Why Oral Roberts University's Fitbit Requirement is a Bad Idea? - Essay Sample

Introduction

Oral Roberts University mandatory fitness program may be of great importance to monitor students' fitness and wellness but Fitbit requirement for new students joining the University is a bad idea and it should be prevented. Thus Universities that truly need to urge their students to be sound and cheerful can consider actualizing some realistic arrangements that don't include appending wellness trackers to their students.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Self-tracking nowadays is a flourishing business with a growing number of companies who encourage the user to monitor every single aspect of their life. When self-tracking emerged, it had a lot of attention and funding from major companies. The funding for digital health companies exceeded 4.1 billion dollars, money provided by funding companies like Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins as well as corporate investments from Google and Merck. (Andres) Oral Roberts University as of late started requiring first-year students to wear a Fitbit to track their day to day oxygen-consuming action. The Fitbit following replaces the school's old end-of-semester test in which students needed to run 1.5 miles. As per Oral Roberts University, they plan to utilize the Fitbit discoveries to track the correlation between fitness levels and scholastic achievement better. Oral Roberts University has incorporated a physical segment in its educational programs for quite a long time, with understudies beforehand required to record their oxygen-consuming action physically. Presently, the Fitbit will do it for them (Irwin)

For a significant number of us paying little heed to regardless of whether we have battled with a dietary issue, this thought appears to be out and out ruinous and an immediate way to lamentable results. For instance, shouldn't something be said about students who over-workout? Numerous eating disorders sufferers have a constant need to practice for bounteous measures of time. What will happen when teachers see this data? Will it be commended or will it be a warning?

Another worry is that the Fitbit prerequisite may support examinations among students. School is as of now an unpleasant time, with students contrasting evaluations, looks, and prevalence. The Fitbit necessity fans the fire by empowering physical action correlations also. Ultra-aggressive students may want to be superior to be better than other students, building up an unfortunate association with work out. Also, how would you review wellbeing? Wellbeing appears to be unique to everybody. There is no institutionalized review or level of prosperity. With such a significant number of various body composes out there, this benchmark of "accomplishment" is out and out ludicrous. Besides, with an advanced grade book logging every student's high impact exercise focuses, students may learn about more worried than any other time in recent memory about measuring up. (Irwin)

There are issues with Oral Roberts University's program. One is that 10,000 stages are entirely discretionary. It's better than no steps at all, yet the amount of scenes a man should take in a day is distinctive for everybody, and a restricted spotlight on steps may occupy from angles like healthy eating and the exactness of Fitbit heart-rate information has as of late been raised doubt. Truth be told, the organization is confronting a legal claim that affirms the heart-rate tracker in the Charge heart-rate is inaccurate by a critical edge, particularly amid times of exceptional exercise, which is precisely what the university is wanting to gauge. (Landsbaum)

Why should this idea be discouraged? Students should have an opportunity to move on their terms. Yoga and strolling, kickboxing, self-defense. The likely outcomes are interminable. A few students like singular exercises, similar to squash, weight-lifting or running. Others appreciate gathering exercises, similar to a motion class, sports group or climbing club. Also, the physical movement doesn't need to be controlled. The University should focus on the advantages of exercise. There are such a significant number of brilliant parts of activity; Oral Roberts University needs to understand that everyone has one of a kind needs. Exercise can discharge endorphins in the cerebrum, unite individuals, fight off disease, lessen pressure and enhance general prosperity. Oral Roberts University's endeavor to decide the correlation amongst exercise and scholarly execution may require worthwhile motivation their students' pressure and influence them to see the practice as a task as opposed to as a fun movement.

Instead of focusing on exercise, Oral Roberts University could center on volunteering. Being a volunteer gives a large number of similar advantages that exercise does, in addition to understudies can organize, learn new aptitudes and meet new individuals. Volunteering at a destitute safe house, a creature clinic or a retirement home will get understudies out of their dormitories and do great. Oral Roberts University could even reconfigure their Fitbit think about as an intentional interest, gathering oxygen-consuming information from those understudies who feel great taking an interest. Understudies can profit by exercise, and everybody needs some level of movement once a day yet by ordering this program and evaluating understudies on their high-impact action, Oral Roberts University is making unnecessary pressure and rivalry that could make genuine mischief an effectively powerless populace. (Irwin)

Conclusion

In conclusion, Fitbits are beneficial for a particular reason, and this is an inspiration. They're extraordinary for making individuals to a significant degree aware of how dynamic they are or aren't. In any case, with regards to accurate estimations, they fumble. Fitbit itself affirmed this; in an announcement concerning the legal claim, the organization stated, it's likewise vital to take note that Fitbit trackers are intended to give relevant information to our clients to enable them to achieve their well-being and wellness objectives, and are not proposed to be logical or medicinal gadgets. And student's review ought not to rely upon a cheerleader.

Work Cited

Irwin, Kaitlin. "Oral Roberts University's Fitbit Requirement for Freshmen is Absurd." Proud2Bme, 2016,

Landsbaum, Claire. "Why a Christian University's Freshman Fitbit requirement is a bad idea" THE CUT, (2016

Andres, Peter. Untracked Activities: How users of fitness trackers value their generated data, (2017)