I agree with the author that religion statements are just emotive because they cannot be justified. According to Thomas all religions in the world are set to terrify and enslave humankind as well as monopolizing power and profits (Paine and Conway). The author expresses his opinion about religion, and he does not force those who believe otherwise to concur with him, but they should stand wherever they are as long as they can pursue their happiness. Every human being should be happy as he/she continuous to practice his faith to his God but should not be oppressed by the religious leaders as well as the government. In this regard, all religious leaders are ready to lie for their own benefit, and this immoral has been produced by the society as individuals to try to gain valuables for their selfish gains. The argument of the author is justifiable because he gives several reasons for his stand concerning the religion. The view of Thomas is that the government and religion reinforces one another such that if the system of the government is altered, it would be followed by a religion revolution (Paine and Conway). The human kind would go back to believe in an unmixed, unadulterated, and pure belief in one God, and nothing else. The author mostly major on the emergence and existence of Christianity as the most dominant religion system in the world.
The argument of Thomas is extended to a point where he would like to have the justification of some common phrases in all religions. For example, he would like to know why Jesus and Mary did not write the story of their life but other individuals are responsible for reporting the hearsay of their lives. All religion has some special missions that God has sent them to pursue, but according to the author, he does not understand why the path to God was not open to every human being but only to a few individuals who claim to have been sent by God. According to the article, the revelation that God sent particular people and not others ceases to be a revelation when it delivered to the second and third person by the first one. The folks who do not receive the revelation directly from God do not have an obligation of believing it. The article could be extended to give reasons for those mischievous events that took place during the beginning of the Christianity. The author needs some explanations as for why after the Satan thrown in a pit later comes back and tricks Eve to eat the apple, and that was the start of suffering for humankind. The Satan did not receive any form of punishment for his actions, and instead, he was given the power to punish other human beings such as those who believe in Mohamet (Paine and Conway). But the writer fails to address the fact the Satan and God is two different entities who differ in their mission on this planet. To sum up, the revelation the Son of God was brought to earth to bring back man close to God.
The work of the author is succinct and use clear examples to elaborate his points. This makes his work to be understood by any reader. The author does not leave any statement unelaborated or backed up by an example. The author wants to prove that Christianity is a myth since many fables have been brought up to get to back the claim of the existence of God. To prove this, he gives an example where Satan comes from a big pit inform of serpent or snake deceive Eve to eat an apple, and this was the beginning of all humankind sufferings (Paine and Conway).
The argument is compelling, fresh, and insightful since it contains all the fundamental element of an argumentative essay. For example, in the claim that the revelation is the words of God, he says there is no clear proof to show that these are Gods words. According to him, revelation can only be revealed to a person who did not participate in the action or one who does not know anything concerning the action. But the revelation of the Bible claims that man was there, and in some cases, he participated in those events. Hence this can be termed as pure revelation since the one being informed about the action participated in those activities. Furthermore, there is nobody to make those revelations about God, but it is only us human beings who can take that responsibility of revealing the claims to one another. The article is insightful because be it enlighten the reader on various sections in the revelation where there is no adequate prove to show the relevant of the information. For example, when Moses was given the Mosaic account he does not claim to have received an account, but third parties come into play to explain the existence of such events (Paine and Conway). The story that is given is not clear and begins abruptly like a traditional one. For instance when they claim that, the Lord spoke to Moses, saying. This statement does not make us believe there was such an event and if it did happen, it might be of no use to us today. The author should have looked the event from a different perspective such as when the government executes all its development programs, but there is always a third party such as the media to report those actions. Moreover, the article is more interest due to such claim where the author uses adequate logic reasoning to support his claims. In the fable of Samson and Delilah, there was no need for such revelation since even if it happened, it is of no help to us today. Additionally, Samson does not report himself or his secretary if he had one. Such analytics which the author uses makes the article more interesting.
The writer offers his analysis from an unusual perspective in that he views thing in a way that a layperson could not have viewed them. He reports all fables in a sequential manner to enable him to come to a conclusion. He claims that fables are combined from ancient times and voted for to determine which book or stories to be eliminated from the book of revelation. He claims some books such as Apocrypha were not voted for hence the reason why they are not in the current book of Revelation (Paine and Conway). The writer fail to show why some books or stories were voted for and why others were for voted against or why they did not garner the required number of votes. The author is very critical he his work and gives clear evidence or argument to show that some religious claims have no position in the modern society. But he fails to show has why the fables can such as that of Samson be used to teach the society moral standards.
The author gives all the relevant evidence to prove that Christianity is intended to oppress humankind but also receives a room for his claims to be refuted by whoever has adequate evidence to show that oppression exists by the will of God. The author tries to give all reasons that the Christianity is driven by the avarice of the priest and other relevant stakeholders such as government. He claims that religion should exist for the welfare of man; he fails to address the charity work and other kind activities that the church offers to the society. Some of the activities that the writer fails to address are education programs that it offers to the needy, providing homes for needy kids as well as providing essential institutions such as schools and hospitals.
Paine, Thomas and Moncure Daniel C. The Age Of Reason. 1st ed. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2004. Print.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal: