Essay Example on Exploring Christian World View: Defining and Evaluating Perspectives

Part 1

There have been several discussions on the concept world view for many years ranging from Christian perspective to non-Christian perspectives. This concept has varied definitions basing on the context. For instance, it can be urged that the description of the world view can be broken into two sections; first, it is the interpretation and explanation of the world, and second, it is the application of this view to life. This paper will provide a discussion through the identification and evaluation of prepositions of ministry and leadership with a concentration on Evangelism and outreach.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This part first examines the negative perception that the non-Christians have towards Evangelism and outreach. One of the opinions is that Evangelism and outreach do not have tangible facts to support Christianity; hence, they view Christians as liars who only propagate false hopes (Tinder 1). Secondly, the non-Christian view Christians as pretenders and resists of realism in several aspects of society. For instance, Christians believe that God heals his people through prayers, which is converse to the non-Christians who insist on medical diagnostic as the only way to treat diseases.

Thirdly, the non-Christians perceive Christians as people who avoid and fear reality because Christians don't agree with some of the laws and regulations that contradict biblical teachings (Mayhew et al. 220). For instance, the non-Christians viewed Christians as people who do not like democracy by opposing laws that allow individuals to engage in homosexuality. All these negative views have affected Evangelism and outreach in Christianity (Tinder 1). This essay mainly focuses on the Christian view that the bible is the best source of authority in the world in line with evangelism and outreach theorist's view on how to improve Evangelism. Also, a close concern with be put on how the non-Christians perceive Christians as far as a worldview is concerned.

The bible has become the only answer that explains God's supernatural nature and how He created the world. According to Christianity, what is real was formed naturally by God and cannot be changed or questioned no matter the situation. On the other hand, non-Christians perceive that real things usually occur. From that perspective, the non-Christians find it challenging to explain the origin of reality, yet they believe that it never be changed or altered. This assignment utilizes Van Tillian's theory, comparing it with the Christian and non-Christian worldview. However, more concentration is on the Christian worldview based on the supposition that the bible is the ultimate authority in the world (Mayhew et al. 215).

Therefore, the supernatural realm in Christianity plays an essential role in uniting human beings and God as well as explaining the reason behind existence. There are values such as Agape love, as written in the book of John, that foundation of peace and unity in the society. Glenn Tinder raises a question that "Can we be good without God?" He answered in the subsequent paragraphs of his argument that it is complicated to live a good life without God. He asserts that love as one of the most excellent Christian values, as stated in the book of John that, "That God so loved the world that he gave his only son" is the foundation of basic laws that govern the secular world where politics is the order of the day. On the converse, the non-Christian perceives spirituality as withdrawal from human affairs and the world in general, as explained by Glenn Tinder (Tinder 1).

From a metaphysical point of world view, it points out that it involves a set of views about the nature of the world perceived as a whole. Does it attempt to find answers that are just comprehensive .such questions include does God exist? Is there free will? Hence how people respond to those questions, and many others establish their worldview. The epistemological world view basing on this ministry, the bible mandates the church for world view persuasion within specific methodological limitations under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The bible verses give the model for proper Evangelism both in the works of Jesus and the apostles.

Part 2

Van Tillian presupposition is used in this part to explain its position of worldview as far as evangelism and outreach theory is concerned. Van Tillian engages with the non-Christian based on the assumptions concerning the Trinitarian of God simply because he conceptualized that all human beings are made in the image and likeness of God and that the arguments brought on board by any person can be argued and verdicts reached upon justification and rationality of the argument. In essence, God is the one who provides knowledge, and it is crucial to understand how other people reason and perceive the world. Throughout his argument, Van utilized other believers, like Glenn. The latter utilizes the message from Ecclesiasticus 38-39 that explains how people should find time to get wisdom in this case through arguments and reasoning about bible teaching (Mayhew et al. 220).

