Research Paper on Pakistan and the United States Intelligence Agencies

Introduction

The United States intelligence agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency conducts foreign intelligence and it is a key intelligence service to derive significant comparison with the Pakistan Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI). The intelligence units in the United States differ significantly with ISI in their method of operation and their coverage. The United States Intelligence services have not had a connection with terrorism like the ISI. Importantly, ISI and the United States agencies differ significantly in beliefs and ideologies.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The Inter-Services Intelligence unit in Pakistan focuses on collecting and analyzing information from all over the world. ISI collects data on domestic intelligence, performs military surveillance and participates in war operations and covert activities (Kiessling, 2016). The Pakistan ISI collects information through the use of Signal Intelligence, a method involving intercepting information on monitors from neighboring nations. The ISI has several departments including the Joint Intelligence X responsible for the overall coordination of the organization operations. Also, the Joint Intelligence Bureau responsible for political intelligence and Joint Counter Intelligence Bureau that conducts operations in Afganistan, Central Asia, and the Middle East.

Differences Between the United States Intelligence Agencies and the Pakistan Isa

The Pakistan Inter-Service Intelligence unit is a paramilitary organization. ISI comprise officers drawn from the three military branches of the Pakistan forces including the Army, the Navy and Air Force. In addition to the army officers, the agency recruits' civilians who get trained in conducting intelligence. On the Other hand, the Central Intelligence Agency engages case officers selected from the civilian population and who are not connected to the military and whose work revolves around entirely collecting and analyzing intelligence information (Richelson, 2018). The Central Intelligence Unit does not have a responsibility to assist in law enforcement.

The United States uses the Human Intelligence method of collecting information that makes it differ significantly with the Pakistan ISI that makes use of signal Intelligence. Human intelligence includes obtaining information from human sources (Richelson, 2018). The intelligence personnel uses sensitive means that strike a conversation and facilitates the collection of information. On the Other hand, signal intelligence involves intercepting communication through communication and electronic intelligence.

The ISI has an extensive network and has representatives in almost all the countries in the world. The large network of spies makes it a supreme agency compared to other nations intelligence unit such as the united states central Intelligence Agency. The different divisions in ISI cover different countries, for instance, the Joint Intelligence Service covers India, the Joint counterintelligence branch covers Russia, Asia, Isreal, Middle East and Afganistan (Kiessling, 2016). The presence of ISI in most of the countries makes it better placed to initiate the necessary measures in the advent of threat against Pakistan.

The ISI has got no comparison with the Central Intelligence agency regarding adherence to ethical principles and the desire to deal with terrorism. The ISI is known for hiding Osama Bin Laden the founder of the Al-Qaida movement, the terrorist group that conducted the September 11 attacks and other attacks on countries that were alleged to be suppressing the Muslims from the Middle East (Kiessling, 2016). The Intelligence Service is alleged to be hiding Ibrahim Kaskar, the man behind the organization of the Mumbai bomb blast.

The ISA has worked to protect Pakistan move to harbor nuclear weapons that the United States and its intelligence units are devoted to abolishing. Pakistan is surrounded by enemies including Iran, India, China, and Afghanistan. Pakistan has responded by developing a nuclear arsenal that can lead to massive loss of lives in the eruption of war (Kiessling, 2016). The ISA intelligence service serves to maintain the nuclear program by collecting any information from foreign countries including the United States to destroy their nuclear base.

The ISI officers have contributed to training militants to participate in the Taliban movement in Afghanistan while the Central Intelligence Agency is not known to support militants against particular countries. The militant groups trained by the ISI have been declared to be terrorists' groups by the United Nations Organizations. They include Jaish-e- Mohammad, HizbulMujahideen and the Haqqani Network (Roggio, 2016). The ISI is known to participate in training militant who have significantly impacted to deteriorate peace in India.

The ISI has proved ineffective in preventing conflict in its soil and working against some of the civilians. The ISI contributed to the formation of the Al-Badr who collaborated with the Pakistan military to kill millions of individuals in East Pakistan (Roggio, 2016). The war contributed to the division of East Pakistan by the declaration of Bangladesh state. On the other hand, the Central Intelligence service works to protect the lives of all civilians by providing timely and intelligent information.

The ISI has supported the spying on its citizens, and it has interfered with the process of actualizing democracy in Pakistan. ISI participated in torturing and killing of a vocal journalist by the name of Saleem Shahzad. ISI operations have comprised issuing threats to Pakistan nationals living in the United States that they may not issue any secrets about the Pakistan government (Roggio, 2016). The ISI has provided itself as a strong propaganda tool that counteracts its government and deters the process of actualizing democracy.

On the other hand, the Central Intelligence and other intelligence services in the United States have served to promote the government aim of unlocking the full potential of a democratic government. Intelligence units in the United States allow the fair play of the media sources as an instrumental tool in informing the public about political matters. The USA intelligence service does not spy on innocent individuals who do not pose any threat to public security (Richelson, 2018). The United States intelligence provides information about internal threats that may affect the country security through internal wars.

The Pakistan ISI comprises a high number of Muslims, and the organization upholds the doctrine of Jihad. The belief in Johad contributes to the ISI tendency to sympathize with terrorists (Kiessling, 2016). On the other hand, the United States Intelligence units are not inclined to any religion, and the neutrality of their approach has been instrumental in protecting the lives of all citizens regardless of their religion. Importantly, It has prevented the United States entry into wars in other countries against either Christians or Muslims.

Conclusion

Overall, the Pakistan Inter-Service intelligence and the United States intelligence differ significantly in outreach. Pakistan is in constant fear of attacks from other countries including India and Afghanistan making them send their intelligence officers to the different countries. The fear of threat has contributed to their manufacture of nuclear weapons that the intelligence agency seek to protect. The Inter-Service intelligence unit also conducts operations in spying on Pakistan nationals living in the United States.

References

Kiessling, H. (2016). Faith, Unity, Discipline: The Inter-Service-Intelligence (ISI) of Pakistan. Oxford University Press.

Richelson, J. T. (2018). The US intelligence community. Routledge.

Roggio, B. (2016). Terrorists as Strategic Assets. Hampton Roads International Security Quarterly, 15.