Classic Australian Novels Essay

For the term of his natural life is a well-crafted novel which is arguably a romantic genre as opposed to such is Life Literature featured in this comparison essay. Uses of blissful characters have been utilized within the two novels guiding their roles and definitions differently exhibiting their different genres. In the book For the Term of His Natural Life, the three different classes of people in the society have been applied, which include the working class, the middle class as well as the autocracy class (Teuton, 2008, p. 19). In the book, Sir Richard has been portrayed as the autocracy classed member of the society with his influence in the making of the decisions in the community he is involved in. One of the characteristics that have been portrayed from Sir Richard is the ability to send his eldest son abroad. From the in-depth view of the books in the perspective of what happens, it is clear that there are some disparities between the two materials as well as some degree of correspondence.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

As mentioned above, Richards in the book For the Term of His Natural Life portrays his autocracy abilities. There is a depiction of him sending his son abroad, which shows his potentialities. However, they happen to be in similar states of affair with Richards' son squandering monies from his father while abroad. Notably, this comes out clearly from a heated argument between Richard and his son, creating a similar reality to the most of the situations that accompany wealthy families. Some of the reasons cited by Richards's son are also somewhat similar to the reasons realized with these classes of families (Bakhtin, 1934, p. 681). These reasons include and not limited to neglecting of father-son relations which should be effectively applied in rising of the boy child. Also, Sir Richard is in antagonizing terms with his wife some of the realities experienced by the accomplished and wealthy members of society.

The main problem cited by his members is the lack of involvement of their head of family in family matters which he has seemed articulated through the provision of monies. Sir Richard however does not conquer to their arguments having grown up as an orphan who had a sister to support after the death of their carpenter father who particularly involved in boats crafting. In most of the reality settings, a good portion of the wealthy class have a common hardship childhood one filled with poverty that stimulates to the acquisition of wealth trying to fill the gap their childhood memories fail. With these background, attaining of wealth seem to replace their moral values in the society.

According to the novel, Sir Richard is one of the influential millionaires in the society having worked hard since his early ages after the demise of his father which rendered him an orphan and guardian to his younger sister (Bruner, 2003, p. 72). Sir Richard has worked in many capacities while starting from the apprentice of his father's work, having crafted warships for his lordship giving him opportunities that influenced his rise to the acquisition of wealth. After years of success, Sir Richard retires and with the influence of wealth marries from a wealthy homestead with the aim of strengthening their houses, a culture that was used primarily in kingdoms. The practice was however practiced by the wealthy homes, in which sir Richards would be categorized (Roderick, 1945, p. 39). In light of an argument between Mr. Richard and his wife, use of authority is a notable trait that can be tied to the aristocratic class mainly in the expression of their stature. The relevance to retaining their proud positions in the society can also be linked to his outburst and use of authoritative words.

With the revelation of his one and only son named after him, Richard Devine, of being a bastard son, he gives condition that aimed at securing intact his reputation among his peers and more so to the society at large. One of the highlights of the argument, however, is the mention of Sir Richard facilitating his son's travel abroad, an act that associates with the wealthy in the society. Mr. Vickers is a government employee in charge of a ship involved in transportation and holds the rank of captain. He falls into the category of the middle class with him having an assured livelihood and being at a higher standard more than the working class (Burke, 1966, p. 38). Some of the traits manifested in this character is the disgrace to the convicts who are in the low decks of the ships. In this line of understanding, this may be explained by the dissenting views they hold against the wrongdoers with their thinking of the easy possibilities to acquire an honest leaving.

Also, his association with the convicts visibly explains his despise towards these members of the society who have been sentenced to years in transportation. The act of immersing himself as the head of his peers in the ship that he leads identifies with the pride he holds especially in ensuring his peers obey him (Deitering, 1996, p. 201). In an argument with one of the deck workers, Mr. Frere, he insists on the use of the required laws as per the lordship's requirement with explicit knowledge of Mr. Frere's insignificance in having changed the matter at hand.

Another aspect shown by the character is the exercise of privileges that the middle class seems to take advantage of especially since they are the minority handling aristocratic and government properties. He brings with him his family along in his sea duties tagging along his families housekeeper to utilize the limited space in the ship which would have instead served the ship workers (Argyle, 1972, p. 84). He is also a free minded soul with the consideration of giving her child education directly instead of the schooling system, to maintain high contact between his family and more so his daughter. The book also puts up the struggle in his marriage a factor that has affected this social class more compared to its prevalence in other social classes.

