Article Analysis Essay on Global Warming

Introduction

Global warming is a trending issue currently because world state is trying their best to curb it and ensure the earth stays habitable. However, on a scale of one to ten, I can rate the Nicholas Cortez article at 6. The issue of using paper straws is okay, but it is introduced poorly and does not have any intriguing aspect about it. The first paragraph ought to have been used to prepare the reader what the article mainly entails. However, it's about new technologies that are bringing changes in the world.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

It would have been prudent to state the reason for using paper straws and how they were meant to solve pollution on earth. For every reader to understand the issue entirely, the author would have explained how plastic pollution is causing global warming.

When the author states that paper straws are causing a lot of problem at Oregon University, the reader expects to see that problem explained below. However, there is no such information. Instead, the author describes the advantages of using paper straws over plastic ones. The author is deviating from the topics once in a while. Instance, Nicholas brings the use of solar panels in this article. Solar panels are not related in any way with the use of paper straws at Oregon University.

On a scale of one to ten, I can rate the article at four regarding its ability to connect with the target audience. The main issue is the paper straws, but the author writes many problems and therefore the reader. Secondly, the author gives one reason to discourage the student from using the paper straws. The implication of ingesting paper straws is also not discussed. Lastly, since the author is against the use of paper straws, there should be a better alternative. However, Nicholas does not offer it hence, making the article very un-compelling.

Editors Letter to the Author

Hello Nicholas, your article on paper straws has been reviewed, and it has been noted that there are changes that need to be done before publishing it in the "exchange." As I saw, the paper is focusing on the use of paper straws at Oregon University. It would be prudent to do further research and come up with the adverse implications of using paper straws.

The paper lacks a compelling aspect because you seem to be deviating from the main issue (paper straws). For instance, solar panels should not be included in the article. The first paragraph should address the issue of paper straw and also show your stance on the subject. It also leaves the reader hanging because there is no better alternative given explained.

Since the paper is focused on the paper straws at Oregon University, more information that associates the students to the straws ought to be added. For instance, the usage of the straws in the campus, an incidence that was caused by the used of paper straws. The paper should also include the health implications that have been evident as a result of using straws. For the reader to be intrigued by the article, there should be examples of people who have suffered as a result of using the paper straws. The last paragraph should be used consolidate the details of the paper. The conclusion of your paper does not summarize the content in the article.