Unlock Self-Awareness: Exploring Auto-Reflection Through Psychology - Essay Sample

Introduction

The psychology of auto-reflection revolves around the examination of an individual's own conscious feelings and thoughts. It also relies exclusively on the mental state of an individual to exercise willingness and introspection to learn about the fundamental essence, nature, and purpose. This concept of auto-reflection can further be explained through different theories and models interventions. Some of these prevalent psychological theories that can be used to describe auto-reflection include the biological theory, the psychodynamic theory, the cognitive approach, and the humanistic approach.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Each of these theories provides insights on why individuals behave the way they do, and they can also be used to explain physiological problems experienced by individuals. Intervention models, however, include direct intervention, the cognitive-behavioral model, brief therapy, reality therapy, among other models such as the invitational models and the combination of intervention models (Lutgens, Gariepy & Malla, 2017). Psychologists have to understand such models to accomplish their roles. Therefore, the paper focuses on the understanding of similarities and differences between theories and models of interventions and their corresponding settings of use.

Psychological theories explaining auto reflection are essential for explaining aspects of human behaviors. Scholars have come up with a lot of theories to explain human behaviors. However, not all theories have been accepted since most of them are under scientific scrutiny, while others have been rejected (Nilsen, 2020). The theories approved in psychology have been significant in contributing to the knowledge base of human behavior and mind. Nilsen (2020) asserts that an excellent theory offers a clear explanation of why specific relationships lead to certain behaviors.

For instance, the cognitive approach argues that an individual's behavior is examined by the emotions and expectations experienced by the individual. The behavioral approach on its side suggests that the external stimuli influence an individual's behavior. These theories are used in settings of care and therapy to explain trends in human behaviors. In other words, theories in psychology are used to describe what psychologists see and how they bring change.

The theories to explain human behaviors and minds work hand in hand with models of interventions in cases where therapy has to be provided to ensure the wellbeing of the affected individuals. Models of intervention are essential for offering an opportunity to interrupt an individual's destructive life patterns. Intervention models also provide a point for change. These interventions are led by an interventionist whose main aim is to educate, support, offer guidance, and facilitate intervention.

Therefore, after examining the theory that suits an individual's behavior, the next step involves determining the appropriate model to ensure change. The chosen model is determined by the needs of the client and the psychologist's expertise since the psychologists are encouraged to pursue their professional development to determine the intervention model that is likely to bring change. Thus, the models of intervention are used in clinical settings to offer therapy to individuals, families, or groups depending on the issues they face.

In summary, understanding the differences and similarities of models and theories of interventions helps psychologists understand human behaviors and why people act the way they do. Besides, understanding the similarities and differences also ensures change because psychologists understand the best intervention models to deal with a particular psychological issue. They pick the right intervention model depending on the psychological issue or behavior at hand.

References

Lutgens, D., Gariepy, G., & Malla, A. (2017). Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions for Negative Symptoms in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(5), 324-332. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/12f1/c1c7204444511352de1e1f6df810b44afd2d.pdf

Nilsen, P. (2020). Making Sense of Implementation Theories, Models, and Frameworks. In Implementation Science 3.0 (pp. 53-79). Springer, Cham. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0?optIn=false