Definitions of the term race have failed to identify clearly and establish the position of race in the society in the 21st century. Even the disciplines such as Biology and Anthropology that deal with matters revolving around human race and culture disagree among themselves on whether race exists, or it is just a fallacy. The controversy on race in 21st-century society has gone beyond cultural and social boundaries, and it has become a matter of discussion in political and ethical arenas. The social and cultural perception and interpretation of race conflict with that of various disciplines interpretation. The race has been portrayed to exist over many centuries yet scientific facts have proven that race does not exist.
The race has been used in social and cultural contexts to divide humans based on skin color, language, and geographical location. The division of the human being based on these criteria is a delusion. With the fight against racism in various continents, it is expected that people will change their perception on this issue (Haviland, Prins and Mcbride 97). The categorization of people based on social and cultural contexts can well be identified as an ethnicity that does not offer a detailed justification of the existence of race.
Biological evidence disapproves the existence of race in the 21st century. In the field of biology, the term race has been used to refer to a population of a species that are genetically different from other population in the same species (Haviland, Prins and Mcbride 98). To justify these claims, the biologists go further into studying complex internal genetic features of human beings. For instance, the types of antibodies and blood group types classify all people in the world into different distinct groups. Such biological concepts disapprove the claims of the existence of race in the 21st century. A person could be sharing the same blood group with another person elsewhere in the world where both people have differences in language, skin color and hair configuration. In the instance of an urgent need of blood transfusion, these two individuals can share blood and lives can be saved. People can originate from the same geographical location, have the same skin color, speak the same language and have similar hair configuration yet a life can be lost because they may not share blood during an emergency.
The technological breakthrough further disapproves the fallacy of race in the 21st century. The advancement in technology has enabled the study of the most complex internal features of human beings thus identifying people to primarily originating from a single prototypic species (Curnoe, Human Races). It is the time that these technological facts released human being from the misconceptions of race that have buried them for quite a long time. The archeological evidence goes further into proving that people evolved once without a series of specifications and replacements. The study of an internal feature of humans has shown that the concept of human race is non-existence in the 21st century.
In the past centuries, humans have been divided into racial groups based on skin color, hair configuration, language and geographical locations. Biological evidence has cleared doubts of the existence of race based on these features as it divides all human being in the world into specific different antibodies and blood groups. The biological perspective has received support from the technological evidence that has further proved that all humans evolved once without a series of specifications and replacement.
BIBLIOGRAPHY \l 1033 Curnoe, Darren. Human races: biological reality or cultural delusion? 14 August 2014. 16 July 2015. <http://theconversation.com/profiles/darren-curnoe-2101>.
William Haviland, Harald Prins, Bunny McBride, Dana Walrath. Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Comparing the University System in USA and England
- Since virtue is mainly composed of choices, Aristotle considered it as an action that is learned by doing. Virtue does not automatically take place in the mind of a person the way sight does. Virtue is a state of character that has to be learned. Virtue is developed by constant action that exercises it over time. As Aristotle puts it, nature adapts humans to receive virtues that can only be perfected by habit (Rorty, 1970). The virtue of justness can be acquired by consistently taking just action. Temperance can be acquired by exercising restraint in many situations. Over time, these actions towards attaining virtue become habits. Subsequently, Aristotle further establishes the relationship between virtue and habit.
- Loss of Innocence: The Loons and Two Kinds
- Biographical Narrative of the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
- Admission Essay
- Dilemma III
- IT Project Manager: CV Example
- Coca-Cola Analysis
- Comparison of the Big Sleep Book to Movie
- Experiment Methodologies
- Rotary Club Essay for Scholarship
- Study of Physics and the Understanding of the Real World