Essay Sample on Growing Global Population

Introduction

The destruction of the world's forests is precipitated by our desire and hunger for land and food. With the growing global population, resources are becoming scarce, and competition is stiffer for the resources available. This has resulted in massive logging to secure more grounds for housing and agricultural land. They beg the question is that will there be forest cover shortly with the current trends? All signs are that we will soon have nothing like forested land if people manage to destroy the planet's forest area. According to Global Forest Watch, ten million hectares of tree cover is lost to deforestation every year.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Deforestation Reforms

Individuals who do not support deforestation reforms hate our environment. This logical fallacy is called the fallacy of the Straw man. This action mischaracterizes the perspective of an enemy and then targets the empty logic. In this example, the adjustments are based on the worst motivation imaginable to an enemy's status. However, to support their case, the opponent possibly has more nuanced and plausible premises. The speaker is not handling the dissent with dignity or disproving their stance by not answering certain points.

Deforestation is comparable to the holocaust. This logical fallacy is called moral equivalence. This misconception attributes small wrongdoings to massive offenses, meaning that they are both similarly unethical. In this case, the narrator compares the cutting of trees to the massacre of Jews under the watch of Adolf Hitler. This comparison is unreasonable, unfair, and unethical.

Deforestation does not cause global warming since nobody has proved it. This fallacy is called the appeal to ignorance. This fallacy works by using the premise that since we do not know or cannot prove something, it must be true or false. This is ridiculous since not knowing something is not proof of anything. Therefore, in this case, the assumption is that global warming is not caused by deforestation because no one has proved it. Due to ignorance, the conclusion is that deforestation does not affect global warming.

Logical Fallacy

Citizens must choose between conserving the environment and destroying it through deforestation. This logical fallacy is called a false dichotomy. It refers to two possibilities as the only possibilities. Everyone must conserve the environment or destroy it through deforestation. These are portrayed as the only possible outcomes, which are false.

An advertisement claiming that a particular kind of cereal is the perfect way to kick-start your day since Keanu Reeves, a celebrity, claims that is what he eats daily as breakfast. This logical fallacy is called the appeal to authority. This fallacy is premised on the view that whatever is claimed is true because the authority has stated so rather than applying any logical reasoning or providing substantive evidence to support the allegation.

85percent of Americans do not believe deforestation is a problem. This refers to the fallacy of ad populum. To convince one to think the same thing, this approach expresses what most individuals or a community of persons believe. In this case, many people are appealed to believe that deforestation does not threaten them in any way.

When your phone bill goes beyond the limit and you start distracting your mother with how math class has become hard and surprising you passed in a test today. This is called the fallacy of red herring. Here, the attention is thrown off and diverted from the main issue or attention, like in our example, the main problem is high phone bill than allocated, but the attention is being diverted by the child on unimportant issues at that particular moment. Little room is left to look into the growing concern about the high phone bill, which could be a major concern is a major concern in that household.

Kennedy’s Strategies

Kennedy’s strategies are ineffective because they are all lazy and dirty. This fallacy is called Ad Hominem. This refers to the act of attacking the individual rather than considering their arguments with merits and facts. Someone will clearly repudiate the argument by directly engaging the person’s character. Therefore, the person directly attacks Kennedy’s efforts to tackle deforestation by saying they are filthy and lazy. This misses the argument to attack Kennedy’s personality.

When visiting a new country for the first time and at the airport, the first person you interact with is rude. Immediately you notify your family through a phone message that everybody in this new country is rude. This is called the fallacy of hasty generalization. The conclusion is based on biased or insufficient facts and is drawn without sufficient evidence to support it. There is no larger sample to justify the claim

The United States of America is definitely the best place to live, because the country is better than the others. This fallacy is called a circular argument. This fallacy is said to question the hypothesis. Both parts of the argument make a similar point. The end of the argument takes the people back to the start without first proving itself. A proves B, but then B relies on A to be accurate, thus creating a loop back to the beginning. The best way to remedy circular argument fallacy is to demand for more evidence and either party being ready to accept and change their opinion.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is political to note that continuous destruction of forest cover by human activities has damaging effects on the environment. Therefore, with sufficient evidence, individuals should be able to argue in a reputable manner to find the real causes. We should avoid the logical fallacies that accompany our reasoning. There should be enough enlightenment to avoid the occurrence of such misconceptions, which limits our critical thinking and may hamper our efforts to conserve our endangered resources and environment.

Work Cited

Kuhlemann, K. “Any size population will do?’ The fallacy of aiming for stabilization of human numbers.” The Ecological Citizen 1.2 (2018): 181-189.