A Hanging - Free Essay Example

Introduction

A Hanging is an essay that is written by George Orwell. The short article got published in August the year 1931 in the literary magazine of Britain the Adelphi. It was set in Burma here, Orwell served in the British Imperial Police as from the year of 1922 to the year 1927, and his real name was Eric Arthur Blair. The essay describes the way humans may commit the actions of "unspeakable wrongness" at a given moment, and on another moment they will readily disregard the behaviour in the next.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Imprisoned Man

Generally, the essay talks more about a man in Burma who has been imprisoned and later destined to be hung. On a chilly morning, the man is taken out of the cell and escorted to the hung place or escorted/marched to the gallows. As they are accompanying the man to the gallows, he seems to be innocent. In a handcuff, the prisoner slightly steps aside in avoidance of treading to the puddle of rainwater, it is seen by the narrator, and he reflects it. Before he is hanged, the man repeatedly calls Ram (Orwell, 1931). The author says that it was curious until it was the time to destroy the healthy man who is just healthy like any other individual with feelings, and also conscious. The man repeatedly calls out before the action is executed and that way, the warders are shocked by this act, and this leads to the delaying of the movement of hanging the man (Rodden, 2014). Later, the mission is done, and the warders leave in optimistic, and it is clear that they are at all not disturbed by the action that they have just done. The author wrote this essay to express how it feels when the executions such as hanging are administered to the individual even without caring, whether they are innocent or not (Orwell, 1931). The author shows how these individuals suffer in instances where they are given such a punishment.

In the essay by Orwell, he is a notion shows that the killing of an individual may at later get dismissed. Within the story, the speaker grapples for a brief moment telling “unspeakable wrongness of cutting a life short when it is in full tide.”

The texts relate to me in the in different ways, including educating on how thing are supposed to be handled before coming to the final decision—the importance of listening and giving other time to express themselves among other (Orwell, 1931). The text was chosen to be analyzed since it has a moral lesson that many individuals are supposed to understand. The classes include the importance of the individuals around us and also the better way of treating others amongst others. The context in the text is historical as it is evolving around how crimes are supposed to be handled. It also serves the interest of all the individuals, including those in higher authorities. The type of genre here is narrative.

Rhetorical Triangle

Towards the audience, the attitude of the writer is showing them a dislike of how those in authority badly treat other individuals. Towards the subject, the author is sympathetic and express his feelings on how the individual is treated as if they have no right to life any more. The argument is made by the author and is relying on the subject to make the arguments. The intended audience is any individual who in most cases, does not feel sympathetic about the welfare of others. The author wants to draw their attention close to how it is terrible to execute some punishments.

Rhetorical Appeals

The author is said to have come from a background of writers where the father has been an author and so the son. The writer is credible and also write about the life situation that revolves around him. From the author perspective, he seems to like showing out and condemning the evil deeds around him. It is justified by the way he explains from the essay how it is terrible to treat others (Rodden, 2014) badly. He fights and holds that all people are supposed to be equally treated. The emotions are significant to both the author and the audiences. Logic reasons are presented from in the text including the facts where the authors show the point about how it isn't fair to execute individuals from the community without listening to what they have to explain (Rodden, 2014). The evidence given to the audience is how the prisoner in the essay later, it is realized that he had been innocent. Still, the punishment was already given to him without listening to him.

Conclusion

As an audience has been significant from the teaching on it. The text has many moral lessons, including the ways to treat those around you and many others. The book besides surprises when it comes to the rhetorical situation where the author gives the real concern that he explains being inhuman. Based on the analysis, there is a distinct disconnect that Orwell explores. The hatred in the behaviour which become unnatural and irreconcilable. In analyzing, the essay juxtaposes multiple elements of how they may be illuminated in fundamental contrast. In this case, Orwell controls the technique to remark on the opposed nature of assassination and the ways in how it can be marginalized nonetheless.

References

Orwell, G. (1931). A hanging (pp. 44-8). Adelphi.
https://piper.asu.edu/sites/default/files/orwell_hanging.pdf

Rodden, J. (2014). “A Hanging": George Orwell’s Unheralded Literary Breakthrough. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 40(1), 19-33.
http://www.concentric-literature.url.tw/issues/Orienting%20Orwell%20Asian%20and%20Global%20Perspectives%20on%20George%20Orwell/2.pdf.