Essay Sample on Drug & Substance Testing: Protecting Employees & Organizations

Introduction

The drug and substance test is done to improve the safety together with the safety practices that exist within the work environment. In most of the cases, an individual who is under the influence of drugs will always put other employees within the organization at a risk. I, therefore, the rule I rule in the favor of the union because the test that the union performs deter people who are working for the organization from drug and substance abuse that might interfere with their operation and cooperation within the workplace.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Ensuring Workplace Safety: The Union's Role and Rationale for Drug Testing

There are several other signs of drug and substance testing that has enabled me to support and to rule in favour of the union perception and this include:

• It will assist the union not to hire a person who might be possessing safety risk to the company.
• It helps in the identification of the persons who have drug problems and as a result, this will enable them to recover and turn to work in a sound mind.
• In assisting the union to do their due data by assisting in the collection of data with the main intention of reducing the organization's liability and risk.
• It enables the organization to hang mostly on the employees who are responsible and value the safety measures of the organization.
• The testing process basically helps to demonstrate social responsibility of the union in regards to the communities in which they work.

Balancing Personal Privacy and Organizational Safety: Union Measures Supported

However, the union also have other measures in regards to the employees personal or private life that I support. The union tries to discourage an individual from interfering with the private life of a person making it clear that testing and thorough interrogation needs only to take place in a situation where the employee interferes with the normal operation of the organization. The employer on the argument that substance abuse is an acute problem that must be properly death with is supported from all corners. The employer together with the management rights posses clear reasons to ensure that they manage the businesses together with the direction of the working forces which include to plan direct and to take care of the organization operations. They can also, in case of employees mode of conduct suspend or discharge the employees of duties or to transfer the employees because of lack of proper work commitment or for any other existing legitimate reasons.

Conclusion

Prohibition is not always the best option to reduce the usage of illicit substances. Even if it is applied then the existing parties will always get an alternative way and the result of the same might be worse than what existed in the actual situation. Therefore education of the people together with the employees on the dangers of the usage and application of the drug and substance abuse stands to be that main reason that can help reduce the usage of illicit drugs within the organization. Even if the employer and the management rely on the same as the main reason for solving the problems then the management may not realize any positive outcome in relation to the problem of substance abuse.

References

Kumpfer, K. (2002). Prevention of alcohol and drug abuse: What works?. Substance Abuse, 23(sup1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897070209511506

Lammertink, M., Lohrer, F., Kaiser, R., Hambrecht, M., & Pukrop, R. (2008). Differences in substance abuse patterns: multiple drug abuse alone versus schizophrenia with multiple drug abuse. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(5), 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2001.00480.

Meadowcroft, D., & Whitacre, B. (2019). Do prescription drug monitoring programs encourage prescription - or illicit - opioid abuse?. Substance Abuse, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1695707