Introduction
The huge differentiation between the desires and the truth of the Iraq war incited a discussion on why the war turned out badly. The U.S. president, George W. Bush, contended that the vulnerability of the United States following the September 11 assaults of 2001, joined with Iraq's supposed ownership and assembling of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) (Shaver & Shapiro, 2016). The possession of weapon allegation was later demonstrated erroneous. The U.S. blamed Iraq for escalation of terror-based groups, which, as per the Bush organization, included al-Qaeda. This paper will show that the choice to attack Iraq in 2003 was a move of the neoconservative motivation, because of the air of dread made by 9/11.
The U.S's move to dispatch a preventive assault on Iraq in 2003 brought about massive global ridicule, dwindling endorsement of the Bush organization, and local disappointment, which showed itself with consequent political race results (Shaver & Shapiro, 2016). This was shown by the inability to discover weapons of mass devastation (WMD) in Iraq, the horrible abuse of detainees in the Abu Ghraib jail, and the tricky occupation. This has affected the future international strategy. Quite, this effect has directed away from neo-conservatism, returning to a more pragmatist approach.
The psychological effect of war on regular citizens and soldiers who took part in the war, such as Britain, was huge as it changed society's relationship with the future (Shaver & Shapiro, 2016). War conditions made memories and wounds that outlasted the wars themselves. Their pictures and sounds continue throughout, financial matters, political issues, and private lives through numerous ages for the officers, their families, and the people in question (Shaver & Shapiro, 2016). The war additionally resounds, in higher paces of physical and psychological maladjustment for British, the U.S and Iraqi residents. The war made social and mental conditions that darken the manner we compose history.
The war in Iraq devastatingly affected the local economy. Military spending channels resources from profitable economic exploitations. Hence, it ordinarily prompted slow economic development, higher trade deficiencies, and fewer employment opportunities (Shaver & Shapiro, 2016). It is significant that the monetary expenses of military expenditure, for example that related to the war in Iraq be incorporated in evaluating the approaches of the national treasury (Shaver & Shapiro, 2016). Significantly, general society comprehends the economic costs that were endured by choice to take part in a war or some other significant increment in military spending.
References
Shaver, A., & Shapiro, J. (2016). The effect of civilian casualties on wartime informing: Evidence from the Iraq war. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Retrieved from https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/jns/files/shaver_shapiro_2016_tips.pdf
Cite this page
Essay Sample on Iraq War: U.S. Blamed Iraq for WMDs, But Allegations Proven False. (2023, Apr 10). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-sample-on-iraq-war-us-blamed-iraq-for-wmds-but-allegations-proven-false
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Bartolome de las Casas: New World Social Reformer Annotated Bibliography
- Shattering the Union By Eric H. Walther Essay Example
- Annotated Bibliography on Zimbabwe (Rhodesia)
- Research Paper on JFK's Race to the Moon: The Cold War's Space Ambition
- Essay Example on Season of Migration to the North: Reflection of Modernism in Africa
- American Revolution: Foundational War for U.S.A. - Essay Sample
- Essay Sample on Sudan's Pyramids: Hidden Beneath a Troubled Land