Overall Value of George Orwell's 1984 in the Contemporary World

Date:  2021-12-19 16:06:08
5 pages  (1358 words)
Back to list
logo_disclaimer
This essay has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Orwells nightmarish 1984 is the most famous English language dystopian of the 20th century which paints a bleak picture of the future and the profound trend of contemporary, technologically stylish modernizing countries to cope with reality. It is a worrying trend that sales of the book increased after the inauguration of Donald Trump as the president of the USA. The novel has resurfaced as a text of interest in our current American political reality. With the ascendance of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States, it seems as though the electorate in this country has reached back into history to deal with the problems of the 21st century. Successfully campaigning on racism, misogyny and xenophobia, too many the Trump administration feels more like a regime than the result of the democratic process. This being the case, it is no major surprise that people are returning to the classic novel that was a denunciation of 20th-century totalitarianism. This paper illustrates the overall value that Orwell 1984 has in the contemporary world.

If this sample essay on"Overall Value of George Orwell's 1984 in the Contemporary World" doesn’t help,
our writers will!

The western realm apt to see repression in terms that are more communal than political. The multifaceted nature of the innovative administration of current life has driven numerous to gripe that we are getting to be minor quantities of figures under the impassive control of databanks and PCs. Such notices started as ahead of schedule as George Orwell's political novel 1984, composed directly after world war 11. George Orwell's 1984 has portrayed a learned-free universe of the envisioned future. Propelled totalitarian technocracy permits no space for savvy people who are supplanted by mental professionals, intolerant specialists, resolute devotees, functionaries, and masters in indoctrinating. Neither social/open dissidents nor the established sort of researcher endures in the disastrous world. Science fiction had long articulated the fear of technocracy in stories depicting the horrors of life in a perfectly rationalized society (Feenberg, 23). At stake in dystopias like George Orwells 1984 is the destiny of the human spirit in a world based on scientific enlightenment. The issue is not simply the destructive misuse of scientific discoveries but the fate of individuality in a scientific world. The successful integration of modern mass society provokes a nostalgic backward glance toward lost freedoms. The isolated individualistic hero of these tales stands for the human values inevitably ground underfoot by the march of Reason. George Orwell's book frames a contrary perfect world, in which the material and mental existences of all group individuals and the overall population are controlled, discrediting their identities and human-like presences. This fanciful or prophetic Orwellian world can be investigated with the verifiable advancement of the world in light of the market -the universe of the contemporary material monoculture, set up on the philosophy of "might-makes-right" or the rationale of the solid (Donskis, 167). The last world, streamlined as the universe of Big Market, fanatically affirms the tricky trinity of free rivalry, free market and organized commerce, by forcing on all people a specific and disproportionate value framework that might be characteristically outsider to all social orders. It likewise powers all people into a heightening unending competition a royal battle that outcomes just in the vulnerability, precariousness and frailty of human life and living. With the exception of the little minority of the wealthy, and in addition the politically influential nation structure of present day capitalism - Big Market.

In the midst of the various subjects of George Orwell's novel 1984 is the method in which very controlled society can dispose of history. This book does not contend that the general public in which we live has intentionally endeavored to oust our history and our aggregate memory of the past. We are informed that we live in another hazard society and that individuals and their associations with each other and themselves are fundamentally unique. This book accepts that society exists. The British Prime Minister Mrs. Thatcher broadly expressed that society does not exist, and different sociologists have created parts of this thought, contending that in a worldwide world we never again live in dissimilar social orders however in one universe. The interest of this thought is significant.

The Red Fascism's American image encompassed emotion and simplism, and the convincing fictional manifestations and against an ideal world of essayists, for example, George Orwell helped encourage the unrefined apprehensions of totalitarianism and had turned out to be fanatical, did much to shape American idea and sentiment. For researchers who are serious as well as casual readers alike, the picture of totalitarianism introduced in 1984 has been a model, as stunning and most likely as huge as that was created by American pioneers and the broad communications from the war's conclusion to the book's distribution in American in 1949.

Orwell was not prosecuting any one society rather he was cautioning humankind that in each contemporary society no matter what there were inclinations which, permitted to create unchecked, (Breckman, 30) may bring us inside an age into a world where every one of the estimations of truth and equity, leniency and opportunity, tolerability and fairness would be yielded to clear a path for another world in which Utopia would rise in its own gross.

Orwell's information of Marxist principle was not as much as comprehensive however, he obviously could awe even customary Marxists with that learning. In spite of the fact that analysts discover little confirmation in Orwell of a significant learning of Marx's works, he cites a hidden implication to the Communist Manifesto and calls attention to that Orwell has a canine named Marx. Then again, Orwell knew an awesome strategy about Marxism and he viewed Marx's hypothesis as a helpful instrument for testing different speculations of thought (Bloom, 147). Orwell, by and large, was not especially great at prediction either. In 'Britain Your England' he predicts that unless Britain loses the war against Germany the declining of threats will wipe out a large portion of the current class privileges. Orwell additionally promptly conceded that he had been off-base to anticipate Churchill's acquiescence after the debacle of the loss of Singapore to the Japanese in 1942 or, so far as that is concerned, the proceeded, long-haul coordinated effort of Germany and the Soviet Union.

There is a certain irony in the fact that Martin Jays Marxism and Totality appeared in 1984, the year when real historical time overtook George Orwells dystopian totalitarian future. For all the fanfare with which the media greeted the arrival of Orwells portentous year, his prophetic vision seemed wide of the mark when measured against the real 1984. Though one would not want to understate the reality of the Soviet bloc's repressive politics at a time when no one yet foresaw communism's imminent collapse, the USSR in the wake of Brezhnev was a far cry from the Stalinist regime that had fuelled Orwell's worse fears the West, contrary to Orwell's expectation, had not devolved into the other half of the Totalitarian world. Nor did Orwell look like an adequate guide to the history of the European intellectual left in the twentieth century (Breckman, 117). That history must distinguish between the totalitarian vision and the philosophically compiling efforts of Western Marxists to develop a critical theory of the social totality in the service of emancipatory goals. In upholding that distinction and taking the richness of the western Marxist concept of totality, Marxism and Totality makes amply clear that, by the early 1980s, the western Marxist tradition had been eclipsed by the rise of French poststructuralist was a style of thought deeply suspicious of the Hegelian underpinnings of western Marxism and that tradition's yearning for expensive totality. Despite Jay's final plea that we not entirely abandon the search to see things whole, the book ends with the distinct sense that western Marxism had reached its terminus.

Works Cited

Bloom, Harold. George Orwell's Animal Farm. New York: Bloom's Literary Criticism, 2009. Internet resource.

Breckman, Warren et al. The Modernist Imagination: Intellectual History And Critical Theory. Berghahn Books, 2013, p. 458.

Donskis, Leonidas. Troubled Identity and the Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. Internet resource.

Feenberg, Andrew. Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. Internet resource.

Perkins, Lori. 1984 in the 21st Century: An Anthology of Essays. , 2017. Internet resource.

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal: