Response Essay on Article About Elevator in Hawley Residents

Scaled Responses

I would rate this piece of writing at 6 a scale of 1 to 10. To the audiences of OSU and The Exchange readers, the document contains crucial information about the elevator and its usage in the building. It is evident that many the users of this system inconvenience others leading to time wastage. For instance, those living on higher floors are concerned on the time wastage that they experience while waiting for the elevator to come to the ground floor to pick them. Its usage by those in the first, second, and third floors seem not to be right according to those on the higher floors.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Also, this piece of writing would be rated at a scale of 5 on a scale of 1 to 10. The rating is attributed to language use, the tone used by the author to express the discomfort, and the style of writing adopted. In attempting to connect with the target audiences of The Exchange, the writing is average in articulating its issues. The writer seems to be angry while writing these issues down. For instance, from the document, it asserts that "But if you are using the elevator to get to the second floor because you don't want to walk a flight of stairs than that is rude to everyone's and waste time." The statement depicts the angry mood and tone of the writer. Despite the writing demonstrating heavy sentiments on the suffering people are facing, it is too personal in the other dimension. Thus, this writing is not effective in its capacity to connect with the audience of The Exchange. Most of the information is too personal, and the audience may not take it with much weight as it may be expected by the writer. In this case, the language, tone, and style should be altered a little to attract the attention of the listeners.

Formal Editor's Letter to the Author

It is with much appreciation to acknowledge that the editor's department has received your complaints that need to be published. Also, the issues are seen to attract feud among the users of the elevator which is a prerequisite for time wastage. For instance, the report indicates that individuals living on the higher floors especially from the fourth one have experienced delays in using the service. Many people have disregarded the use of stairs to their respective destinations even those in the nearest ones. The problem has affected Hawley residents that inconvenience those living on higher floors.

Additionally, there is another problem that arises when one experiences delays and opts to use the open stairs. In most cases, delays that happen when one becomes impatient after waiting for the elevator to stop at the specified floor. The decision to use the stairs does not make the lift to stop at the expected station. Thus, it means that it has to reach the specified floor and make a stop before proceeding to the next destination. The decision happens mostly among those within the lower floors who inconvenience those going to higher floors. Undoubtedly, all these situations cause delay problems among the Hawley residents. However, this issue is likely to attract varied opinions from the affected persons.

Evidence-Based Feedback to the Author

Despite the serious issues that your document addresses, I do not think it is compelling enough to be published. Such challenges can be dealt at the residential level without involving the editors. In addition, the information from the document is too personal which makes it hard to proceed with it. Therefore, I suggest that you address the issues clearly and avoid personal feelings in it. After that, the editor's department will proceed with its submission for publishing.