"Advocates File Human Rights Complaint to Stop Family Separations at the Border": Article Analysis Essay

Introduction

On Thursday, May 31, 2018, the Houston Chronicles published an article titled "Advocates file human rights complaint to stop family separations at the border" to shed light on the nature of the Trump's administration policy of zero tolerance to illegal immigration into the United States. This article was written by Lomi Kriel, and it is retrievable via the link https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Advocates-file-human-rights-complaint-to-stop-12958443.php.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This article reports that the Texas Civil Rights Project (TCRP) and other human rights groups across the U.S. filed a lawsuit with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), challenging the government's policy of separation of illegal immigrant families at the Border. The article states that over 60% of illegal immigrant parents and their children were detained and separated in April at the Border in Rio Grande Valley alone. From the paper, Zenen Jaimes Perez, speaking for the TCRP states that there is no democratic nation in the word that practices systematic separation of immigrant children from their parents. According to Perez asserts that It's cruel in violating international treaties and resolutions.

From my perspective, the news reporting was excellent and fair because the existing constitutional doctrines on human rights support most of the claim in the newspaper. This policy violates not only international laws but also the 1997 legal agreement labeled Flores Settlement which stipulates on the boundaries of separating illegal immigrant families. This law requires that the government does not take very long to unite children separated from their parents or guardians (Lopez, 2011). It also safeguards the fundamental human rights of unaccompanied minors.

Moreover, this policy of family separation is similar to the draconian SB 1070 law passed by the Arizona legislature in 2010 which many criticized for enforcing racial profiling of Latinos and other marginalized groups (Campbell, 2011). As a social worker, I applaud the reporting of this news article because it represents the framework established around the tasks and skills needed by social workers in their policy advocacy. Likewise, I think the article received a positive response from the general public because it embodies the genuine plight of illegal immigrants trying to enter the United States via the U.S.-Mexico border. Therefore, intervention is necessary to stop this policy of separating illegal immigrant families at the border, and this is attainable through the assessment of "Policy Advocacy Challenges" that will enable us to apply ideas to realistic cases (Jansson, 2007).

References

Campbell, K. M. (2011). The road to SB 1070: How Arizona became ground zero for the immigrants' rights movement and the continuing struggle for Latino civil rights in America. Harv. Latino L. Rev., 14, 1.

Jansson, B. (2007). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice. Cengage Learning.

Lopez, R. M. (2011). Codifying the Flores Settlement Agreement: Seeking to Protect Immigrant Children in US Custody. Marq. L. Rev., 95, 1635.