Multiple disciplines have marked the concept of importance and coping as significant variables that affect an individual's health. The two variables have been linked to the common onset of specific illness that interferes with individual wellbeing concerning psychology, social psychology, nursing, and medicine. Although various scientific pieces of literature regarding stress relates to human conditions, analyzing the relationship between the three disciplines have proved to be disruptive to some extent. Any variable has a direct or indirect impact on the other as a result of subjective sensations embedded in them. Besides, when an individual tries to express a stressful situation, the description is more of someone having specific health problems rather than stress. For instance, one will justify a stressful feeling when it is associated with some kind of headaches, shortness of breath, or muscle tension. The aspect of coping, therefore, facilitates the behavioral manifestation that may lead to some activities like crying, excessive eating, or smoking to normalize a particular situation (Lyon, 2000). Thus, the impact of stress on human beings may impair mental concentration from the health impacts and also affect an individual's problem-solving abilities in trying to normalize the situation.
Matters that relate to stress have increasingly become salient to health in people's lives. Various health surveys have revealed that a significant population in the universe regards stress as their primary health concerns. The most group that accords stress with such issues are the middle-aged population since the group consists of a class of people who are ambitious and optimistic about the future. On most occasions, the middle-aged population marks the point when people begin to think differently since various facts of life unfold (Lyon, 2000). The conclusion is because the individuals within the age bracket and less healthy have reported multiple issues regarding their marriages, worries about providing for their families along with financial constraints.
On the other hand, reports regarding perceived rewards in their intimacies and marital statuses have been less. Therefore, coping has been more protective in the middle stage of life. The nature of life at this stage is indefinite; hence the individuals are left with one option of coping with such situations and hoping for a better future regardless of the setbacks along the way. Older individuals have been reported to be surviving through dealing with various locations since the ultimate solution of specific mental worries does not exist in an ideal environment (Lyon, 2000). Thus, certain risk factors of stress in the middle age tend to have a mild effect in the late-life than in middle life since the former age bracket is used to coping life.
I agree with the fact that various groups of people have been using coping to normalize most situations in their daily lives. The induced comfort that results from the concept is useful for relaxation of mind as well as managing daily life activities that require individual mental engagements. For instance, one cannot make effective decisions on most occasions when acting amidst stress. However, the concept of coping makes everything understandable in a manner that life becomes normal as it tends to give an individual an induced comfort. The comfort has been witnessed in most middle-aged individuals who still have much to accomplish that requires an evaluated decision-making skill (Lyon, 2000). The old age, on the other hand, is comfortable as their coping abilities have become a subject of daily life hence keeping various life scenarios in the normal situation. Therefore, it explains the reason why the impact of stress is not intense on the old aged population than the middle-aged.
Nonetheless, old aged adults are always free from coping and stress in most circumstances. The group of people has developed a lifestyle that directly correlates to their situation; hence they are no longer worried about what is happening regarding the future. It reveals there is a three-way interaction between age, stress, and health as there are some conditions that automatically come with the old age, and so, they are not categorized as health conditions but a stage of life (Lyon, 2000). Besides, the former group does not necessarily have to cope with certain situations as their lives have been marked with such conditions. Therefore, the level of interaction between the three disciplines of health, stress, and coping in the old age is always dormant and unproductive. In contrast, the middle age feels the impact of concepts. It is because, during the ancient period, various life conditions become normalized by the idea of coping as the automatic default to an individual state that avails no apparent solutions to multiple problems. For instance, the frequency at which one may feel unwell at the old age may be higher to the extent of relating the condition to the number of years. In such cases, it is the coping ability that acts towards normalizing the body state to make it comfortable with the environment.
On the contrary, middle-age individuals find it quite hard to engage in some other things during stressful situations since it is always characterized by the feeling of unwell, along with melancholic states of mind. It is because the normalization ability of the concept of coping is very minimal since the situations are unique in multiple ways hence creating a feeling that there must be a solution for every problem. In an attempt to find answers, health issues such as the feeling of headaches, nausea may arise as the body is engaged in a different task.
Middle age directly experiences the cumulative impacts of the aspects of stress, coping, and health. For instance, they form one of the physical stressors that make the youths remain disturbed during certain hard situations. The stage comprises multiple psychosocial factors that control the wellbeing of an individual hence affirming the purported vulnerability of the middle age to the three disciplines. Conditions like a stroke in people have been marked as central age complications. In such an instance, the underlying factors why stress may get at such levels are the reasons of failed coordination among the three concepts (Lyon, 2000). Mostly, it only involves stress and health and concluding that. Coping has a significant impact on cushioning adverse effects of stress since it provides some kind of induced feeling of comfort that does not exist. The sentiment is majorly meant to lower the impact of stress on an individual.
Similarly, matters work, and starting a family is among the traumatizing issues that most middle-aged individuals become victims since they provide a way to coping with specific health problems. The underlying impacts of stress during the stage establishes the coping responses that one develop in an attempt to achieve a certain level of comfort. The idea of coping majorly deal with normalizing the impacts of stress at the system levels along with individual differences that tend to determine how to develop over time as per the ultimate goals. Behavioral and social scientists' results regarding the evaluation of stress on middle-age individuals present it as an intrinsic characteristic of the environment. The stressors have been categorized into four distinct stages to make it easier for the process of coping to achieve the over-riding goal of normalizing situations. The steps and groups include trauma, stressful life events alongside daily stressors or hassles (Lyon, 2000). It is essential to mark that individual differences may be part of the transformative processes in how people cope up with age and what it leads to daily life activities. A significant number of middle-aged people are relatively stable but possess high positive and low negative religious coping. Thus, we can sometimes ask the better coping strategies that change with age and the contexts under which such changes occur.
On balance, shift from coping strategies through the management frameworks that have been anciently hypothesized acts as a response to the impacts of over-reaction on various aspects of stressors. It is because health, stress, and coping go in hand as the three disciplines are used in analyzing a particular hidden situation that is not clear to people. Examining the nature of interaction among the three subjects clarifies the impacts of stress on people concerning their health conditions.
Reference
Lyon, B. L. (2000). Stress, coping, and health. Handbook of stress, coping, and health: Implications for nursing research, theory, and practice, 3-23.
Cite this page
Essay on Uniting Stress Research Across Psychology, Social Psychology, Nursing, & Medicine. (2023, May 03). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-on-uniting-stress-research-across-psychology-social-psychology-nursing-medicine
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- MSI Form Description Paper Example
- Student's Self-Assessments Paper Example
- Essay Sample on Adolescents' Experiences: Exploring Growth and Change
- Essay Example on ADHD in Children: Common & Increasingly Prevalent
- Tech Impact: Social & Cognitive Development in Teens - Annotated Bibliography
- Paper Example on Police Partners: React Appropriately for Successful Coordination
- Community Resilience - Essay Sample