Essay Sample on Upper, Lower and Middle Class Peasants Collaborate to Fight Societal Vices in Fascist Era

Introduction

In the era of fascism, the large landowners wished to protect their interests and thus wanted to appease the small scale farmers who were the majority and whose structure developed from the identity of the economic and familial existence. Therefore based on this reasoning, the family situation in the upper and lower middle class was equivalent to their economic position. Besides, the collaboration between these classes of peasants enabled them to fight societal vices. This collaboration has also enabled the inner circle of the nation's economy to earn its daily bread reducing the burden of the national government.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The middle-class family ideology was linked with their specialized attachment to the mode of agricultural production. Given that the ties between blood and soil are significantly strong, it was believed to be a prerequisite for a healthy family. In contemporary society, different social classes, both lower and middle levels, have been aligned in ways that promote unhealthy competition, which is further reflected in their families, such as when there occurs sibling rivalry in fighting for attention from the parents. Notably, the relationship between man and wife, as well as some aspects of sexual living, are among the fundamental elements that safeguard the existence of the natural organization of humanity, such as the economic and familial situations.

In addition, given the economic discrepancies that exist between the upper-middle and the lower-middle-class individuals, the element of sexual morality is one of the ideologies that seem to bridge the gap. The people in the lower middle class try to distinguish themselves from the manual laborer by observing sexual morality in their family life. The feeling that he is observing high aspects of sexual morality compensates for the economic benefits that he is deprived of not belonging to the upper-middle class.

Every family in the authoritian state has a representative, and in most cases, it is the father making him a critical asset of the state. Therefore his position in the country and his economic position are reflected by his relationship with the rest members of his family. Furthermore, his authoritian position reflects in his political role, which he maintains in the family, and he is expected to reproduce values such as submissiveness to the authority to his children and more so the male ones. Notably, this is the basis for the submissive attitude of the middle class towards the authority, which forms a reliable identification with any authority.

Conclusion

The contemporary society is therefore not formed by nature but by a reproduction of the authoritian social system in the structure of its members, which is founded on the family units. Thus the mass psychological, structural reproduction of the economic system is the basic formation of the political ideologies that are reflected by the middle-class society. Several factors enhance the continued existence of the authoritian family, which includes sexual inhibition, which is also the basis of the lower-middle-class citizens. These inhibitions are further advanced by religious fears, which bring about feelings of sexual guilt, which results in sexual weaknesses that undermine the levels of individual confidence levels significantly. In this state, whereby an individual is fighting immoral and indecent sexual behaviors to quest their sexual pleasure, all the elements of the reactionary human structure are formed.