Paper Example on Conscientiousness

Introduction

Conscientiousness is a condition of contracts that describe the difference of a person base on the propensity of responsibilities to others, self-control, rule-abiding, and hard work. Conscientiousness is important to health especially when it appears indisputable because of it can predict significant risky and preventive behaviors for both real morality and health. It also predicts the physical health of an individual (Wanberg, 2012). One disease that is done using the conscientiousness spectrum is Alzheimer disease. While this method looks at the longevity of an individual it also looks at the magnitude that has similar acceptance to the health determinants like education and socioeconomic status.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Methods of Estimating the Reliability of the Assessment

Based on these findings alone, it is vital to focus on the attention of the research on conscientiousness and the effects it has on health. Conscientiousness plays fundamental roles when it comes to the domains and positive aging of life because this spectrum predicts the marital stability and controversy of the experiences such as divorce (Wanberg, 2012). Conscientiousness is also an independent predictor that of depression and personality traits likes neuroticism. This is because it is usually interested in promoting the possibilities of health, successful, long and happy life that is needed by most (Wanberg, 2012). Despite not much is known about conscientiousness there is a lot of work that needs to be done. For many years, testing and investigations were conducted to discover the traits of taxonomies based on the structure of conscientiousness that is under the characteristics of the domain identified.

Moreover, the understanding of the bond between the important outcomes and conscientiousness such success in work and love, longevity and health is only as sophisticated as the way people understand the construct of conscientiousness. For instance, a self-report done to ten individuals was discovered that several challenges were encountered during the application. The same problems also arise when the importance of the related questions are considered such as the developmental and genetic etiology of faithfulness (Wanberg, 2012). As such the methods that are supposed to be used to asses the constructs related to conscientiousness are problems described to a certain level of multidimensionality and analysis. It mostly concerns the self-observer and reports approaches while focusing on a trait like broad, experimental and dimensions when it came to the criteria of behavioral assess on the aspects of conscientiousness (Wanberg, 2012). Given that there was an inconsistency when it came to the correlations of the methods of the important research especially while focusing on the bridge gap developed during the approaches. The techniques will also assist in future research when identifying the character measures under the understanding of the conscientiousness domain than using the tractable method.

Like any other personality traits, conscientiousness has a hierarchically structured method that reordered from broad characteristics to narrow. This is because the trait-eliciting contexts are multifaceted since they aggregate along the components of the conscientiousness spectrum parts. When the conscientiousness facets are examined and closed, the aspect of the contextual elements on the domain that broad eventually becomes apparent. In other words, the conscientiousness self-reports vary based on their level of analysis and the task that the researcher has undertaken (Wanberg, 2012). Mostly the best method that should be used is the self-report ratings of the global personality trait.

Recommended Estimating Reliability

According to Kaplan (2018) when conducting such, three challenging assumptions are usually made. For instance, there is an assumption that the ratings of the personality traits estimate the specific behavior of a person. In other words, the personality inventory has a way of measuring the mix of things that tap the feelings thought and action. In actuality, the method also evaluates the internal consistency of the internal characters (Kaplan, 2018). Presumably, the reliability of the test-retest of the scales is usually a by-product of the interior, general and global attributions of the myths generated through the self-personality assessment methods to check the validity of the outcome (Kaplan, 2018). For instance, the average abilities of the singles variable sin psychology predict only outcomes that correlate with metrics of the personality traits.

Types of Vadility Moreover, since the research was only approximated, it could be wrong when it was predicted that the outcomes were based on the economic factors. Therefore the self-report personality test has always been used to predict wealth, relationship functionality, divorce, criminality, wealth and numerous indicators of psychopathology and the well being of a person (Kaplan, 2018). The measures, therefore, users do not validate the conscientiousness indicators with the neurological intellectual problem of disability when the challenges relate to conscientiousness (Kaplan, 2018). The use of the self-reports, however, has the consistency and high levels of the interjudge agreement. Moreover, the reports observers also demonstrate the equality of the predictive ability levels of the self-reports.

Conclusion

Conscientiousness, as elaborated in the essay, is a condition of contracts that describe the difference of a person base on the propensity of responsibilities to others, self-control, rule-abiding, and hard work. A wide range of methods can be used, but the best way is by using the self-reports easements because of the future research when identifying the character measures. However, since the investigation was only approximated, it could be wrong when it was predicted that the outcomes were based on the economic factors. The use of the self-reports, in this case, has the consistency and high levels of the interjudge agreement.

References

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2018). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, & issues (9th ed.). Boston MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Wanberg, C. R. (2012). Conscientiousness Scale. PsycTESTS Dataset, 232-332. doi:10.1037/t09325-000