The leadership of the society can be rational when the view of the world is best understood when both ends of the arguments will accept and listen actively without disruption. The implication behind Tillian's theory is that any argument concerning the world has a basis and should include God because He is the founder and creator of the world and every animal and human being. Both the Christians and non-Christians are made in the image and likeness of God, and their perception towards the world is controlled by God, who is the background of all creation (Murray 1). In the framework, Tillian employs the use of many concepts from Evidentialist as well as the Thomistic ideas that explain the beliefs based on the uniformity of natural causes in the world. However, Van Tillian did not assert that such a concept is justifiable; instead, he went on to use such ideas and beliefs to justify the biblical approach, particularly in the neural grounds that occur naturally. Tillian uses Thomistic and Evidentialist in transcendental arguments. The arguments involve the meta-arguments concerning a number of the principles that form the basis in which the non-Christians in various parts of the world view the world. Mostly, this kind of presuppositions goes back and forth, trying to understand the logic that befalls truth, reality, and faith concerning the Christians and non-Christians view of the world (Beentjes, 188).

Part 3

This part of the essay focus on the Christian supposition of the world view. The supposition in this regard is that Christians believe in the bibles as the ultimate authority in their worldview. The implication behind this is that most of the laws governing across the world go hand in hand with the biblical verses. Besides, the political decency in the society is shaped by what is believed to be right, wrong, evil, good, accurate, and real yet these values are traced back in the bible. These sets of values are considered as ethical consideration; hence it sets a foundation where most of the individuals view the world from. Such values and beliefs form the significant Christian teaching hence the belief that Christian faith is the foundation of rational thoughts about how the world should behave. An example from Ecclesiasticus 38-39 in the bible will be used later in this assignment to enhance understanding of the argument (Beentjes 188).

The biblical teachings in the book of John about the love of God, as also explained by Glenn Tinder in his argument, sheds light on the purpose of love and how it used as one of the foundational values of peace and unity in the society. Though the political leadership cannot achieve pure love as compared to the agape love in Christianity, the secular world tries to operate in the framework of standards that indicate love among people in society. In several instances, Christians have to put themselves in the shoe of non-Christians in cases where arguments are necessary to draw some logical connection and truth. The essence behind Christians doing so is because Christians believe that all human beings are all created by God, and Christians have to associate with non-Christians to understand their point of view and how they are behaving the way they do. Van Tillian provides some knowledge that's Christians always have to presuppose the bible's revelation as the reference book to know the good and evil in the world (Hanes, Jonathan and Andrew 22).

The values on good life, integrity, equality, and respect among others have a logical sense in them; hence they form most of the values and laws governing the society. Christians expect that any argument should include bible verses and evidence for it to qualify. Van Tillian contradicts this point of view because he believes that any human being can come up with an intelligent argument as long as it is rational and can impact in positively shaping the society. Tillian was advocating for critical thinking as far as the values and norms of the world are concerned. Importantly, it should be noted that arguments between the non-Christians and Christians are biased because one side of the argument does not want to agree and accept that the opponent's opinion can help explain the view of the world (Beentjes 188).

Conclusion

In conclusion, there have been several discussions on the concept world view for many years ranging from Christian perspective to non-Christian perspectives. This concept has varied definitions basing on the context. Christians put themselves in the shoe of the non-believers to find a basis to start their argument. Van Tillian, a theorist, concurs with the book of Ecclesiasticus 38-39 that encourages people to seek wisdom by finding time to reason and engage in conversations. The non-Christians are so resistant, and they believe that Christianity block people from thinking critically and logically hence individuals subscribed to Christianity do not allow their mind to think intelligently and provide solutions to the problems affecting the world.

Works Cited

Beentjes, Pancratius C. "Recent Publications on the Wisdom of Jesus Ben Sira (Ecclesiasticus)." Bijdragen 43.2 (1982): 188-198.

Hanes, Jonathan M., and Andrew Pinsent. "Presuppositionalism revisited: the necessity of a transcendent God for the intelligibility of science." Science & Christian belief 28.1 (2016): 20-23.

King, John B. "Presuppositional apologetics and the theology of the cross." Word & World 38.3 (2018): 282-291.

Mayhew, Matthew J., et al. "Expanding perspectives on evangelicalism: How non-evangelical students appreciate evangelical Christianity." Review of Religious Research 59.2 (2017): 207-230.

Murray, Jason Matthew. "Campbell and "Expository Apologetics": Presuppositionalism Critiques Campbell's "Original Gospel." (2020).

Tinder, Glenn. Can We be Good Without God?: On the Political Meaning of Christianity. Regent College, 1995.