Screening Tools That Internet Service Providers Can Employ in Regulating Web Content

The article presents findings that YouTube relied upon before making a decision to screen videos for malice and negative propaganda. Therefore, the reader believes in the entire story due to its accurate background. There is also an example of a creator who was affected by the latest axe by YouTube, meaning that the screening is already at work.

Skills developed

The article has informed me about the screening tools that Internet service providers can employ in regulating web content. I have also known that making a decision to regulate Internet material is a corporate social responsibility that a company as big as Google must observe.

Source: Wilmer, S. 2017. Youtube is taking away freedom of speech for company advertisements - University Star [online] Available at: https://star.txstate.edu/2016/11/youtube-is-taking-away-freedom-of-speech-for-company-advertisements-2/ [Accessed 14 March 2018]

Validity

Adhering to set terms and conditions comes out as a central theme in this article. The content of the article is valid due to its emphasis on working by the set rules and regulations by a multinational company that owns most of the material broadcast on the Internet. The reading is valid for any creator who wishes to popularize themselves of YouTube alongside making money.

Key findings

The article's author notes that companies prefer certain Youtubers to advertise their products. However, the creator must meet the minimum content attributes for them to get hired by advertisers. As a result, creators are forced to purge profane or sexual content from their videos in order to make money online.

Reliability

The article was published in 2016, and the broadcast information is still in use today. YouTube still screens videos for malice and profanity, and there has been more responsibility by creators to meet the set regulations.

Skills and knowledge developed

Some of the information that the article adds up to my knowledge about the Internet regulation includes the right of the Intent provider to curtail the freedom of speech if it is a threat to national security and peaceful coexistence between communities.

Source: Allton, M. How to ban trolls and bots from your Facebook page - The Social Media Hat [online] Available at: https://www.thesocialmediahat.com/article/how-ban-trolls-and-bots-your-facebook-pageValidity

The article is valid because it explores a common nuisance among Facebook users. Often, people get annoyed by countless "spammy" comments that flood their wall a few seconds after they update their status. The article takes users through a step-by-step process of eradicating this nuisance.

Key findings

Many Facebook users have cried foul over the comments on their posts that are not relevant to their topics. The author of this article samples several responses from users who have been victims of this unwanted automation. The author notes that they support automation, although they are also against automation that is "spammy" and irrelevant.

Reliability

This source cannot be doubted. It is the work of a renowned tech blogger in a popular website. Although the article is not dated, the issues that it raises are incessant problems that Facebook users come across on a daily basis

Knowledge and skills developed

I have learnt that marketers automate comments to popularize their products. I have also known that the spammers hope that Facebook users would become their fans once they find numerous comments by the marketers. I am also conversant with the process of removing bots and avoiding spamming message that appear on my Facebook account