Essay Example on the Aftermath of War: Understanding International Conflict Expansion

When countries are involved in a war against each other, there is a likelihood that its end comes with several consequences, some of which give rise to rivalry for power and planned terrorism activities. Likewise, after the end of the world cold war, shapes of planned global attacks have significantly transformed. As well, ways in which state authorities try to curb and set limits for these conflicts that are organized by sacrilegious countries. The international conflict concept is broadening to accommodate conflicts based on ethnicity within international borders that disrupt peace and security (Snyder 2011).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Internationally, the transnational approaches of resolving conflicts after the cold war offer a critical evaluation of the evidence on the effectiveness of various strategies applicable in managing world conflict insights, especially those that are associated with the United States of America against China and Russia. Ideally, the leading cause of the conflict between these superpowers is economical and politically oriented interests on who has more power than others in terms of political superiority and economic prowess (Benvenisti 2013).

Solving these conflicts involves assessing the usefulness of various approaches, opening the analysis of trending issues from within the transnational programs that concern the era preceded by the Cold war. However, the renewal of the rivalry involving the high power between the three superpowers has brought stress in the United States of America's defense planning abilities. Based on ways of conducting high-end conversational warfare, the problem policy has also resulted in intensified technology, security, and sophisticated conventional military in the United States of America. This paper seeks to evaluate the tensions existing between the cooperation needed in dealing effectively with transnational challenges involving the victim countries. Further, the article focuses on the competition among the great powers that obstruct the achievement efforts to collaboration.

In the context of the interdependence between national and global security, we are confident that national security involves catering for the protection and defense of the citizenry of individuals within a particular state. On the other hand, global security comes from the need for nature and other activities like globalization that have placed states on conflicting situations. Therefore, such policy problems as terrorism and renewed great power rivalry have triggered the necessity of cooperation among nations. Ideally, many national demands and requirements capabilities have no equivalent apparatus and strategies to handle without help. Hence, this situation has stimulated a call for the association, cooperation, and cohesion to achieve this jointly (Trachtenberg 2012).

The world has experienced and still experiences global interdependence and interconnection between countries after the termination of the cold war. In essence, this arouses the need for transnational cooperation and cohesion towards solving the rivalry for power and terrorism among conflicting countries. Precisely, the perception of the complexity of security issues of states is one of the significant challenges faced in enhancing global security. Some situations demand that, before handling security matters as a state, the country also takes into consideration the security needs of neighboring countries. This interconnection enhances harmony between the states and interdependence whenever security strategies are being set (Benvenisti 2013).

Threat concerns for the complex securities result of rivalry among the states who fight for political superiority and economic prowess. Human security requirements have been attached to a broad aspect of national protection that is beyond military governance and threats to human dignity. Hence, it has become essential for nations to make informed attempts to introducing strong correlations with one another to discuss good global security initiatives mutually.

Countries have continued to live in uncertainties and unprecedented changes that have occurred at different rates than before. For this reason, the policy problems seem to manifest themselves in various ways to the affected states. Again, new technological challenges have been put into place in terms of communication and information within the established forms of globalization that have become a routine in the states' affairs hence modifying principles of national independence and governance. In the case of climate change, the revolution from the cold war brought many dimensions of global environmental change. In addition to technological growth and advanced living standards of people, humankind got the control and decisive influence on the global climatic changes, talk of, for example, the Nobel Prize that has taken many nations to the Anthropocene era (Snyder 2011).

The process of climate change is dawned upon nations that have already entered into new approaches of problem-solving and modern diplomacy for sustainable development based on environmental reliability. However, the coexistence of power politics after the cold war has strongly stimulated economic interests to work towards the reduction of the impact on climate change. Since we are at a crucial transnational action of climate change, the features that object to the effectiveness of activities over the anticipated decades may seem unrealistic.

Climatic negotiations are majorly involving developing countries to take the lead within the fairness of climatic conditions that have no adverse effects on the border nations. Hence, the policy problem needs the idea of contraction and convergence of the present and future dimensions of climatic change. In the face of terrorism as a policy problem, the natural attribution is underdeveloped and hence assumes many forms. There are experienced difficulties in identifying the strategies that have been developed to carry out terror attacks between China, the United States, and Russia after the cold war. Little attention has, however, been extended to extracting the knowledge revolving around the biological and technological battle between the nations (Benvenisti 2013).

