Paper Example on Multicultural Psychology

Introduction

The relative perspective on psychopathy is a scenario of psychology being reflected. Concepts are developed by people who aid in the development of norms of behaviors which facilitates the learning of emotions reactions as per the prescription of the culture in place. Every person within the distinct cultural should be familiar to the different psychological unconformities. The relative perspective of psychopathology is not identical for different in every culture. This translates that every religion is specific to its tradition and can only be well understood by the people in the culture. This may be for instance the political, social and political cultural practices, norms and ties. Such standards practiced are generally different from country to country as a result of the people in the states. My perspective on psychopathy is that which does not have a negative emotional response to selfish behaviors hence tend to act in a way that they ensure benefit without external influences including useful emotional results.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Self-serving bias is the tendency of a society to show positive events to their character even though attributes the adverse circumstances to pressuring influences. In the context of social psychology, the self-serving bias is commonly understood. For instance, a positive development could include that which a student passes his examinations with a distinction, and they attribute the success to their abilities. On the other hand, an adverse event could include that which a student fails at a particular subject, and they attribute the failure to their instructors for not having taught to a level at which they could have understood the subject better.

A group-serving bias is similar to the self-serving bias except that it usually takes place between a group of people rather than individual people. In the group-serving bias, group members the can make dispositional attributions for the success of the group and situational attributions on the condition that the group fails. For example, in families and ethnic groups, the success of the groups can be attributed to their internal strengths whereas their weaknesses can be attributed to their external threats. The group-serving bias blames the outside world for most failures.

The unassuming bias is the tendency to explain personal success as could have resulted from external influences including luck or help. On the other hand, individual failure can be attributed to own mistakes and weaknesses instead of external threats. For instance, as people migrate to Canada, the success and the shortcomings of the people can be attributed to internal factors including personal assistance.

Conclusion

In human development, conformity can be considered as one of the significant influences. It is thorough conformity that a culture's homogeneity is stabilized within groups. The resultant effects of the cultural identity as displayed in the human development context is dependent on the way that people are influenced by how many witnessing is made. For instance, tourists who visit animal orphanages can be asked to give answers to written questions and get a small prize as a result. When they are asked to either draw or write and the results evaluated, an effect of the proportion of writings displayed on the balance of writings of answers can be perceived. This shows the possibility of a conformist impact that is linear with some traces of a non-linear component. Secondly, a woman can be asked to read a book for a particular meeting and ends up enjoying the read before she meets up with peers. As soon as she attends the meeting, other people dislike the book. However, she then agrees with the multitude that the book is not as impressive as she thought it could have been instead of going against the opinion of the majority.