Free Essay Example on Moral Theory Versus Utilitarian Theory

Introduction

Human being's behaviors and moral virtues have numerous theories that are universal elaborative on human nature. The rationality of humanity and the swing of moods do not need to affect the normal. The society has credible needs of necessitating considerable human nature of behaving. Society needs to have morals that are being followed up to by a human. Scholar and moral value studies have Kantian and utilitarian for theory experiment. At the center of scrutiny of character and the core idea of autonomy by Kant’s moral theoretic view are of interest to most readers.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The majority of the readers understand Kant as the paramount holder of the autonomy property of the wills in rational and agents of behavior. Interpreting the autonomy was the Kant’s view on the fundamental understanding and justifying the authority that moral requirements ideally have over us. There have been hypothesized scenarios of Kantian moral theory that have proved to be working in consideration of compelling, relevant scenarios. However, in comparison with the Utilitarian theory is not as effective as Kant’s view. There have been several considerations slagging information on the virtues and moral level in utilitarianism.

Kantian Moral Theory Reliability

A Kantian moral theory is speculated, and its scrutiny has aims and the philosophical method of moral achievements. The primary aim of Kant’s system needs to have the priori principals that need to be achieved morally. Kant’s has imperatives on the assessment of the moral philosophy action skills (Lauinger, 1958). The consistency action of the universal laws of the significant needs for maxim characters. The respect of human dignity as humanity's paramount needs ends on the means of always meaning the ends. The universal acceptability act on the maxim regarding the same universally lawgiving.

The ethical definition of the conscious reflection on human beliefs improves the extending or refining belief for some more ways. Kant's moral theory and utilitarianism are the two theories that attempt on the festival nature of human beings. The Kant’s, through the formula on the acting, has much favor for humanity and the mere opposed means. The mere means involvement in the scheme on the action, which could be the consistent principle.

According to Kant, there should be an interpretation of particular action. He believed that human life is of value and bares the rational life consideration. Human is rational beings and is automatically rational of behavior (Udoudom et al., 30). While utilitarianism believes that actions that produce greatness amount to happiness, and the problem is within us, and the involvement of people means sacrificing on the lives for the greater good.

Kant’s festival consideration is paramount on the moral improvement effects. The impartial, consistent, and rationality is the crucial emphasis and respect for the person in ways we live in our lives. Kant is correct in the absolute moral and cannot be violated, self-servicing exceptions, prevents any loopholes, and the basis of personal determination for our duties. The intrinsic worth of human beings is the virtue of human beings by having the rights, intrinsic moral worth, dignity, and hat every human being is like a unique artistic creation.

The moral framework for the rights of the cultural interest of the fond rights and Kant’s theory help where we get them. The duties imply the rights on the legitimate expectation of the implacable rights. Kant does not discriminate human beings and, in the same consideration of the same human rights, other things being equal.

There are some utterly sure about the consequences of the actions there has been helpful Kant’s view avoid consequences in making ethical decisions, so it does not have the problem. The autonomy and the critical ability to choose in moral projects (Willemsen, 35). The duty pursues happiness of the reason along with not breaking promises and committing suicide, and that is determined by the categorical formulation imperative.

The non-relativistic right and duties and the transcend in the societies and the context of Kant’s view and does not have the problem the individual cultural relativism. The human should have the same rights inequality and be equal. The moral framework rights have the culture of the united states, and in a civilized society, the duties imply legitimate moral expectation.

Disadvantage of Utilitarianism

Mill’s ethical view has several theories that are not acceptable and biased. The negative responsibility and according to utilitarianism, have a moral responsibility that is needed for human living together. There are many disadvantages in the consideration so the human. Lack of autonomy and the integrity of moral agents (Willemsen, 2019). The people have not bee wrong in the pleasurable consideration of what would lead to considering the number of mistakes bne0ing done. Terrorist group example is a week example in consideration of social issues. The children and the ruthless terrorist who have nuclear weapons; hence it is not eligible to give such an example in the consideration.

Conflict of the rule and the rule of utilitarianism has the issue of the immorality being explored. The consideration because of the utilities says that there is no picking of rules and theories. The utility monsters for the proposed creatures for the assumption of the experience time of 100, and it is the consideration of biased and discrimination.

The prisoners' war in the act of utilitarianism is the weak and the unbiased things of the morally reprehensible according to the ethical theories. Utilitarianism requires the choice of prisoners in the least of useful and producing happiness. The theories of Kant, on the other hand, choose the soon in killing acts of any prisoners who have no reason for holding captive on prisoners. It is elaborately that in the comparison of the pros of Kant’s view, it is outdoing the moral issue of utilitarianism. It is a universal consideration and human being considerable behavior effectiveness.

Conclusion

It is clear from the consideration of the scrutiny of the moral issues and character in consideration of two theories. Utilitarianism and Kant’s theorem of moral issues. The utilitarian theory is more biased and gives examples of consideration theories of weak elaboration. However, moral and the universal necessity is help full in consideration of having the necessitation of the character and good moral of ventures. Kant’s ethical view favors the right morals.

The rational, impartial, and consistent human being have good health. The intrinsic worth of human beings and the nonrealistic rights and duties of the hypothetical coverage is necessary for the consideration of the human character. It is necessary to have sufficient means of the human character and necessitate good human characterization. It is reliable and of good morals to base on Kant’s ethical view. It is advisable, and in many organizations, the teaching of moral theories and disciple forces and institutions like schools implement the Kant’s consideration of the moral theories of the same.

Works Cited

Lauinger, W. (2016). The morality-welfare circularity problem. Philosophical Studies, 174(8), 1959-1981.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0777-1

Udoudom, M. D., Bassey, S. A., Okpe, O., & Adie, T. (2019). Kantian and utilitarian ethics on capital punishment. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 28-35.
https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i2.234

Willemsen, P. (2019). Moral responsibility. Omissions and their moral relevance.
https://doi.org/10.30965/9783957437952_003.