Essay Sample on Punitive Measures in Law Enforcement: Too Harsh or Justified?

Introduction

For the several past centuries, law enforcement did its deep focus on crime punishment based on the punitive measures. The end result has therefore called for punitive measures which are harsh and quite humiliating, intending to have the criminals deterred from their ill-rated actions. The main mistake such policing measures laid their foundation in is based on how much time has been invested to come up with such law-enforcement policies, which omits the reasoning discoveries behind why such crimes were committed by the criminals. The early chronicles of both criminology in general and of policing explicitly demonstrate a less institutional way to deal with wrongdoing. As social orders developed and advanced, criminologists started looking increasingly more into approaches to forestall wrongdoing, while simultaneously nearby governments started to play a progressively dynamic job in policing their residents. This paper shall therefore base its theoretical argument to clearly demonstrate on the how criminal punitive policies are purely a political discourse idea which lacks the perfect concept of the expected community policing qualities. The paper shall also put into consideration the aspect of SARA model process as a solution to towards proper criminal treatment concepts.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Community-Oriented Policing

This policy works under the concept of action, other than reaction. It is clearly evident that the previous responses from the law enforcement acts focused majorly on how to punish criminals instead of creating problem-solving policies to reduce the rates of crimes. However, the community-oriented policies are set under a different pitch which involves community partnerships and reasonable problem-solving measures (Clarke & Eck, 2014). The community-oriented policies thus emphasis on bringing the police professionals, the community and the government officials, and the neighborhood leadership altogether to have a common direction towards creating a common way of critically evaluating the problems that face the community with the intention of having a common goal of creating possible solutions to such problems (Greene & Mastrofski, 1988). It mulls over police impression of issues as well as the wants, needs, and desires for the network in detailing a proper reaction. Through these network organizations, police offices assemble trust and compatibility with the areas they serve. It has demonstrated fundamental in getting collaboration from bunches that in the past needed next to no to do with law implementation.

Mass Incarnation Discourse

In connection to the enlarging supervision on grassroots levels, the detained people are overseen at a more prominent expense of supervision and follow up techniques. The socialization of wrongdoing hypothesis sees probation and mass imprisonment to affect more on the negative effects of detainment as opposed to demonstrating advantageous components. These perspectives incorporate augmenting the supervision of crooks, which consequently, broadens the legal frameworks. Besides, more individuals are ensnared in criminal cases, accordingly expanding detained legal disputes. Several other supporting explores affirm the political talk of mass detainment. Guerino, Harrison, and Sabol (2011) depict the discoveries from New York, New Jersey; these investigations present an end; probation strategies equipped to advance detainment, over the long haul, make a domain where people are ensnared with related criminal cases. More to include is that monstrous detainment results to an expansion in the spread of equity conveyance to amateurish citizenry.

The point of view of a reformatory turn on detainment sees mass imprisonment based on the confusing examination test. This viewpoint show imprisonment to serve the two capacities as going about as both another option and a significant course of net widener towards detainment rate. Moreover, discipline is viewed as an apparatus to lessen the political talk of imprisonment to the detriment of sociocultural impacts, for example, legislative issues. The world of politics impacts mass imprisonment rehearses and along these lines just tries to suit the interests of the political class.

Such reforms supporting incarceration is ineffective and a costly affair to manage. The various research reviews done between the period of 1980 and 2010 supports this notion; social punishment increases the negative effects of the penal process. Guerino, Harrison, and Sabol (2011) describe that incarceration facilitated the increase in the population of prisoners in the year 2009. The research finding of the study highlighted twenty-five states within the United States, to have portrayed an increased prisoning as a result of greater involvement with the prisoners and prison cases. Major studies focus on discussion points of the punitive turn of mass incarceration includes Guerino, Harrison, and Clear (2011)," Pew Center on the States." It supports the notion that mass incarceration reduces the rate of social freedom through a study finding from the twenty-five states of America in the year 2009. The result gave conclusive evidence that the prison population was on the rise with the adoption of the probation reforms.

Moreover, in New York, New Jersey and Michigan probation reforms led to politicizing the budget issues and thereby increasing the incarceration rate. This study is the fundamental framework upon which the contradictory opinion on the adoption of probation as an aid to mass incarceration is analyzed.

Community Problem Solving and the SARA Model

The main intention of the SARA policing model as a problem solving measure is to ensure that there are long-lasting solutions that the community come up with to approach criminal activities. The SARA model is an acronym of the following abbreviations. S - Scanning, A - Analysis, R - Response, A - Assessment

Scanning includes searching for examples of issue exercises, including exploited people, areas, and sorts of violations. It requires an assessment of the issue, the impression of the issue by both law implementation and outer accomplices, and an investigation of the seriousness of the issue.

The following period of the critical thinking model is analysis, which incorporates searching for the underlying drivers of any issues or issues recognized. Data is accumulated from an assortment of sources, including wrongdoing reports and network individuals who are legitimately influenced by the, 2019 issue (Bardach & Patashnik). Reasons for issues can incorporate numerous components, including neighborhood and network view of law requirement themselves. When the reason is recognized, law authorization authorities will work with the network to think of and execute a proper, long haul reaction. After the reaction is executed, a continuous appraisal is required to assess the adequacy of the arrangement and make modifications as suitable.

The benefit that community-oriented models comes along with is to aid in coming up with long term solutions for the criminal cases that occur on daily bases. The benefit would thus bring together criminologists, the police and all other criminal justice professionals on a common table of working together in search for the root cause of the criminal activity involved. Once the principles of problem-solving policies are adhered to, there comes the benefit of a long-term solutions for the law enforcement departments which would be highly reliable in serving the community.

References

Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2019). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. CQ press.

Clarke, R., & Eck, J. E. (2014). Become a problem-solving crime analyst. Willan.

Greene, J. R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (Eds.). (1988). Community policing: Rhetoric or reality. New York: Praeger.