On Emotions and Judgment - Essay Sample

Introduction

This paper brings an argument about emotional intelligence is one of the most recent and prominent meanings of itself. The paper explains that emotions are made up of judgments and the said judgments are precisely a surprise so that people are able to make their own distinctions of what caused a certain emotion (Solomon, 2015 pp183-191). Solomon adds that these emotions become judgments become stronger when they are experienced by many people mostly from a family. As a matter of facts, an understanding of emotions could mean that people understand the judgments that make structures in them and thus there will be differences are well grained and so exquisite. Bob Zajonc in his writings explained emotions as being unconscious in people's lives. Bob looks at emotions as being unconscious mostly in debate contexts especially on the grounds of cognition and affection. His statements are objective towards Solomon's idea of emotions and judgments. In a very interesting way, Bob believed that the causes of emotions are unconsciousness and the state of emotion itself is the consciousness itself (Winkielman, 2016 pp353-362). However, in his works that he wrote later, Bob reconsidered his assumptions and found that his subjects are affecting primary experiments because they do not affect conscious affections, but instead the emotions act on basically preferred actions.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The hypothesis of affect-as-information concludes that emotions influence towards judgment is dependent on the emotion that is being experienced as the first reaction to judgmental objects. Many interesting tests for emotions have been mocked mostly whereby their jurors' became varied since their feelings became true (Solomon, 2015 pp183-191). The people who tested these feelings were accountancy students as they made decisions concerning the capability of a finance firm in a case where it is bankrupt. Various differing transcription versions were put in place with differing details about the consequences that distressed due to bankruptcy. The much the accounting juror students became distressed about the harm caused by bankruptcy, the more they judged the accounting firm to be liable for the bankruptcy. However, in the group of the jurors, some students were asked about how anxious they were being jurors before the beginning of the trial. The jurors were more importantly likely to go up to the verdicts that went against the organization since the stress that they experienced seemed to be all about rendering a decision rather than being about the impacts caused by the bankruptcy. In addition, we find out whether or not that emotions influence judgment, it is all dependants on major implications that are attributed by what caused the emotions. Without a clear cause, emotions tend to be promiscuous as they get together with what surrounds them and that is the reason why moods are influential to nonrelevant judgments.

Solomon finds out that emotions are specifically affectionate. The theory of affection-as-information is applied where emotions are together with a person's moods. He argues that different effects tell differing information touching on the ways of either positive or negative events. An online study has demonstrated the above-noted emotions which were observed after a terror attack in the year 2011. The study had 1000 Americans as respondents (Solomon, 2015 pp183-191). The people who participated in the study were made to mainly focus on either being angered of fearfully induced to aspects of the event. The angry respondents who were unfearful favored the policies of retaliation in subsequent order (Winkielman, 2016 pp353-362). The other group of fearful and not angry respondents shown high estimates for complete unrelated attacks and the risk of the attack itself.

Stoic argued on much elaborated general thesis about emotional nature after his forerunner by the name of Chrysalis. On his analysis, he supported that emotions are also judgments, different ways of understanding and how people perceive the world that they live in. Stoic's writings, he went against Aristotle adding that these emotions were purely irrational, mistaken and also very much misinformed. Some of the emotions according to Seneca could also be distorted by the desires of people perceiving them with a philosophical reason that is applied to them being true. Generally, the difference between reasoning and passion, judgment and emotion, is internally understood within the concept of judgment. The stoic analysis was supported by another Dutch philosopher by the name of Spinoza who used Stoic's thesis adding that emotions are primarily thoughts that are pushed by desire although they are necessarily not reasonable.

Twenty years ago, many virtuals of the triumph of the cognitive hypothesis have had a good number of defenders if not by a way of any agreement or argument. Many advocates of the cognitive theory have been attracted to the idea of emotions being necessarily dependant on judgments if they are wholly made up of cognition. Many have agreed that the nature of cognition is new to beliefs, emotions as well as thoughts whether they consist of emotions or other factors in particular. Solomon in his paper insisted that emotions are made up of judgments in many places that he argued. He said that against his cognitive thesis and many others like his, there are other arising objections although it is not well spelled with many details. The objection part confirmed that emotion assessment is a superfluity of mental and also human senses components that made some philosophers to term emotions as judgments, evaluations, and appraisals (Winkielman, 2016 pp353-362). Accordingly, the identification by the philosophers could not work. It is clear that a person could precisely hold those desires and believes in a less emotional and dispassionate way. For a person to get emotionally tired there is more involvement of something desirable and they should believe in it.

