Nothing Would Change in a World Without Racism - Essay Sample

Introduction

Naturally, the human brain is wired to make a judgment on a person, and within 5 seconds, you can decide whether to like them or not. Racism is merely fuel for the drive to dislike a person or the other way around, and the brain will ostensibly dislike the way a person wears his shoes. In the light of this assertion, perhaps racism does not exist the way people have always thought of it. In fact, racism is not the way it has ever occurred. Flashback to the inception of sugarcane farming in the Caribbean, the then colonial laws never made any distinction between white and black laborers. However, much change came by with the inclusion of racial laws proving that racism is just a social construction. What happens is that people hold different abstractions at different times. This hints that racism exists relative to world realities specifically for ideological, security, and economic purposes. Logically, in and of themselves, these two are not race related. Henceforth, taking race out of the equation nothing would change since people will still hold deep divisions.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

It is worthwhile to accept that the outcomes of racial distinctions are dark, horrible, and unfortunate. Without a doubt, there is no exemption to this; the Holocaust, slavery, colonialism, extinction of aboriginals and other atrocities. However, based on these events, it still not worthy to claim that these problems were the outcome of racism. The other way to look at these issues that are linked to racism is to ask yourself this question. If all people were of the same culture, hold same beliefs, and are of the same color, would this make these problems vanish? Of course not. Even in the absence of racism, people will not agree. There will always be some people who target others for several purposes. Racism accomplishes this purpose, and it is there for the same reasons. To gain dominance over others and build coherence, and the feeling of togetherness from another group there will always be the other whom is looked down upon. If the one who is looked down upon is not racism motivated, there will still be something else to do so.

It would be of little disbelief to know that the primary drive for racism is political reasons. Manifestations of racism are to display society's hierarchy and a way to dominate the group and maintain the economic and social power. Referring to racism in any form is ostensibly to miss the point. The ideology is that people keep speaking about racism as conflicting to bias or discrimination encompasses an unfair negation of the other members of society. You may exclaim racist acts or conduct, but you are supposed to desist from calling someone a chauvinistic. The assertion is that the latter take in denunciations of ethical charm, which purportedly make someone outside the insipid of enlightened society. Assume that one day you wake up with your eyes gouged out and you cannot hate or like someone based on the size and shape of their nose. Or rather, it happens that suddenly, all people be of the same color. Without a doubt, politics would still be played in the society. There will be someone who will always want to rule. From these politics shall arise aa way of discriminating and still one man will look down upon the other. Politics will always be there and even if racism was not their politics will mean that no change shall occur.

There is a common belief that perhaps one of the best ways to end racism is to encourage interracial marriages. By supporting this, maybe all the races would mix, and the world could end up with a single race. Practically, this is what has happened on the island of Hawaii. From the time when Captain Cook and his sailors discovered Maui, interracial marriages have followed leading to this place being termed as a melting pot of the races. Olson asserts that from the genes of Captain Cook's sailors and that of the native Polynesians, Hawaii equally has the DNA of Mexican cowhands, missionaries, African American soldiers as well as plantation workers from Asia (301). Today almost every person living in Hawaii has a mixed DNA. Judging from the extent of the extent at which intermarriage has wiped out ethical identity, there is the belief of acceptance of everyone and a lack of discrimination. However, there are still deep divisions that people hold in this place. The place has a few incidents of discrimination, especially in the workplace. This happens when the Hawaiian laws have explicit provisions on discrimination. This is evidence that even with the absence of race, nothing would change in regards to discrimination.

Without a doubt, there would still be conflict even if all people were of the same race. Olson also states that some of the harshest disputes that are experienced today are between people are physically indistinguishable (302). For instance, the people of Pakistan and India are similar and even have a similar accent. It is right to believe that these people are of the same race. Is this similarity, there is a deep rivalry between people from these two countries. Another example is the ever-existing conflict between the Shia and Sunni Islamists. These are Arabs who share same beliefs, yet they have been at war for centuries just because of ideological differences. Perhaps a more relatable example could be the Yugoslavian war. According to Olson, the Croats believed that their Serbian opponents were tall and blonde while themselves were disparaged to have darker skin and hair (303). It is similar to physical attributes that were used to distinguish between the Hutu and the Tutsis during the Rwanda genocide in Africa. The assertion here is that if people of the same race can find to discriminate each other based on biological traits, even if everyone were of a single race, there will always be something that makes you look different from each other. People will still discriminate even if everyone was white, Asian, or black.

Conclusion

In summary, nothing would change in the world even if there were no racial distinctions. What happens is that manifestation of racisms is for ideological, security and economic reasons. Even if the entire world population could be of a single race, people could still find distinctions that they could use to discriminate others. Hawaiians are racially diverse following years of interracial marriages, yet in such a scenario there is still racial discriminations. Existing conflicts between people of the same race has proved that race does not cause world problems. In the end, people will still conflict even in the absence of racial distinctions.

Works Cited

Olson, Steve. "Mapping human history." Genes, Race and Our Common (2002).