Mr. Frere is a ship worker in the wings of Mr. Vickers and mainly conducts the job of patronship in the ships and especially the convict section ensuring that they are working through their chains to facilitate the movement of the vessel (Lukacs, and Lukacs, 1971, p. 52). Also, Mr. Frere is involved in the technical duties required in the boat which include raising of the shore's wind conductors. His involvement with his surrounding is most relevant to people of his class with a hostile treatment of convicts before their captain with the hope of acquiring favor. From one of the conversations between Mrs. Vickers mistress and a colleague to Mr. Frere, his shyness in approaching the young girl is eminent with fear of antagonism with his heads.

Looking at the engagements involved in his practice, class mobility for him may be tangible but only limited considering the fact the fact that their job structure requires the vacancy of a space for the promotion or development of other workers to take place. However, it would be only fair to consider the rise of Mr. Vickers to the position of captain having struggled through other positions which include the one currently occupied by Mr. Frere. With light to the subjection and involvement of his job and the involvement required to satisfy job responsibilities, Mr. Frere's condition is quite similar to the reality situation where the working class are subjected to more job responsibilities in comparison to the middle and aristocratic social classes. The age of Frere is also quite relatable to the age group more visible in this group of people.

In the book, such is life by Joseph Furphy, a novel that has been strongly associated to being of romantic genre has effectively outlined the different social classes of the society with relevance to the economic activities featured in the society covered in the society, and mainly based on freight of goods. Mr. Thompson, one of the characters mentioned in the novel who is also held at high statute from the author considering the achievements and involvements that he has engaged with the author of the book through his diary. Some of the endeavors that Mr. Thompson has accomplished together with the writer are having occupied government offices in different capacities. With this revelation, Mr. Thompson may be categorized to belonging in the middle class in the society. He has also indulged in the poetry making industry explaining his commitment to leisure activities which he holds dearly with the hope to utilize the powers of his monies ability. The main activity engaged by Thompson as shown in the novel is the freight business, with him having a team of 20 bullock drivers a standard that is identified through the other bullock teams. The author describes Mr. Thompson as a quiet man with good involvements around his environs which may relate to the description of the novel of being a romantic one as opposed to realist novel.

Mr. Dixon who is one of the oldest friends to the writers is a key feature in the novel and also a key figure in the freight industry. According to the novel, Mr. Dixon is one of the great transporters of goods especially with his wide involvement in the European market. In a revelation made by the author, Mr. Dixon was one of the first business people in the freight industry to have utilized the development of the rail to have brought goods to his community from external Europe markets. With reference to the revelation as well as other outlined reasons pointed out in the novel, it would only be proper to categorize Mr. Dixon in the category of the aristocratic social class basing on his dominance in the freight industry. Mr. Dixon through his accomplished life has a son whom according to the novel has acquire an MBA in E3nglish in a well established university recognized with the well established members of society. In the diary from the author, Mr. Dixon at the particular time recorded had eighteen bullock drivers, maintaining the range as witnessed from his counterparts. In the novel, Dixon as an aristocrat is seen humble and graceful as compared to the reality of existence from members of this social class who seem to be arrogant.

Conclusion

To conclude, a considerable number of comparisons can be made between the two sets of books. From the in-depth view of the books in the perspective of what happens, it is clear that there are some disparities between the two materials as well as some degree of correspondence. For the term of his natural life is a well-crafted novel which is arguably a romantic genre as opposed to such is Life Literature featured in this comparison essay. Uses of blissful characters have been utilized within the two novels guiding their roles and definitions differently exhibiting their different genres. In the book For the Term of His Natural Life, the three different classes of people in the society have been applied, which include the working class, the middle class as well as the autocracy class. In the book, Sir Richard has been portrayed as the autocracy classed member of the society with his influence in the making of the decisions in the community he is involved in. One of the characteristics that have been portrayed from Sir Richard is the ability to send his eldest son abroad. All this has been achieved by concise analysis of the key elements in both cases.

References

Argyle, B., 1972. An introduction to the Australian novel, 1830-1930. Clarendon Press.

Bakhtin, M., 1934. Discourse in the Novel. Literary theory: An anthology, 2, pp.674-685.

Bruner, J.S., 2003. Making stories: Law, literature, life. Harvard University Press.

Burke, K., 1966. Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Univ of California Press.

Deitering, C., 1996. The postnatural novel. The Ecoc...