On the other hand, Bob objected that emotions bring about judgment by stating that emotions are unconscious feelings. In his arguments, Bob was more curious about the possibility of emotions going beyond cognition. His idea was intrigued by some information that suggested that high standards for taboo words had a relation to some hot responses as stated by McGinnies (1949). Bob tested the emotions question in an empirical manner while using a tachistoscope a machine that is used for measuring responses of the electrodermal. The test resulted out that defense against emotional judgment is not much perceptual. However, Bob added that the levels of recognition were found to be more functional of what the subject found but what he thought by himself. While concluding his article, Bob claimed that the awaited defense phenomenon is not wholly proven.

He further added that the phenomenon is typically demonstrable since it has to be proven by well-established methods other than the most commonly used. To summarize the defection of the earlier argument, Bob said that the question of unconsciousness in emotions is not complete but it still required other better methods as well as better theoretical developments. Later on, Bob went for a break from emotions being unconscious and went back to the topics of exploring his dissertation on mental representations of person's. As he worked on his dissertation, Bob helped in creating a new field that is now referred to as social cognition. In addition to drafting some classic hypothetical integrations of the subject, Bob viewed such fundamental problems as a way of tuning cognitive representations in the period of interactions. Bob in his studies added that the cognitive representations are dependent on structural factors which are a balance. Surprisingly, as much as Bob objected to cognitive-emotional beliefs, he was a prominent cognitive scientist.

In the mid-1970s, there came an opportunity of confronting the question of unconscious emotion with a more clear way and hypothesis. Bob's work was used since it his thesis that stated the primacy and independence from cognition. Methodologies for minimal presentations are more usable and well verified and Bob anxiously took advantage over the same. In the hypothesis, the new look of the word too new respect. Later, cognitive psychology was taken as investigated relations in both controlled as well as automatic processes. Bob came up with a piece of evidence for emotional primacy as well as some truth from emotional primacy that affected cognition. Additionally, he by means of force decried the neglecting of the disparaged status of the emotions that were displayed in psychological experiments. Bob added that by considering emotion to be consequential or a secondary process which was kept on cognitive models, the field will have missed its main point of what emotion meant (Winkielman, 2016 pp353-362). The modern hypothesis on cognition left from the times of our grandfathers as stated by Bob who believed that ideas should be clearly appreciated as acts of pure cognition as always followed by better feelings. On its worst, the type of academic psychology made contradictions of the true human experiences. Bob quoted Cummings stating that feeling is the first who gives some attention to a variety of happenings by kissing you. To add it up, feeling and thinking are defined as a statement of passion that is intended to make tides turn as it eventually assumed.

Solomon particularly made his argument clear that the analyses of various emotions being judgments are not clear ways of which can be understood by simple-minded persons. He says in his paper that the simple minds claim cognitive emotions states that each emotion is the assertion of a particular judgmental action or else a belief. Such kind of a perception by the simple minded people is mainly shown as if it is not enough of an argument. Solomon further argued that the emotions that are considered as judgments have to be particular acts of judgments, not only the confirmation of some few propositions (Solomon, 2015 pp183-191). Secondly, the judgments that makeup emotion should be considered as judgmental systems and not just mere single judgments. Solomon again added that for judgments to be constituted with emotions, it should essentially and not as it is always put together to certain expressions that are observed in more pathological occurrences. His arguments further noted that the perceptions of various people are not to be tied to people's desires of doing various things but rather, they should start in a more structural way than more disruptive manner.

Conclusion

In conclusion, emotions are pervasively influential on the thoughts of a man and the judgments that they make in their daily lives. In the paper, there is summarized evidence to various theories of psychological processes that are involved. In the cases of judgments, there is the importance of assigning objections of judgment in the case of making differences in a person's own cognitions as well as implications. The various experiments have a consistency of showing how positive emotions uplifts and how negative emotions explores the responses of the cognitive hypothesis that have dominated particular situations.

References

Solomon, R.C., 2015. On emotions as judgments. American Philosophical Quarterly, 25(2), pp.183-191.

Winkielman, P., 2016. Bob Zajonc and the unconscious emotion. Emotion Review, 2(4), pp.353-362.