Rebel Leadership Essay

The rising of rebels in various parts of the world has been consistent for quite a long period and has been attributed to various factors. This paper outlines the various rebel leadership structures in few selected countries across the globe and further explains whether the leadership structures were subject to change. The following are the forms of rebel leadership structures in different countries and the reason for rebellion. The scramble for power and wealth was the cause of conflict in Libya resulting in the uprising of rebels who gang up against the government which was led by the late Muammar Gadhafi.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The structure of the rebel leadership consists of three organs by which every organ was tasked with different work to accomplish within a stipulated time. The rebel leadership was very secretive and difficult to establish the center of the rebel power easily. It was led by two nominal leaders who were responsible for the forward movement of the rebellion. The role of the prominent leaders who were referred to as the rebel executive council was to organize for meetings and the assembly of the major weapons which would otherwise determine how the rebels would conquer. The second organ of the rebel leadership was the army commandants which was a small cadre of individuals. Such group was tasked with coordination and maintenance of powerful armies that would rebel successfully against the incumbent government. The third organ of rebel leadership encompasses the adversaries who were tasked with organizing for troops that would take against the incumbency (Qazi & Shehzad 580). They were also responsible for leading the front line rebels The structure of the rebel leadership was not to subject to change over time, but the leaders who were serving different role were sometimes changed, further change attributed by the death of the rebel leaders. Such occasion was evident when one of the rebel leaders was shot dead, and there were immediate reshuffle and replacement of the commandant.

The conflict and civil war by the rebels in Syria were attributed by the long-serving government that was adamant and was not ready to leave office. The government that was in place had served for a very long time since the 1970s. The rebel groups were led by a type of leadership which was considered strong and able to ouster the government. The information about the rebel leadership in Syria is limited, but the much gathered helped in understanding the leadership structure and whether there were major changes (Wood 42). The leadership incorporation of the rebels consisted of the supreme joint military command which had a mandate over five liberation fronts to oversee their function in mediating rebel group's movement. The leadership was democratically mediated.

The Free Syrian army consisted of a large army of about 50000 fighters (Cordesman 76). Such factors did include the unknown number of the brigades the army had. The brigades had the power to assemble and lead the army troops in the rebellion movement. The second leadership incorporation is the Syrian liberation front. The soldiers served directly the orders given by the supreme joint military command. Such factors consisted of quite many fighters and brigades. From the war, it is known that the approximately 37000 fighters and about 20 brigades were responsible for running the Syrian liberation front. Such factors included every civilian liable and had the wiling to remove the incumbent government which wasn't ready to leave office after a very time of service.

The third front was the Syrian Islamic front; this had about 13000 fighters and around 11 brigades (O'Bagy & Elizabeth,). They included the Islam community who had the passion and willingness to boot the government out of office. The last organ of the leadership of the rebels was the independent brigade alliances. Although the rebels seemed to labor independently, they worked in collective efforts closely with the supreme joint military command. The independent brigade alliance had experience with a number of fighters which proved to be more difficult for the government in place to easily counter the rebels. Moreover, within the independent brigade alliance, there were the independent battalions which also had an unknown number of fighters and brigades (Tarzi & Shah 480). The rebel leadership had another arm which was referred as the jabhat al-Nusra which had about 600 solders. The rebel leadership did change at all throughout.

The leadership structure of the rebels in Afghanistan consisted of the one leader. The leader was considered as the sole decision maker in the rebel group. The ideologies the leader had a decision made were followed by the rebels in their fight against the US army and their policies. The organizational structure had a diversified military apparatus and a quite comprehensive governance structure (Sindre 506). The system of leadership had the shuras which represented the organs and the commissions, the departments and the offices which are the executive ones. The kind of rebel leadership in Afghanistan was simply formal power. The shuras were distributed to operate in various regions and serving different roles.