Terrorism and renewed great power rivalry are economic, political, and environmental policy problems because, for one, it is a war between states that have different political strengths and capabilities. The problem comes in here when a country plans an attack one another based on economic prowess and rivalry for the superpower. Essentially, political competition is adjacent to terrorism since most of the terror attacks that succeed in superpower countries have been having state back up. Indeed, the conflict is all about competition for power, outstanding the economy of the opponent country, which, as a result, affects the environment adversely.

Research has concluded that there is a clash between the interests of the sovereignty and the demands of addressing terrorism and renewed great power rivalry (Snyder 2011). Internationally relations of the post-cold war era have made a significant shift in different situation of renewed high power. This has stimulated competition between China and Russia, and others associated with the United States of America led to international cohesion that has existed since the second world war. Alongside other considerations, the president of the United States of America, Barrack Obama's administration acknowledged the renewed great power rivalry. Immediately, he placed the national military strategy in 2017 January 2018. Ideally, America has advanced national security and defense strategy that would help in explicitly focusing on the great power contention with China and Russia. Shifting to renewed great power completion has transformed the conversation about the United States' defense issues that are related to the conflicting superpowers. Partnership initiatives and the armed forces of America and the Middle East moved to the center of discussions revolving around defense issues from terror attacks even though security issues currently feature renewed pressure on grand strategy and organizational changes relating to China and Russia (Snyder 2011).

Commonly, to provide transnational economic and military help, states have pursued various strategies by international terrorism. To achieve this, nations need to boost their willingness and capability to destroy planned on the persistence of terrorism. After the end of the cold war, the hard-power strategy has mostly favored the fight against terrorism. However, because of overreliance on the approach, there has been criticism that the effectiveness of handling terrorism by hard-power is in doubt. In essence, over-reliance on the strategy is ineffective and counterproductive because of the possible probability that violence and terrorism may prolong (Trachtenberg 2012).

In my view, provided transnational cooperation is taken seriously, then the big probability is that terrorism and renewed great power rivalry would soon be suppressed if not completely broken. Ideally, the application of counter-terrorism strategies would significantly help in propelling cooperation between nations. Also, advancing linkages between neighbor nations would promote transnational coexistence, and therefore, effective collaboration would be one of the expected results. Precisely, countries involved in these problem policies should lay down the conditions to be followed in countering terrorism jointly to enhance transnational cooperation. By doing so, states would have a bright future on matters suppression of the threats from the problematic policies.

Conclusion

All in all, this essay helps in giving a proper understanding of transnational cooperation in solving policy problems that came after the world cold war. Further, the paper has provided an evaluation of the tension in the required collaboration to deal with terrorism and renewed great power rivalry effectively. It is evident from the discussion above that cooperation in transnational cooperation threatens power interest and sovereignty within a particular state.

It may be true that states have continued to compete for power even after the cold war, and there happens to be a distrust at the global level. Therefore, global international cooperation may affect the strength of another state, especially when countries ally to fight against another country. However, the global community reserves the benefit of regional collaboration and cooperation so that there is a promotion of more significant interactions that help in building trust and confidence among nations. Apart from this, the disarmament of weapons of mass destruction would help in advancing global cooperation, especially in the aftermath of an intense terror attack to any of the countries that have been involved in rivalry or cold way.

Growth in technology, information, and communication are vital in enhancing transnational cooperation as it improves the effectiveness of strategic planning and implementation of the approaches being used. Nevertheless, national measures and initiatives towards objection of physical violence among the super countries also propel the cooperation of border countries because, in this case, efforts from every state are centered toward maintaining national security and interaction with other nations.

References

Benvenisti, E. (2013). Sovereigns Trustees of Humanity: About the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders. American Journal of International Law, 107(2), 295-333. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/sovereigns-as-trustees-of-humanity-on-the-accountability-of-states-to-foreign-stakeholders/BF1AC85B117399C48B8D416399A8CAF7Snyder, S....