Ars Poetica by Archibald MacLeish - Critical Thinking Example

Date:  2021-04-14 15:18:19
3 pages  (573 words)
Back to categories
logo_disclaimer
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
University/College: 
Middlebury College
Type of paper: 
Critical thinking
logo_disclaimer
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Every individual has his or her take on poetry. Some people scrutinize and go into deep thought regarding poetry while other focus on the superficial appearances that the author has presented. However, the explanation is created, and opinions are based. The poem Ars Poetica, by Archibald MacLeish is quite challenging to understand since it contains vague parts, but I think the author is trying to teach the reader on how to read a poem correctly. The poem contains various interpretation, and it is the work of the reader to understand them (Thompson).

The first stanza summarizes the entire poem. The author begins by asserting how quiet and straightforward, and quite a poem should be. The author uses similes and with examples in comparing his ideas. From the first line, it describes the fruit. He goes forward and says that poems are dumb and that they need to be effortless and wordless. Reading this stanza, you can realize that the author is an individual with a straightforward thought and a simple minded people. There is no symbolism or hidden meanings that the author has provided; the author has just focused on making the reader know his feelings on what the poem should contain. What he focused on is non-compliance in his poem, and that is what he wanted the reader to realize.

The second stanza is almost similar to the first stanza regarding the flow and organization. Through line 9-16 he states that it appears like the moon just rises and falls without being aware of it. That is what the author thinks a poem should be like. MacLeish goes forward with the comparison to the moon and the way and the manner in which it falls in the third line. I think the author the author wants the reader to know that is okay not to understand and parts of the poetry since it is just a regular thing, and it is perfectly acceptable to comprehend some few parts. He asserts that the poem is just a memory and soon it will be forgotten. In the last line of the second stanza, "A poem should be motionless in time / as the moon climbs" (15-16), he uses this to show that poem should not cause any instant reaction to the reader and should be taken just lightly.

In the third; "A poem should be equal to / Not true, it is the line in the poem that you cannot ascertain what the author intended to mean. Maybe he tries to say that we should understand the poem for ourselves and that the poem should be equal to nothing. The image "For all the history of grief"(19) displays the problems that people go through in their lives. The last lie of the stanza "A should not mean / but be." (23-24) show that the poem should not cause any reaction to the reader; it should just be read, and nothing big should be taken out of it.

Conclusively, after reading the poem "Ars Poetica, it is advisable that the reader should not just read the poem but rather to understand at an individual level. Every reader digests the poem differently and has his or her views, and the author of this poem was trying to point the reader towards that direction using astonishing imagery.

Work cited

Thompson, Aidan Philip. A poem should not mean, but be: poetic form vs. content in Algernon Charles Swinburne. Diss. University of Birmingham, 2015.

logo_essaylogo_essay

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal: