Geopolitics and IR Theories: Exploring Liberalism, Realism & Transnationalism - Essay Sample

Introduction

As an international relations understudy, it not a specific enthusiasm for geopolitics or any hypothesis identifying with it. Regardless of whether old-style or contemporary, geopolitical hypotheses constantly struck me as being mentally ruined, firmly one-sided toward the interests of some gathering, and as being of, best case scenario optional significance. They were, as it could be seen, just the endeavors of specific writers to get well known and to compose sellable books. Therefore, this research paper focuses on answering the interrogative assertion the can affect international relations (IR) theories explain the current geopolitical landscapes through the use of various international models and underpinning indo-pacific illustrations to reinforce the stand taken in the research.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

As quite a while admirer of IR hypothesis, and in the wake of having perused and review the quantity of work related to geopolitics hypothesis, politics, and topography its concluded that it will facilitate the connection between the two areas of study, such as IR and geopolitics. The more information to be read regarding these aspects, the more significant it became for the geopolitics and realists. What's more, the more significant it became for them is that they see its nonappearance in standard international relations. Among the most influential and broadly utilized reading material with respect to the IR hypothesis through its improvement is a book altered by Scott B. and Andrew L. It realized the books were refreshed to enhance their sync and ensure their advancements in the geopolitics and IR field.

In this case, the field of geopolitics, both in conventional and basic detects, was so significant, and its significance with respect to enhancing comparison of past and contemporary aspects of geopolitics and international relations. Furthermore, this is how the research question got extracted from; the research question is: Can Conventional International Relations (IR) Theories Explain, The Contemporary Geopolitical Landscape? Are IR Models Useful Tools For Strategists?

Geopolitics got conceived in the late 19th century but vanished from colleges and universities during the last days of World War II. International Relations, as a different scholastic order, got its establishment mid-war that led to the integration of the enemy countries. Regardless of the way that both geopolitics and international relations manage unvarying matters and offer numerous normal presumptions, the IR hypothesis never straightforwardly makes reference to geopolitics or its unmistakable figures. This was expected from the start to the visionary trait of the US IR during its rise in the mid-war time. After World War II, pragmatists went to the fore. Instead of the optimist perspective, pragmatists saw IR as force legislative issues and rivalry between self-intrigued states with regards to a revolutionary global framework. Ironically the Second World War denoted the triumph of authenticity and simultaneously the loss of geopolitics. Much the same as the term race, geopolitics was deleted from scholarly writing as per its nearby relationship with Nazism.

Geopolitics was established during the last phase of the 19th century and ended up in its deathbed with the cessation of 2rd Word War from the university syllabus due to its polarization implications on various parties. However, its disappearance lead to the birth of an alternative, and an integrative item called the international relations (IR.) The latter social aspect was founded mid-war to advocate for peace and integration among the conflicting nations and their allies. The two items shared a wide range of items in common despite the fact that World War II lead to the fall of one and the rise of the other. Earth's geography has a great influence on the current political landscapes due to the formation of political alliances and the reinforcement of affiliations by various parties within common geographical locations. Despite the difference in geographical occupations of different countries, for instance, the United States of America and China, there are strong political ties that either causes strong affinity or repulsion between the two nations in a situation known as the indo-pacific relationship. This phenomenon occurs due to either similarities or disparities in the pursued interests of each of the nations as described by various international relations (IR) theories.

The current geopolitical landscapes have been identified by acute dynamics and shifts due to the constant change in the political culture of different countries globally. However, there are various determinant factors the shape the directions taken by international politics that results in the formation of various alliances with common agendas. Political strategists employ various international relations models in achieving desirable geopolitical aspects that favor political stance at hand. Some of the main theories that play a critical role in the attainment of such contemporary geopolitical landscapes and affiliations are realism, liberalism, and transnationalism, with the main parties being the United States of America and China (Indo-Pacific relationship).

