Essay Sample on Rights of Animals

Introduction

As a way of the humans in the creation of the social order with other animals in the same kingdom, there was the need for the equal humans to come up with the issue of the rights to help bring in some form of sanity into the system. However, it is very discouraging that these rights have very little to do with the other animals who are non-human. Moreover, it is often viewed as if these non-human animals have no legal rights to be catered for in the society. The whole scenario has led to the little or no interest among the humans to lobby for such rights on the other animals (Gupta, Anukriti and Prayas 34). On a level playground, the responsibility of the humans is to let other species live, give them some form of humane treatment as a way of recognizing their rights.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Humans have the responsibility of capturing and caging these animals as a means of domesticating the same animals. However, caution should be taken while dealing with such issues in that the humans must make sure that the health of these animals is considered significant in the process of fulfilling the needs of these animals. Amazingly, it would also be important to note that the welfare of the animals does not necessarily mean taking good care of their rights (Oyarce 11). The act of speciesism is similar to the issues liked to bigotry and sexism and thus cannot be considered right for the treatment of the animals especially in conditions of restrictions. This gesture is based on the fact that these animals are often tortured, and butchered. The problem is even aggravated by the fact that the humans do not experience any form of such acts from the other animals in the kingdom.

Morality and Practicality of Euthanasia

Yes, there is a massive difference between the two issues in this prompt based on both the moral and practical perspectives. For instance, a person can buy for one all the available food listed on the restaurant menu, but it is the obligation and right of the individuals to choose on what to eat and what not to eat. The person is even under within his rights to decide not to eat anything from the restaurant list. Persons in great pain based on a terminal illness do not possess the right to die in whatever circumstance (Smith 165). This idea is on the fact that the life of a human being is precious and should not be for granted as in the case of terminally ill patients. Both the religious and the non-religious groups feel the pain of the death of a loved one, and most inclinations believe that God is the only Supreme Being that can take the life of a person in any circumstance. Therefore, the terminally should be assisted to get back to life until the final step where nature takes its toll.

On the other side, the Physician-Assisted Suicide gives a difference in the degree of the behavior. This activity involves the availing of the lethal means to the patient that can be applied in the mercy killing in case the patient consents to the same. On the contrary, euthanasia entails the physician taking the leading role in delivering the request by the patient (Oyarce 11). In most cases, this method often utilizes the delivery of a lethal substance in an intravenous manner. In whatever way the practices are, they still violate the right of the patient to life and should not be practiced.

Euthanasia should be illegal in that as much as the patient has been under pain; there is no need of taking his life away. People suffer on a daily basis and are often under suffering, and so the idea of pain has no base of ending his life in any context. In the real sense, by taking away the presence of a person, no illness has been stopped, but actual murder has been committed. Physician-assisted suicide is illegal in that it is the responsibility of the doctors to make the patient feel better (Smith 155). The patient may be feeling hurt, but it is the work of the physicians to take away the pain. Taking a different approach to ending their lives do not bring any trust in the medical profession in any way.

Works Cited

Gupta, Kshitiz, Anukriti Sharma, and Prayas Sharma. "The Notion of Morality of Death and Human Behaviour."

Oyarce, Edwin. "The Ethical Validity of Euthanasia." The Journal of Philosophy at CSU Dominguez Hills Spring 2018 Volume 4 4 (2018): 11.

Smith, Patrick T. "Ramsey on "choosing life" at the end of life: Conceptual analysis of euthanasia and adjudicating end-of-life care options." Christian Bioethics 24.2 (2018): 151-172.