Israel-Palestine Conflict: Territorial Disputes & Holocaust Tragedy - Essay Sample

Introduction

Israel and Palestine have been in conflict dating back from the end of the nineteenth century, with the significant issue of controversy being territorial conflicts (Global Conflict Tracker, 2020). Land and whoever rules it has been the heart of Israel/Palestine conflict with both the Jewish and Palestine laying claim to the same territory thus informing the long term conflict. Most border conflict has been deepened by the Holocaust tragedies, coupled with the dispossession and occupation of Palestine. The United Nations' attempt to partition the land in 1947 in the quest of simultaneously resolving the two claims failed to achieve a lasting settlement between the two nations (Jacobs, 2012). Are the Israelis and Palestinians still in conflict over the state borders? This paper is aimed at the discussion of the significant state border conflicts between Israelis and Palestinians, together with Israelis and Palestinians perspectives on the same. Since 2002, the government of Israel has been building a security fence that has crossed over to Palestine's border with Israelis claiming that the barrier is aimed at keeping the suicide bombers of Palestine from striking the Israelis. The territory has formed a first de facto annexation of the region of Palestine.as it controlled significant Palestinian economic, agricultural and natural resources besides violating international laws in the International Court of Justice. Israeli and Palestinians are therefore still in conflict, prevalently in the realms of state borders that have resulted in the unequal struggle over land that has never found a lasting settlement despite the intervention of the United Nations.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Reasons for the State Border Conflict Between Israelis and Palestinians

State border conflicts have brought in consensus on where to draw the line as most are in the idea that the border is to follow the route that existed before the 1967 Arab Israeli war (Fisher, 2016). The Israelis, on the other hand, believe that they should keep the land that it has established settlements and compensate Palestine with some of its territories. Israelis barriers are along and within the West Bank that may analysts have underscored that would create a de facto border, coupled with its settlements in the West Bank that would render it cumbersome in establishing that land as part of Independent Palestine. With the time, the arrangements continue to grow, thus making theoretically the future of the State of Palestine smaller as it continues to break into noncontiguous pieces.

Currently, the West Bank is under the control of Palestinian Authority, albeit occupied by the Israeli. That is following the Israeli troops who ensure the Israeli's security and restrict the movement and activities of Palestine's in such Israelis settlers. Jewish Israelis have built and settled and expanded their communities in West Bank, retracting Palestinians from the land. Hamas who is under the Islamic fundamentalist party in the Israeli blockade is the one responsible for controlling the Gaza in the West bank here the Israelis have settled, thus fueling the conflict between the two nations(Fisher, 2016).

Israeli-Palestinian State Border Conflict

State border conflict has been the core issue of Israeli-Palestinian conflict that led to the Declaration of Principles (DoP) formed under the Oslo Agreement that was to discuss among other issues boride conflicts (Kumaraswamy, 2019). The conflicts on borders are evident with the Israelis who have avoided defining territorial limits fueled by the refusal of the Zionism in defining territorial limits and the silence of the Declaration of Independence on the same issue, thus leading to the fears and uncertainties on the impending hostilities. That has informed the primary Israeli- Palestinian conflict, especially in defining the extent of Zionism territorial limits as Israelis are left to define the critical roles on what it entails and what it does not. The future and resolution of Israeli -Palestinian conflict in the realms of the border would only be determined by the coercion of Israeli to define it, boarder. The Citizens of Israelis living outside the perimeter of West Bank would be forced to live as Palestinian state citizens or return to Israel. That would further result in evacuation and dismantling of Israelis' settlements in the Palestinian border as the fate of the settlers would remain undecided (Kumaraswamy, 2019). Moving Israelis away from the historical legacy of vagueness in the sphere of respect to boarders may not be easy; hence the two nations would still be in conflict over the same despite the interventions of the International community.

Israeli-Palestinian Perspective on their State Border Conflicts

The two-nation perspectives on a two-state approach in the quest to find a solution to the problem whereby Palestine would opt for a declaration as an independent state of Gaza and the West Bank as the rest of the land area to be left to the Israelis. Both countries would disagree on the ideal solution, but with time they would concur that it is the whole perspective involving the border conflict. My view, on the other hand, would underlie a one-state solution whereby I would prefer that the entire land becomes one big Israel or one big Palestine. That solution, despite its shortcomings, I think it would be essential for demographic and political reasons.

Conclusion

Israel has been in control of Palestine following the expansion of its territory to occupy a significant part of Palestine by the construction of settlements for its citizens and enforcing tight security to prevent Palestrina from holding such places. That has, for a long time, formed the basis for the state border conflicts between the two states despite the intervention of the United Nations and the International Community since it creates a de facto border, especially in the Palestinian West Bank. The main approaches of resolving the conflict would be a two sate approach with the declaration of Palestine, an independent state of Gaza, and West Bank as the Israelis occupy the rest of the land. An alternative would be a one-state plan whereby the whole property becomes one big Palestine or one big Israel.

References

Fisher, M. (2016).The -Two-State Solution: What it is and why it hasn't happened. The NewYork Times. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/29/world/middleeast/israel-palestinians-two-statesolution.html

Global Conflict Tracker. (2020, April).Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cfr.org/interactive/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/israeli-palestinian-

Jacobs, F. (2012, August).The Elephant in the Map Room. The New York Times. Retrieved fromhttps://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/07/the-elephant-in-the-map-room/

Kumaraswamy, P. (2019, March).The border is the Core of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. IDSAIssue Briefs. Retrieved from https://idsa.in/issuebrief/border-is-the-core-of-the-IsraeliPalestinian-conflict-prkumaraswamy-05032019