The Geopolitics Imaginations and Significance of Maps

At a glance, geopolitics and the use of maps in representing the ideological distribution of countries (China and the United States of America) give different perceptions on how people view such maps. However, such maps have important significance and play a critical role in giving the relationship between geopolitics and international relations. Maps are artistic elements that contain silent and well-articulated knowledge and factual information that are partial, selective, and biased in nature. They represent various landscapes on a piece of paper and hence carry large geopolitical contents of different countries shown in a piece of paper. In the article

United States of America Geopolitics

The US geopolitics got the dictation from a well-known Monroe Doctrine up to the start of World War I. This Doctrine was advanced by President James Monroe during the yearly messages he gave to Congress in 1823. Based on the message, he managed to recognize that the ancient society and contemporary society that had various frameworks and must stay unmistakable circles through this Doctrine that announced that the US would never meddle in the wars.

In any case, while the hundreds of years-long force battle were heightening in Europe, the new intensity of the 4th society was creating. The indo-pacific conflicts of the 1890s were the main US abroad battle of victory and subsequently comprised the primary break in the principle. Because of developing need, the US's initial planners and geopolitics scholars began to create speculations by a turn of the century. Through this point of fortifying the intensity of their nation, the specialists set to develop precepts for an indo-pacific maritime matchless quality, and the US naval force had started to dare the thought that Britain regulations the waves.

The main notable specialist/geopolitical scholar of the US was Mahan (1850-1913), a maritime official and student of history who in the 1890s distributed his school addresses in a book entitled "The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1670-1793". In this book, Mahan contended for the significance/matchless quality of ocean control over land-power, and therefore, maritime prevalence got the basic guideline together with the premise of international strategy. Mahan's efforts triumph quick acknowledgment, and it was generally perused in China and other affiliate countries. Despite the fact that Mackinder, through the acclaimed address in 1905, gave little consideration to the 4th society, they took Mahan's conversation ashore controls versus ocean controls truly. Mahan impacted the development of maritime powers in the years preceding the 1st World War, particularly in China. Besides, Mahan's differentiation among land and ocean powers kept on impacting geopolitics masterminds all through the Cold War, as Mahan had likewise upheld a coalition with China to balance sea powers.

Mahan sheltered numerous radical convictions and needed America to turn into a politically influential nation. The manner in which he imagined for the US to accomplish this objective was through the development of its maritime powers. As it was, so as to turn into a force to be reckoned with, the USA originally needed to set up its quality on the high oceans. He likewise affirmed that universal law and methods for law and tact are of auxiliary significance, while power is the reason for international strategy.

The start of World War I authoritatively denoted the culmination of vantage points of the Monroe Doctrine. The US contended that it went into World War I is the consequence of its good global duties. At this progression point, the United States of America turned into a functioning player in world legislative issues. US intercession additionally denoted the start of the visionary endeavor in world legislative issues. During the interwar period, optimism/radicalism, related to the musings of President Woodrow Wilson, prevailed. As per this way of thinking, every country reserved the option to self-assurance. Rather than applying racial encryptions, countries got characterized in social footings, for example, regular history, customs, and linguistic.

Wilson's perspectives stopped the period of realms as in national self-assurance turned into the request for the day. As indicated by this geopolitics and IR vision of the current society groups and countries, geopolitics organizations being their country states. The new system likewise compulsory partnerships so as to forestall the fiasco from happening once more.

Liberalism

The geographer of the realist endeavor was Isaiah B; he played a critical role as a specialist to the legislature, most outstandingly at the Treaty of Versailles. Right away subsequent to joining World War I, President Wilson made an Inquiry Committee, which produced 1,200 maps focusing on the ethnic, political, and historical limits of Europe. Bowman was a key individual from the Committee. Later on, he turned into the executive of the AGS in 1916, where he served there for the resulting 30 years. At a Washington-Beijing Peace talk, Bowman took an interest in the American Delegation as Chief Territorial Specialist and assumed a critical job in the post-war mapping endeavors. During the 1918 Peace Talks, the common pattern was to draw improved bounds for a superior attack of countries so as to set up unitary country states. The US had an underwriter and model for the new framework, which planned for building a fit among...