Introduction
The paper starts by focusing on brief definitions regarding brainstorming techniques, the Delphi technique, and nominal group technique. It goes ahead to give a detailed discussion concerning how the methods mentioned above are applicable in day to day situations. Also, the paper concludes by providing a summary of the critical purposes of each technique.
Brainstorming Technique
Brainstorming refers to a group of creative technique which is necessary for finding a rational conclusion about a specific problem by collecting ideas given by different members spontaneously. In other words, brainstorming is an aspect where people meet to generate solution and ideas within a particular domain by eradicating inhibitions (Hagen, Bernard & Grube, 2016).
There are two types of brainstorming. They include the individual and group brainstorming. Individual brainstorming is considered to be more effective especially when one needs to solve a simple problem or even when focusing on a broad matter. On the other hand, group brainstorming is usually effective when handling complex issues.
Brainstorm entails a handful of individuals who perform a lot of talking while others intervene when asked to share some ideas. It can be made more interesting by engaging and holding successful meetings in an exciting place. For instance, any change concerning location encourages visual thinking, as well as playing new roles.
Brainstorm technique combines both the relaxed and formal approach when solving a problem with the help of lateral thinking. It motivates individuals to come up with better thoughts that at first can seem to be crazy. Some of the ideas generated can be crafted into original ones while others can spark more thoughts when providing a creative remedy to an issue. Also, brainstorm offers an open and free environment which allows and motivates every member in a group to participate effectively. In other words, during problem-solving, brainstorming merges diverse experiences from team members into play.
More so, it enhances the quality of the explored ideas which implies that one can often issue a better solution to any problem. To maintain the momentum of the brainstorming technique, one has to encourage every member of the group to continue storming either by their own or in small groups.
The Delphi Technique
The Delphi technique refers to an approach of bringing together the opinion of experts through the use of a series of questionnaires with the aim of attaining the consensus of the group. It entails four features that differentiate it from other processes of making group decisions. They include the controlled response iteration, feedback from a demographic group, the input of expert and the anonymity.
The Delphi technique applies a well-designated number of questions that are developed in several rounds. At times, the commonly used approach used is interviewing. In the process, the expert on the subject responds to questionnaires anonymously after which they are confronted with the views and knowledge of another expert. The approach assumes that the experts do not know each other and they are not aware who else could be in the panel of expert (Green, 2014).
More so, the Delphi Technique entails a feedback mechanism. The first attempt in the processing of the information involves the recording of the data obtained in the course of an interview. The feedbacks are the real future expectations as well as the considerations which underpin the expectations. The Delphi technique is useful as a research methodology especially when there is no exact answer such as in decision making.
Nominal Group Technique
Nominal group technique refers to a group process that includes identification of a problem, generation of a solution and the decision making. It is used by individuals who are in need of making a quick decision. In the approach, the method of tallying is usually the difference. Every group member provides their opinions concerning the solution which is generally a brief explanation. After that, whatever follows is the elimination of duplicate answers from the other list of solutions (McMillan, King & Tully, 2016). The members proceed to rank solution as either the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. After the ranks are made, sharing and discussions of the highlighted reasons start immediately where eventually choices are made by every member of the group.
Conclusion
In conclusion, brainstorming works typically through some ideas with the aim of finding a solution to a problem. It is a way of maximizing, sharing and generating new thoughts. Brainstorming provides several advantages when it comes to the process of sorting out issues. On the other hand, The Delphi Technique aims at attaining the consensus of the group through merging the opinion of experts with the help of a series of questionnaires. Nominal Group Technique allows for the identification of a problem, generation of a solution and the decision making.
References
Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014529773.
Hagen, M., Bernard, A., & Grube, E. (2016). Do It All Wrong! Using Reverse-Brainstorming to Generate Ideas, Improve Discussions, and Move Students to Action. Management Teaching Review, 1(2), 85-90.
McMillan, S. S., King, M., & Tully, M. P. (2016). How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 38(3), 655-662.
Cite this page
Paper Example on Brainstorming Technique. (2022, Jul 21). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/paper-example-on-brainstorming-technique
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Project Portfolio Office, Project Management Office and Program Management Office
- Tools of Organizational Change and Changes at the Top Essay
- Paper Example on Gender and Leadership in Healthcare Administration
- The Hotel Simulation Tool Paper Example
- Eliminating Gender Bias in the Workplace Paper Example
- History of Intel Corporation Paper Example
- Essay on Establishing Effective Healthcare Organisation: Risk Control Through Auditing