Essay on Roman Republic Established: 509 BC Impact on Roman State

The Roman Republic was established in 509 BC after the ruling Tarquins manhandled their broad power as rulers and were toppled. The objective of the Roman Republic was to have a solid government, administered similarly by the patricians and the plebians, and to evade another Roman Monarchy. The Roman Republic was based on the customary strategy of trade-off, dedicated to guaranteeing the welfare of the general population. In time, the battle for power carried key changes to the customary assessments of the Republic. As territory developments carried extraordinary riches into the nation, influence hungry legislators and government authorities harbored political desire and sought influence. Political foul play and selfish-interests inside the Senate and the assemblies offered an approach to monetary disturbance. Leaders in the Roman Republic failed to develop honor leadership that was necessary to maintain the republic. After the fall of the Republic, the Roman Empire rose. This raises the historical question, what factors contributed to the rise and fall of the Roman empire? The decline of the Roman Republic was due to poor leadership and weak military system and the Roman Empire rose due to a strong leadership system and military strength.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

One factor that led to the fall of the Roman Republic was Sulla and Caesar's dictatorship. Tom (p.172) asserted, "So much seems inconsistent with prior analysis: now we have a widespread lack of knowledge of the public lawmaking process, Roman leaders concerned not to reflect but to repress, and tribal leaders who owe their allegiance upwards rather than downwards." To (p.172) articulated that after the social war, there was an influx of citizens, which made it difficult for the public law-making process to be achieved. As the author explained further, this influx caused a strain in the Roman leadership and eventually attracted new leaders who were unaware of the Roman traditional law-making practices. According to the author, the Roman Republic declined because of the power given to Sulla and Caesar as dictators affected the public law-making process. In the chapters, the authors mentioned that the there was an imbalance in the Republic and when the two leaders took leadership at their respective times, they failed to create public laws, which would create a balance. Both Sulla and Caesar's dictatorship leadership politicized and stymied the tribune Sulpicius, which aimed at restoring peace in the Republic (Tom, p.172). Evidently, that dictatorship method of leadership as well as the inability to make public laws caused an intensifying crisis in the Republic, which eventually resulted in its decline.

The second factor that led to the decline of the Roman Republic was decreased military manpower. "But it would be difficult to deny that the continuing power of the Roman political tradition and the continuing concentration of military power in Italy made it almost inevitable that if the unitary imperium was to survive, then the warlord who held on to Rome would ultimately possess it" (End of the Roman Republic, p.1). As the author puts it, Triumph required the support of a changeless military foundation in the areas to adapt to rebellion. In the meantime, Italian partnered states turned out to be progressively called upon to continue Rome's abroad military foundation. Unified states were required to contribute their local powers to Roman war endeavors. Before the finish of the Hannibalic War, it is evaluated that 2/3's of Roman military powers in the field comprised of partnered officers (End of the Roman Republic, p.1). Thusly the partners agreed to their arrangement commitments to Rome. Be that as it may, Roman commanders had no commitment to impart the benefits of war to these partners (End of the Roman Republic, p.1). Partners got neither land appropriations from vanquished people groups, nor financial bounties. The Allies in like manner ended up malcontented and started by 121 BC to request full Roman political status comparable with their job in the upkeep of realm (End of the Roman Republic, p.1). Thoughtful Roman pioneers attempted numerous techniques to acquire more prominent rights for the partners, however, fizzled, inciting a far-reaching insubordination among unified states known as the Social War in 90 BC (End of the Roman Republic, p.1). This disobedience was at last smothered by power and exchange, however the way toward incorporating united residents into the Roman state delayed as far as possible of the Republican period (End of the Roman Republic, p.1). Evidently, the stakes for Roman natives was clear.

On the contrary, a factor that resulted in the rise of the Roman Empire was the military advantage. When discussing the ascendancy of the Roman Empire Paul (p.13) affirmed, "Josephus argues that God has always honored a pacifist response to military crises: If they sat still they conquered _ if they fought they were invariably defeated." Here, the author explains Josephus's explanation of Rome's ascendancy to an empire. As the author explained further, God made it possible for the Romans to defeat the Jews because of the trust they put in him and because of the defeat, Rome became an empire. Seemingly, the Roman empire's naval power helped its development by adequately fighting off its adversaries and giving the essential security to guarantee the economy flourished. Besides that, business products were effectively open, and the exchange was supported by maritime control. The military was likewise very much outfitted with cutting edge weapons

The second factor that resulted in the rise of the Roman Empire was its strong leadership, which enabled them to take over Italy. Rome's rise from village to empire (p.1) noted, "It is debated to what extent the structures Rome created to control Italy reflect not only a hegemonial alliance but the beginnings of imperial rule." Here, the author explains that Rome defeated many enemies to conquer Italy because if its strong leadership. As he explained further, in spite of genuine mishaps, appeared to be practically relentless, these new wars came about, in just 70 years, in the triumph of all of Italy south of Cisalpine Gaul (Rome's rise from village to empire, p.1) Also, these wars consistently drove into a spin-off on a significantly bigger scale: wars against Carthage, the success of the western Mediterranean, at that point, the wars against the Hellenistic kingdoms in the East, until by the center of the second century Rome had extended its standard over nearly the whole Mediterranean (Rome's rise from village to empire, p.1) Rome made to control Italy reflect a hegemonial partnership as well as the beginnings of imperial rule. At any rate, the establishments of those later victories were laid in the early Republic. Seemingly, solid leadership and aristocracy, strong ties among first class and non-tip top, the goals of residential clashes, Rome's very own monstrous development region, and a sound procedure of union structure made it be an empire.

Conclusion

Overall, based on research, the same factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic are the ones that made Rome become an empire. The Roman empire lasted longer than the republic because of its extensive territorial gains through better leadership and a strong army. On the basis of extensive research alone, it can be argued that the Roman Empire was more successful than the Republic.

Works Cited

"End of the Roman Republic." A Companion to the Roman Republic, Wiley-Blackwell, 2006.

Ancient and Medieval History, online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=17203&itemid=WE49&articleId=369502. Accessed 22 June 2019.

Paul, Spilsbury. "Flavius Josephus on the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire." Journal of Theological Studies, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p1-24. 24. 2003. Doi: 10.1093/jts/54.1.1

"Rome's Rise from Village to Empire." A Companion to the Roman Republic, Wiley-Blackwell, 2006. Ancient and Medieval History, online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=17203&itemid=WE49&articleId=369479. Accessed 22 June 2019.

Stevenson, Tom. "The Decline of the Roman Republic." The Classical Review, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 170-172. 2007 JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4497472.