"The Death Penalty: A Multi-Level Analysis of Public Opinion" Article Analysis Paper Example

How Well the Article Was Written

The article on the death penalty: A multi-level analysis of public opinion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, by Burgason and Pazzani, 2014 examines the public opinion over the controversial topic on the death penalty. The author provides an opinion on the need to carry out comprehensive research using the best research that the government through the department of justice should seek to analyze the public opinion in line with the above topic of the discussion. Death penalty within the United States continues to receive more support from members of the public. However, research shows that the same kind of support has declined over the time as people see that kind of punishment to be more of inhuman. Simple advantages and disadvantages will not be enough to help make a valid decision in line with the topic of discussion. The author's argument in the entire discussion seems to be more relevant to the topic of discussion given that it covers key elements in line with topic public opinion over the controversial issue of the death penalty with America.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Biasness of the Article

The article is not bias given that it covers key aspect based on the topic of the discussion. Besides, the article analyzes public opinion based on the respective ideas and views from the public. Given that the article analyzes opinion of the public is an indication that it is reflective of the social happenings to member's public in line with the topic of the death penalty. The research conducted and the opinion of the people was from a larger geographical coverage. The opinion of the study involves a larger sample size, and the respondents were given a chance to present their views on the key matters of the discussion on the public opinion towards the controversial issue of the death penalty. The generalization of the above study also seems to be fair enough and elaborate. The author of the article uses statistical analysis to present the views in the manner that the reader can understand and come up with a conclusion. Based on the nature of the article, it can also be used for future research given that the source is a peer-reviewed journal. The writer has also used a larger sample size to enhance the credibility of the information.

Mission Relevant Information

Even though the article was coverage enough and have diverse views of the respondent and from members of the public, on the other hand, the author failed to consider the aspect of gender rules in coming up with the idea. Besides, it could be important that the author consider other tools for the research analyzes. Most importantly, the method of data collection could not give everyone a chance to present the opinion is in the best interest for the research. Besides, I would advise the writer to avoid cases of generalization of ideas or points without citing the source of information. Besides, it could be important that the writer come up with a detailed conclusion in line with the nature of the research findings. I would also suggest that it is important that in the subsequent writing, the reliability of the source of information should be of great values.

Reference

Burgason, K. A., & Pazzani, L. (2014). The Death Penalty: A Multi-level Analysis of Public Opinion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 818-838.doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9261-7