UK's EU Exit: Fear of Refugee Free Movement Endangers Political Parties - Essay Sample

Introduction

The United Kingdom Withdrawal from the European Union endangered the deep divisions within and between the political parties of the United Kingdom, together with rising its constitutional concerns. The exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union was elicited by the fear of the free movement of the immigrant refugees.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The public sector claimed that more impoverished refugees were taking jobs and other benefits instead of the natives. The European Union had frustrated may United King citizens by imposing extra fees on their small businesses (Hobolt, 2016 p.1267). Other people felt like the European Union had failed to create jobs. As such, the United Kingdom paid more to the European Union than it received.

The exit of Britain from the European Union was marked by the resignation of David Cameron, the Prime Minister by then of Britain who did it claiming to respect the will of the people. He said that it was better for the country to adopt another new leadership to head the United Kingdom government. BREXIT also meant that the United Kingdom, which had been formed more than three hundred years ago, would break since some countries like Scotland and Northern Ireland had voted against the exit of the United Kingdom.

There are also significant consequences on the integrity, and the political unity of the United Kingdom focused on the public sector. The fact that British withdrawal was not supported by other countries like Scotland means that they will be in disagreement for quite some time. As such, Scotland, led by the Scottish National Party, will have to organize another referendum that would regard them separate independence from the United Kingdom to maintain relationships with European Union (Hernderson et al., 2017 p.638). The above might also trigger the other member countries to do the same splitting the United Kingdom further than expected, which would, in turn, affect the public.

The withdrawal of England from the European Union also implies that the act will influence a change in the domestic political climate, thus affecting the future relationship with the United Kingdom member states (Godwin & Heath, 2016 326). It is because the public sector would begin to re-evaluate their terms and conditions for their membership. Some of the country's government leaders might also be tempted to break from the United Kingdom instead and rather maintain their relationship with the European Union due to the advantages they confirm to benefit from the union, particularly in politics.

From a geopolitical perspective, the exit of Britain from the European Union can be termed as an external sign of termination from the union. Therefore, this means that the United Kingdom will lose the financial, economic, military, and political powerhouse. The above, which were freely enjoyed by the country, for them to be reinstated means that the United Kingdom will seek to make another mutual agreement which will be closer to an impossibility. As compared in the previous times, the United Kingdom political leaders will have less participation in the matters concerning the whole European region despite directly being impacted on in one way another. Concerning the above observations, will the public sector withstand the pressure emanating from the withdrawal of Great Britain's action both as being a member of the United Kingdom and the European Union?

Research Strategy

In the study of how BREXIT impacted on the politics of the United Kingdom, I used qualitative and quantitative research strategies. The adoption of the above was due to the nature of the information that I was to collect. The strategies are the best, particularly in collecting extensive information concerning the exit of Great Britain from the European Union. Since the research also involves direct interaction with people, the strategies form the best mechanisms as they will be used to answer a variety of questions through such things as interviews.

First-hand information will be collected from the people to avoid any biases that might have developed as a result of the use of other strategies. Quantitative strategies are essential in the distribution of surveys, particularly in this technological era, where at least the majority of the people, especially in the United Kingdom, have more than two social media platform accounts. Using both qualitative and quantitative research provides a larger platform for access to information, not only from people but also from secondary sources that have been collected and analyzed.

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Used

Some of the qualitative methods used in the research include the use of the focus group. Here, the interviewer talks with a targeted group of individuals concerning their thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, and opinions regarding the exit f Great Britain from the European Union. In most cases, the participants will be comprised of people that share a joint income, education, nationality, or even careers. The research will also enhance the use of surveys among the various United Kingdom member countries in a bid to concrete results used to make predictions of the outcome.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Advantages of Focus Group

In the use of a focus group, it is expected that it will provide the measure of the reaction of the participant towards the political effect on the United Kingdom on the existence of Great Britain from the European Union. Since the focus group targets a specific group of individuals, it will help in the identification in the opinions of each in respect to the category of each such as those composed of a particular level of education, those in specific professions, among others (Pontes et al., 2018 p.17). In a focus group, it usually involves a good number of individuals there making it easy for the researcher to collect much information within a short period. Therefore, a lot of data can also be analyzed at once.

Disadvantages of Focus Group

On the other hand, the focus group act of comparing the opinions of individuals in different categories might be efficient enough to cover all aspects regarding the exit of Britain. The members of a particular type may fail to express their genuine opinion concerning the topic. In most cases, they will be hesitant to express their honest personal views because they might be opposing those of other participants (Douglass and Carlese, 2016, p.13). There are also higher chances that the category that will be selected for collection of information and data might not represent the entire voice of the United Kingdom citizens since some of the people will not be captured while others have been listened more than others.

Advantages of Surveys

Surveys are simple and easy to use, especially with the advancement in technology, where various software can use to generate results. Since most of the United Kingdom citizens are available online on different social media platforms, the research will be able to collect the information online (Antwi & Hamza, 2015 p.7). The geographical coverage is also significant to facilitate the collection of enough data and information for the research. As compared to other data collection methods, surveys will take less time in preparing and distributing them remotely via mobile devices, mail, and other platforms.

The above will reduce geographical dependency that might temper with the accuracy of the results. Since the United Kingdom is composed of many people with a large geographic area from which opinions of people should be collected, surveys will form the best method. Reviews also allow for the collection of extensive information due to the capability of asking many questions regarding various things on BREXIT.

Disadvantages of Surveys

Surveys might fail to capture the majority of the people based on the fact that not everyone is available on social platforms if online methods were the only ones used. Lack of information concerning the existence of Britain from the European Union might influence the giving of wrong information to the researcher from the respondent. Surveys that have close-ended questions might not capture all information; thus, they have a lower validity rate as compared to other methods.

Ethical Considerations of the Research

In the course of carrying out the research, some ethical considerations will have to be adhered to to maintain standards and for the benefit of both the participants and the researchers. Some of the factors include confidentiality and anonymity of respect. The opinions suggested in the research by the respondents should not be singled out and attached to the respondent. It is to keep the privacy and confidentiality of the respondents. As such, he or she will stay and withhold the amount of information that he needs.

Secondly, despite the kind of information given regarding BREXIT, the respondent should not be subjected to any type of threat or harm with his dignity made a priority always. The researchers should also not force the respondents into giving their opinions or information concerning the exit, but rather, it should be voluntary and with a granted consent. No attempt of persuasion or deception should be conducted to gain the trust of a respondent.

References

Antwi, S.K. and Hamza, K., 2015. Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), pp.217-225.

Douglas, K. and Carless, D., 2016. Relational possibilities through arts-based methodologies: [Re] presenting focus group research with female Olympic athletes. Psychology of Women Section Review, 18(2).

Goodwin, M.J. and Heath, O., 2016. The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregatelevel analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), pp.323-332.

Henderson, A., Jeffery, C., Wincott, D. and Wyn Jones, R., 2017. How Brexit was made in England. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), pp.631-646.

Hobolt, S.B., 2016. The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), pp.1259-1277.

Pontes, A., Henn, M. and Griffiths, M., 2018. Towards a conceptualization of young people's political engagement: A qualitative focus group study. Societies, 8(1), p.17.