Literary Analysis Essay on "Design" by Robert Frost

Introduction

Robert Frost is one of the sneaky fellas who make poems out of void to create a comprehensive piece that dwindles around mild interpretive scores. In the "Design" he portrays a simple little poem with complex lines that requires proper attention for interpretation processes. The poem has a nice singsong-y rhyme and meters its unique diction and sounds like a Mother Goose, very coarse and dark in form, thereby making its features hard to interpret.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Similarly, the nature of "Design" is a major surprise, though the poet tries to calm the irrational form with new apertures. For example, Frost remained determined and sticks out different parts of the poem with classical meters and rhyme schemes making it at least are acceptable among junior readers with little imageries to calm the complexities that might be evident (Frost 1). Generally, the poem is about a little flower with mild secretes which requires keen analysis to fathom the actual meaning and make the piece truthful within the context of literary aesthetics and purpose. This review aims at identifying and discussing the interpretive problems that are presented in the "Design" poem by Frost.

The poem has a small setting, making the speakers to occasionally look back on a little memory which easily is forgotten unless the bizarre is kept glowing. The actions of the poem surround a tiny flower which exposes readers to focus on minimal features to bring out an extensive analysis of the poem. Similarly, although the poem leaves a bizarre type of natural scene, it is hard to bring the different parts of interpretations together. This makes the speaker wonder back and forth but still fails to provide compressive and comforting answers. Additionally, Frost being a sneaky dude starts the poem so irrationally and low tempo making the poem to sound childish (Frost 3). The bouncing rhythm in the poetry which is accompanied by ten lines which are written in such a way that they alternate between unstressed syllables against the stressed syllables makes the poem to maintain its childish sound. The complexity of the poem is further portrayed in the second lime that brings more irony to the whole piece. The use of pretty-little flower in the poem by Frosts with confusing color reveals little complexities with the picture. The flower is shown to have a sickeningly white and fat spider which is holding a moth, that is about to be eaten alive. It's quite ironical because the first flower is associated with the healing factor and should not harm.

In lines Three and Four of the poem, Frost reveals that the moth in line two is also white although it is clear that the moth was already dead from the spider's venom. However, in this case, it is portrayed to be rigid and satin. This juxtaposition leaves the readers in a more contrastive view as well as a sense of dread that requires extensive exploration to maintain the sound pattern. Similarly, although lines 2 and 3 of the poem move us towards the moth and away from the spider, the rhyme scheme of the rhyming words, "moth" and "cloth" emphasizes the sound. However, this is jeopardized inline four which creates an end rhyme from the end word in line 1; "white" and "blight." As a result, line 4 sounds like a depressing family reunion with different words which tears it more apart.

Moreover, lines 5 and 6 of the poem reveal a more complex figure from Frost's poem. Though lines 3 and 4 tries to bring out the actual meaning of the poem, Frost brings another zig zag in line 5 and instead starts the line in a verb "mixed" to push a separate unit from the adjacent lines (Su 234). However, this brings another complex approach to the predetermined circumstances which are portrayed in the poem. Similarly, the images used in pieces fails to accomplish the actual meaning of their use making the metaphors chosen by Frost to sling our attention to the negative symbol. Additionally, in lines 7 and 8, a quick recap is made. Line 4 was dark, five light while line six was revealed as dark again (Frost 7). It could be assumed that the next line will follow the sequence, but the next followed a different tone. A similar image is revealed to provide a descriptive alliteration in words, "flower" and "forth" even though it is not sure about the overall meaning of the content words. Notably, line 8 also reveals darker ideas; the kite is portrayed to sound like it is less hopeful unless it is carried up high. Consequently, this admits that most poets have failed to identify the actual meaning and usage of metaphors. They scatter them aimlessly in the poem in an attempt to bring out the meaning of the words used.

Furthermore, the pretty light turns that makes up a sonnet poem is broken in the last lines of the poem. The reflection of different scenes in the poem makes the speaker lose the initial interpretation of the rhyme scheme. Mainly, lines 9 and ten an obvious question arises in an attempt to hit the sonnets ever-important part. For example, the speaker tries to identify the cause of white color in flower. Similarly, line 9 also maintains the rhyme scheme from the adjacent lines (Su 234). This was not to be the case because, at the beginning of the sestet line of a sonnet, a change in rhyme scheme is a must. Frost maintains this scheme to limit his rhyme sounds throughout the poem to keep its formality. However, in line 10, things are a little murky. The speaker merely reveals the flower in another color. This might be awkward because it explains that it was not sure who made the flower white. This contradicts the actual function of the poem and makes it lose its healing responsibility.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Ben Frost's poem, "Design," major interpretive problem is evident. The setting was too narrow with a simple one-word title that must be addressed amicably before the actual meaning of the poem is identified. Rhyming words, alliteration, bitter words, and symbols make the poem trying to analysis and come up with concrete sense. Overall in line 11to 12, Frost reveals an obsessive rhyming correlation to make several coincidences which are meaningless to the poem. He also uses obvious questions whose answers look very simple, but as one reads further, the answer gets more complicated. The new picture in line 12 makes the poem very hard to interpret as it had not been explained in the earlier lines. Most words in the poem are also hilarious at cannot fit in the poet's meter.

Works Cited

Frost, Robert. The collected poems of Robert Frost. Chartwell Books, 2016.

Su, Yujie. "Dark Energy in Robert Frost's Poems." Theory and Practice in Language Studies 6.7 (2016): 1372-1376.