Qualitative Research: Unlocking the Secrets of Outstanding Outcomes

Conducting research is the most exciting approach that allows one to evaluate different variables before asserting the best conclusion. In most cases, the use of a qualitative research approach is regarded as the most valid method in research processes due to its ability to produce numerous corresponding variables that can be used to formulate an outstanding outcome. However, another research process also allows researchers to deduce the most fundamental study process though there might be different outcomes from them. In most cases, different research approaches share significant similarities as well as differences that allow researchers to make the most outstanding result. Similarly, different qualitative research processes also exhibit such similarities and variations based on the variables or the methods adopted to ensure the process is concrete and stable. For instance, in the matrix, the inclusion of research approaches such as qualitative case study, phenomenology, and heuristic inquiry as well as general qualitative inquiry. These methods significantly portray similar outcomes and result mainly through the adopted procedures that have been put in [place to make the research successful. Notably, it is worth noting that the approaches used in the qualitative research method started the entire procedure by explaining the meaning of the intended process as well as the valuable correspondences. The focus of the general question in the outline approaches depended on the practical knowledge which is available to make the entire process concrete.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Similarly, most of the approaches used in the qualitative method share similar unique terminologies that are used in giving the research a meaningful evaluation and analytic outlook. For instance, in a qualitative case study, the most common terms that were used in explaining the required aspects that the study intends to capture. In the above research approaches, the study focuses entirely on the thematic rationales of the topics that are being discussed. According to Elo et al. (201), the research study reverts the choice of the question to be addressed in the content of the topic to be captured as well as the applications that needed to make the study more combative. Notably, the variation in the issues to be covered by the topics shows that regardless of the approach exhibited by research, the outcome is always synonymous with what he or she intends to discuss. However, in outlining the best backup resources for the research process, the adopted methods in the research mainly focus on ensuring that standard outcomes are realized.

However, although the qualitative research approaches in the study exhibited significant and similar outcomes, they differed on the main variables that are being a target for the entire examination. According to Modified from Patton, M.Q. (2014), most qualitative research de4soigns not only depend on the independent variable but also exploits other dependent variables in giving out meaningful results. For instance, as interactive and participatory qualitative applications depend on actions on research and learning organization as well as appreciative inquiry in capturing the needed basics of the research, ethnography and autoethnography mainly depend on dependent variables as the main basics that can be used for ensuring the success of the overall research process.

Additionally, in developing the qualitative research matrix, it is worth noting that each research approach has its main variables that not only determine the overall outcome but also ensure that it remains consistent with the issues being addressed. According to Saldana (2016), each approach in the matrix has its main points of concern that it depends on outlining the required variables for the research process. However, the basic qualitative inquiry approach remains to be the most excellent method that a researcher may choose from in building his or her research process. In terms of the disciplinary roots, the approach almost captures all study disciplines and ensures that they are dependent on each other results (Hoey, 2014). The focus of the question to be caught in this study approach also reiterates intrinsic characteristics and knowledge that can be expanded to make research more coherent and adoptive. Overall, the essential qualitative inquiry explores content words that can easily be validated if the study is supposed to be based on a common goal. According to Worthington Jr (2013), most qualitative research approaches depend on unique terminologies that make the entire process easy to understand to practical. But the latter gives research more coherent meaning with essential knowledge that can be used in building other integral rationales.

To sum, the rationale of every research is to ensure that it is capable of revealing the way the research process is structured. In the essential qualitative inquiry, the explanation is the objective and objectives with which the research tends to address. In the qualitative research processes, the reasons offered by researchers for more research process is the specific subject that it aims at addressing. Therefore, in selecting the latter, it will allow my research process to be descriptive and captures all aspects of the study that needs to be addressed. Overall, the qualitative research matrix and approaches outline basic repertoires that not only make the intended result successful but also allow the researcher to fathom other ideas is analyzing the outcomes.

References

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: an overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 273-290.

Hoey, B. (2014). U.S. Patent Application No. 13/916,513.

Modified from Patton, M.Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Saldana, J. (2016). Ethnotheatre: Research from page to stage. Routledge.

Worthington Jr, E. L. (2013). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. Routledge.