The Quetta shura had its authority operate in Miran Shah Shura, and they function exclusively in recruiting and formation of the fronts from the eastern tribes. Another headquarter is the shura of the north, which consisted of several fronts including three large ones. The marshland shura headquarters was located within the central force as the largest camp for the soldiers. The Rasool shura is also one of the headquarters of the rebel leadership system that consists of several fronts which assist the other locations in performing its duties mandate in time and perfectly. The structure of the rebel leadership became increasingly fragmented, and many changes were done the form year 2007 onwards (Welsh 257). Such scenario was due to the later infighting and of traitors who were working with enemies to subdue the efforts of the rebels. It was also due to lack of collaboration between each other. In general, the several headquarters which are referred, to the shuras are distributed across the entire nation to enable proper coordination. Such factors also help the sole leader to unify rebellion as the whole movement together.

The conflict in Egypt was due to the consistent rise in the levels of poverty, the increasing number of unemployment amongst the youths and the government inability to curb corruption. The type of rebel that rose in Egypt was democratically mediated, and the movement involved several large groups of people. The rebellion was conducted and everyone regardless of the race, whether poor or the rich. They all matched to the streets and the squires seeking the removal of a long time serving the president. The Egypt military soon took control and provided the leadership system. The labor activists also played a very critical part in the providing a form of rebel leadership.

The nascent party was also inclusive as one of the leadership of the rebel. The nascent party was led by the Mohammad ElBaradei's (Kenney & Thomas). The Tomorrow party also came in as part of rebel leadership against the incumbent government which was accused of being arrogant on the people needs. Within the short period of the rebel movement, the leadership did realize a meaningful change. However, there were so many who came out to include themselves as part of the leadership.

Conclusion

In Pakistan, the rebel leadership structure consists of a complex form of government. They consist of various subgroups from various tribes in the entire country. The rebels are led by a small cadre which oversees the purposely decision made which the rebels on the ground follow. The leaders take advantage of the poor and recruit them to their troops which serve to increase their bargaining power (Lacher 148). Moreover, there are several organs which are liable to the small cadre of the individuals who are in charge of the rebel groups. Such factors include brigades who lead the several troops and the fighters in their fight against what they don't want. The disputed territory that is not addressed by the government is the root course of all the conflict and the uprising of the rebels in the Pakistan nation (Weinstein 600). This type of rebel leadership whereby the small cadre of leaders take charge of the rebels has not significantly changed, but there is emerging information about a single leader unidentified who is mediating the functions, and also providing the financial aids which is critical in the running the whole rebel movements and activities.

Works Cited

Cordesman, Anthony H., and Martin Kleiber. Iran's military forces and warfighting capabilities: the threat in the Northern Gulf. CSIS, 2007.

Kenney, Jeffrey Thomas. Muslim rebels: Kharijites and the politics of extremism in Egypt. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2006.

Lacher, Wolfram. "Families, tribes and cities in the Libyan revolution." Middle East Policy 18.4 (2011): 140-154. O'Bagy, Elizabeth. The free Syrian army. Institute for the Study of War, 2013.

Qazi, Shehzad H. "Rebels of the frontier: origins, organization, and recruitment of the Pakistani Taliban."Small Wars & Insurgencies 22.4 (2011): 574-602.

Sindre, Gyda Maras. "Internal party democracy in former rebel parties." Party Politics 22.4 (2016): 501-511.

Tarzi, Shah M. "Politics of the afghan resistance movement: cleavages, disunity, and fragmentation."Asian Survey 31.6 (1991): 479-495.

Weinstein, Jeremy M. "Resources and the information problem in rebel recruitment." Journal of Conflict Resolution 49.4 (2005): 598-624.

Welsh, Jennifer. "Civilian protection in Libya: putting coercion and controversy back into RtoP." Ethics & International Affairs 25.3 (2011): 255-262.

Wood, Reed M., and Jakana L. Thomas. "Women on the frontline: Rebel group ideology and women's participation in violent rebellion." Journal of Peace Research 54.1 (2017): 31-46.