Articles Analysis Essay on Forest and Habitat Restoration

Does Habitat Restoration Enhance Spring Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions?

The main argument presented by the author in the article is establishing whether habitat restoration can enhance spring biodiversity and ecosystem functions in the midst of degradation of ecosystems which are dependent on ecosystems (Lehosmaa, 2015). The ecological responses which can be used in the restorations are not recognized. Forest drainage is responsible for the degradation of spring hydrology and restoration is made possible by use of taxonomic measures, made up of macroinvertebrates, leaf-decomposing fungi and bryophytes as well as functional measures where leaves are broken down so that the restoration process is successful.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The evidence the author has presented is the application of the taxonomic and functional indicators of spring restoration. Through the methods have been relentless, they have successfully restored the springs closer to the natural conditions. The restoration helped to reduce water inflow from the close by drainage ditches. Stabilization of thermal and SI composition is made possible by the ecosystem functions which depend on groundwater.

The holes which are present in the article are lack of an explanation of the factors which lead to degradation. Only the way restoration of the ecosystem is described and experiments on the processes used, yet the cause of this problem has been left out (Lehosmaa, 2015).

My opinion about the article is that it is helpful in restoring our habitat despite any destruction or degradation that has taken place. After the restoration approaches have been put in place, they help in making the places more stable; however, it is first necessary to determine how to assist the species found in the areas since they are affected by the restoration made.

Impacts of Forest Restoration on Water Yield: A Systematic Review

The main argument presented by the author is providing a review which will help offer a balanced and impartial assessment of the effects of forest restoration and an explanation of forest cover on the yields of water. Improving the services associated with water provision is common in the projects dedicated to forest restoration due to the increasing issues of freshwater scarcity. Various intervention approaches are used in association to the forest degradation, and these include forestry, forest second-growth, regeneration and afforestation/forestation (Filoso, 2017).

The evidence provided by the author on forest restoration was that most studies which have been conducted about the case reported that the yield of water decreased about the intervention. There are also other hydrological benefits witnessed about the case. Most of the studies, however, focused on forest restoration, mostly the native species. The information provided can be helpful in the humid and subtropics in forests restoration.

There are various holes related to these studies conducted, starting with bias. Since various researches were done, they could result in issues such as recommending some forest rehabilitation methods over others and some methods are even not discussed in the case. The author has not explained deeply the effects of each restoration methods used in the research (Filoso, 2017).

My opinion on the article is that it provides helpful information about the ongoing issue of deforestation and the effects it has on weather and climatic changes. Cutting down of trees also has ecological impacts, and most of the species which depend on the trees are not able to survive. The article provides methods that can be used to solve the issue.

References

Filoso, S. (2017). Impacts of forest restoration on water yield: A systematic review. Plos One, 1-26.

Lehosmaa, K. (2015). Does habitat restoration enhance spring biodiversity and ecosystem functions? Springer, 161-173.