Essay Sample on National Counterintelligence Strategic Plan

Introduction

The Counterintelligence Strategic Plan is a measure that is aimed at collecting information, conducting activities to identify, exploit, deceive, and disrupt actions against intelligent activities that are conducted on behalf of foreign administrations, people, their agents, or even global terrorist organizations. The 2018-2022 National Counterintelligence Strategic Plan communicates the various objectives for the Counterintelligence Community. These objectives are significant for the US government as they may use them to arrive at the specific objectives within the National Intelligence Strategy and the National Security Strategy in various ways.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

To reach the objectives, the US government efforts are supported by the Intelligence Community. Their cooperation lets the government successfully protect the land, defeat terrorists and other criminals, mitigate violent extremism, and hinder potential threats to security from attaining weapons of mass destruction (Chapper, 2011). The intelligence community may identify and evaluate the threat groups and warn the people then create measures with the US government to challenge their operations effectively.

Various US government partners may also cooperate with the Intelligence Community to enhance the capabilities required for the support of a range of actions out of the plan's objectives. These may include supporting prevention of the flow of technologies, funds, and expertise that may threaten national security, and finding opportunities that the US and its allies can discourage interests in the weapons of mass destruction. Additionally, the Intelligence community may improve the capabilities to seek the plans of terrorists, their intentions, and then deny them the impacts.

The US government may meet the specific objectives by accepting reinforcements from the Intelligence community. These may be particularly useful in the mitigation of the consequences of the weapons of mass destruction through the support of characterization of the capabilities of adversaries. Through the coalitions, the government may successfully develop the countermeasures against the use of weapons (Negroponte, 2007). The counterintelligence community may also offer to collaborate with the US government towards meeting the specific objectives. Their assistance may find the community at the lead with a comprehensive, and consistent effort that protects against the threats to national security.

The US government may support the new alignments and informal networks that exist beyond its scope. International power is more diffuse than before, and such considerations may see positive social, political, and economic impacts. As soon as the links outside of the national government are encouraged, collaborations amongst public, governmental, commercial, and other players can be influential either virtually or regionally. Through it, the US government may realize a projected increase in the international middle class and also record better political and economic changes. Additionally, various states and international institutions can operate independently and effectively, letting the government be the lead towards attaining the specific objectives.

Achieving the set objectives may let the government realize importance in technology as a catalyst for the rapid outcome of changes that could be difficult to anticipate. Through technological advances, there would be systemic and potential fragility since various foreign governments and non-state players may seek to leverage existent and upcoming technologies to utilize for their interests. Additionally, new channels can be created through the plans for information sharing across the government, as well as the state and local levels which can better create better transparency alongside collaborations amongst members. Through the channels, new strategies can be enhanced, which may ensure the intelligence sharing aims at reaching the specific objectives.

Through the plan, the US government may have access to the most-sophisticated intelligence information collection technologies across the world. The government may, therefore, utilize the information to recruit, train, motivate, educate and sustain a talented workforce that can assist it in meeting its specific objectives (Eggers, 2007). The government may also realize the full potential of the combined intelligence strengths and resources to find the gaps that need attention through such strengths. The information can also be transferred to some skilled workers who can work on behalf of the government to let it meet the specific objectives

Through the plan, the government may implement foreign intelligence from communications and information systems, which are unique skills that can be used in decision-making (Van Cleave, 2007). The US government may then make better decisions in pursuit of the laid specific strategies. The US government may find reliable information from the intelligence system. The government can penetrate the information from the National Counterintelligence Strategic Plan and enact effective security countermeasures.

Conclusion

Through the provided plan, the US government may collaborate with other colleagues from the national counterintelligence team to protect vital national assets (Van Cleave, 2007). These assets include sensitive technology, resources, knowledge, networks, and infrastructure. Through the protection of these resources, the US government may find a better realization of the specific objectives as the systems can be controlled from sophisticated attack. The government may also understand the planners and who is carrying out the attacks or even preparing to do so to parry them before the threat is realized. The government may also identify the targets of interest to the country's adversaries

References

Chapper, J. R. (2011). Worldwide threat assessment of the US intelligence community. Office of the Director of National Intelligence Washington DC.

Eggers, W. D. (2007). Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.

Negroponte, J. D. (2007). Annual threat assessment of the director of national intelligence. Washington, DC, January, 11.

Van Cleave, M. K. (2007). Counterintelligence and national strategy. National Defense Univ Washington DC School for National Security Executive Education.