Introduction
Jennifer Lawson is an employee who is struggling to defend her job and is under pressure from the various accuses from various companies. Jennifer has worked from one company to another, where she frequently got fired due to controversial reasons. Greene's jewellery wholesale is the cause of her problems. The Company fires her following her plea to be given special consideration because of her pregnancy. She ends up in another company which manipulated her and chased her away after a week. She went ahead and secures another job from Triumph jewels where her real problem started. The previous Company decides to sue her, and she replies by countersuing the Company in defense. The cases brought different impacts to the Company due to the application of the law. This paper is going to analyze the Howell jewelry world strengths and weaknesses based on their arguments regarding their actions. It also discusses the impacts of the law assessments on the Company's business practice and the public perception on the Company regarding the scenario. Finally, it recommends how to restore the public faith in the Company and the measure to put in place so that such a situation will not happen again.
Howells jewelry world is a company that sells jewelry. The Company employs Jenifer into the Company to help the Company accesses the secrets of creating gold ever. By getting the secrets, they will be able to compete with Greene's jewelry wholesale a company. A company With which Jennifer was working previously before being fired for no reason, according to Jennifer's claims. Howells Company hires Jennifer with the condition. She had to submit the ever gold creating secrets, and she will not work for any other competing company for two years after termination of her contract. Jennifer signed the contract, and within a week, the Company fires Jennifer. Jennifer went ahead and gets another job with Triumph jewels immediately. Howells fears that Triumph will also access the secret of ever gold secrets. They sued Jennifer for breach of the covenant as well as Triumph for employing Jennifer although they knew that Jennifer was in a contract with Jewells.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Howells Jewelry World
In their arguments, Howell jewelry world feels that the Triumph Company took the initiative of employing Jennifer to compete with them unfavorably. They knew that Jennifer was tied to a covenant. The Company also sues Jennifer for disobeying the contract terms. The Company has a right to sue Jenifer and her new Company Triumph because they have both broken the law. Jennifer had signed a contract with them, and it would not be fair to work for competitors contrary to the treaty. According to law, an employee has to respect the deal with any company provided he or she signed it (Alegre, 2016). The situation validates the arguments of Howells Company. If Howells wins the case, they would probably be paid a certain amount of money as compensation. It will also lead its competitor Triumph, losing Jennifer's services which would have offered stiff competition. However, their arguments have limitations. Jennifer has countersued them for fraudulent inducement during the signing of the contract. If the Company will be found guilty, they would also have to pay some fines and that that means a significant blow to them. Their arguments also subject to interrogation, which may lead to the discovery of their intentions of hiring Jennifer. The finding may also cause problems for the Company. From the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments, there is a probability that Howells Jewelry World will lose the case because both Jennifer and her new Company attack it. Jeniffer is armed with strong evidence of the intention of the Company.
Impact of Assessment on Public Perception
Depending on the evaluation of the situation, the public will consider Howell world jewelry as a fraud. The opinion will only happen if they will be found guilty of tricking Jennifer to sign a contract with them without her consent. The perception will bring a negative impact on the Company. The Company will lose trust from people who might happen to be their customers. The Company's employees and people seeking a job from their will also lose their faith and commitment because of the fear. However, if the company wins the case, it will be the opposite. First, it will attract more customers and be able to beat their competitors like Triumph. Moreover, the Company will receive some favors as compensation, as stated earlier. The public will have faith in them, giving them credit in their businesses.
Impact of the Assessment of the Damage
The damage that the case would take can be so severe to the Company, especially if the Company will plead guilty of mistreating an employee. The Company will need a strategic plan on how to restore the faith of its customers. The strategy might cost the company time and funds. The Company will have to file an appeal if the case does not favor them. If they win their bid, it will help a lot to restore the faith and perception of people. A different strategy is focusing on the quality of their services in terms of their products and how they treat the employees. The process might take some time, but it can help. It would also be appropriate if they can give back the job to Jennifer. Although the steps might reaffirm that they were guilty of firing Jennifer inappropriately, it serves as a sense of self-correction which will show that the Company is responsible for its actions and ready to account for them.
Impact Assessment on Business Practice
Such cases can bring a lot of unnecessary damage to business practices. The business might face a drastic downfall something that any company will regret to experience. The Company needs to make its employment contracts clear and public. They should also avoid employees who seek jobs with unreligious promises. The Company needs to find legal strategies on how they can improve their services or diversify their niches to prevent risks of finding themselves in the court of law. The process might need the assistance of a lawyer who will provide professional advice in every decision they make. In the future, the Company will need to treat their employees well as a way of avoiding similar occurrences.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the scenario reflects the secret actions of companies as far as competition is concerned. It also reflects on intimidations that employees have to go through fighting for their jobs. The case serves as an eye-opener to Howells jewelry world in its journey as a business company. Regrettably, such a company can accuse of involving in unlawful acts. It is, however, the hope of the Company that the case ruling will favor them and prove their innocence.
Reference
Alegre, I., Mas-Machuca, M., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2016). Antecedents of employee job satisfaction: Do they matter?. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1390-1395.
Cite this page
Essay on Jennifer Lawson's Unfortunate Journey Through Companies: A Tale of Injustice. (2023, Feb 12). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-on-jennifer-lawsons-unfortunate-journey-through-companies-a-tale-of-injustice
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Research Paper
- Strict Product Liability: Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. Case Paper Example
- Business Law Case-Analysis Paper Example
- Essay Example on Career Growth: Reflection and Solutions
- Essay Sample on My Role in Conflict: Growing Up and Growing Apart
- Amazon: A Premier Employer Despite Challenges in HR Recruiting - Essay Sample
- The Ethical Challenges Involving Technology - Essay Sample