief or act that assumes someone is menial because of their skin color or race. it is directly or indirectly restricts people from accessing services or denying them the right to join specific learning intuitions or even receiving medical services. Many times, a person is treated lesser than the others because of factors such as color, nationality, immigration status, race, descent, and ethnic origin. Sometimes the prejudice comes from a rule and policy that everyone is to follow, but it excludes some people. Racism child protection means protecting children from being discriminated against due to their different original races. Many, at times, children are discriminated against due to the lack of knowledge of their rights. In this paper, I'm going to discuss racism in child protection.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

According to the journal Black Lives Matter ( Roberts & Songoi, 2018), a single black mothers experiences racial disparity because of admitting to using marijuana from time to time and ends up being separated from her two sons. It visibly shows the way the child welfare system discriminates the black families. In the USA, a lot of black families separated from their families, and it causes emotional damage to those children separated from their families because many of the times, they move from one foster home to another. The judges and officials involved in these cases judge black parents based on factors such as poverty, like a situation where siblings are sharing a single room. Meanwhile, wealthier families are allowed access to their kids even when found violating the terms.

Additionally, Parents of black children are exposed to discontinuation of their rights as parents at greater height than parents of white kids. Survey arrays that these racial gaps emerging in the overrepresentation of black youngsters in courts in foster care are not due to injustice incidences or indifference in black families compared to white ones (Galante, 2019). A survey in the New England Journal of Medicine came to a conclusion that even though there is a kin consumption of drug abuse either on black or white expectant women, black women are most probably going to be presented to the jurisdiction. This journal stands for the voices of the black society as they seek changes to be made by the acting foster organization and oust it with extreme different ways centered on the decency, demands, and same compassion on families. However, the civil rights organization managed in adding Black people's entry to general aid and approach towards welfare deviated.

Notably, the child welfare system stream-lined these advancements, with affluence accessible for guardianship and adoption adding while the assets are accessible for in-home services like child care reduced. The government also set up funds to support orphanages and acquisition of their kids. This thought became a principle in the enactment of the 1997 Adoption and Safe Families Act. Previous research has discovered that the decision to withdraw maltreated children from their homes is impacted by a variety of elements, including the kind of abuse and race of child victims. The few children and families are receivingdifferent services in the child protective system. This survey showed limited support for the aversive racism thesis and no support for the modern apartheid perspective. Overall, the data shows how race matters in the child welfare system decision-making.

Moreover, It is essential to reduce racial prejudice to avoid the phenomenon of racism from reaching its goal. Racism is illegal in many cases; therefore, if not diminished, it could lead to more prejudice. Consequently, it should be worked on because everyone has his or her figuring out towards the world. In our communities, we can do several things to reduce that: document activities that reflect racism identify and understand the kind of policies that need to be challenged and also determine the goals of your strategies, among other things. While at our workplaces, we can employ staff that is not racists, recruit diverse board members, executives, and managers and also ask for opinions from people of color on the barriers they encounter at work.

Never the less, schools should organize field trips to historical places that show struggles against racism or places that exhibit the values and beliefs of another group of people. Including anti-racism education in your school's program and form a plan to change racist laws in your school. You can also use the media to plan presentations to educate people about the values and beliefs of diverse groups and help them understand the adverse effects of their coverage related to race and nationality.

While anti-oppression views in social work are more and more being promoted like a continuous and free social justice reaction, we contend that they are restricted in their capability to talk about racism in the child welfare system (Pryce, 2019). As an alternative, we assert that critical race for the women's movement and antagonisms are more dangerous and metamorphic moves to social work in contrast to anti-oppression. As anti-oppression knowledge becomes more streamed (McLaughlin, 2005), its supporters rarely discuss hard topics such as anti-Black, anti-Native racism and white supremacy especially concerning child welfare. Contrary, critical race feminism intellectuals such as Sunera Thobani (2007) contend that the overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Black children in the care of the Canadian child protection system is inseparable from the chronicles of white supremacy in Canada. Thinking about this philosophy of forgetting is that in spite of the noticeable racial challenge, very small information is stated in the child welfare writing about anti-Black racism and white supremacy.

Nevertheless, these ideas give a potent way to comprehend this occurrence of racial discrimination in the Canadian child welfare system. This concept of anti-Black racism draws attention to the specific racism experienced by Blacks in Canada, from the chronicles of slavery and the crude era. Anti-Black racism draws attentiveness to the rules and exercises that made education isolated, employment, and housing encountered by people of colour in Canada (James et al., 2010). It concerns the distinct ways of colonialism and racism encountered by Native people in Canada. White chauvinism refers to the belief that white people are more superior than other races. As we have seen, the notion of white supremacy is from the history of modernity and European colonialism.

African American Discrepancy board of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, with assistance from the University of Minnesota, did an anamnesis that involved checking out cases of negligence. This anamnesis was done in order to make better the methods used to investigate potential ethnic biasness in the child welfare system. Applying qualitative and quantitative studies is to be ruled by following these research questions that were solicited: considerations involved with the choosing and the shipment of the child welfare services to families. Secondly, do the services differ by race when deciding on other factors that impact service placement resolution and thirdly the aspects, including a race that influence in deciding the placing of a child in out-of-home care. The aim of the qualitative study was to discover and determine the effects of racism. In the qualitative analysis, information from the same 162 instances used in the quantitative analysis was used.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it can be denoted that antagonism and critical race feminism are the best methods for understanding the present-day racial imbalance in child welfare. The two ways, which values sharing power, represent alternatives to anti-oppression discourses in that anti-colonialism and critical race feminism promise more competent and critical feedback to racism and colonialism And we see how times have changed in the government where there are elected leaders from the bias groups, therefore, making sure that there is child protection against racism even in the rules they set up.

Work Cited

Castrianno Galante, Lynn Marie. "Subtle racism in child welfare decision-making." (1999).

Pryce, Jessica, et al. "A case study in public child welfare: county-level practices that address racial disparity in foster care placement." Journal of Public Child Welfare 13.1 (2019): 35-59.

Roberts, Dorothy, and L. K. Sangoi. "Black families matter: How the child welfare system punishes poor families of color." The Appeal (2018).

Wells, Susan J., and Angela Neal. "The impact of child welfare services on racial disparities in outcomes: Child welfare services for African American and Caucasian children in four Minnesota Counties." Title IV-E Curriculum Module, Subject Summary, (2009).