Introduction
Gender equality is one of the most critical aspects of the law. Many nations prosecute against the acts done to demean a particular gender. It promotes the development of any country since anyone is allowed to work in any place as long as they are legally qualified. Concerning the above descriptions, this paper analyses the issue of gender prejudice, taking the sources from recommended texts and case studies.
Gender stereotype, according to Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR), is a generalization preconception or view about characteristics or attributes. It is the duties that should be or are performed or controlled by men and women. Sex generalization is destructive if it constrains the abilities of men and ladies to grow their capacities, follow their expert careers, and make decisions about their lives (Pasqualucci, 2012). As per the State, one of the essential factors that have led to circumstances of violence against ladies in Ciudad Juarez is the adjustment in family roles, because of ladies working. The State clarified that in Ciudad Juarez, the maquiladora business was set up in 1965 and extended in 1993 with the North American Free Trade Agreement (Pasqualucci, 2012).
It demonstrated that by offering inclination to contracting women, the maquiladora ventures caused changes in ladies' working lives that likewise affected their family lives. It was because women were turning into the family unit providers and forgetting their traditional roles. The State saw this as the reason that prompted into clashes inside the family since women started to be depicted as increasingly financially independent and competitive (Huneeus, 2011). The State referred to the CEDAW report, showing a change has not joined the social change in ladies roles in customarily male-centric frames of mind and mindsets (Huneeus, 2011). In this way, the stereotyped perspective on people's social functions has been propagated.
The report of the IACHR Rapporteur shows that the inhumane treatment against ladies in Ciudad Juarez case has its basis in ideas of the inferiority of ladies (Celorio, 2010). In turn, CEDA witnessed that sex-based brutality, including the disappearances, homicides, kidnappings, and the aggressive behaviour at home are not episodic, sporadic or isolated instances of violence. Instead, they speak to an essential circumstance, culture phenomenon and a social profoundly established in traditions and mentalities (Celorio, 2010). These circumstances of viciousness are created in a culture of brutality and separation.
References
Celorio, R. M. (2010). The Rights of Women in the Inter-American System of Human Rights: Current Opportunities and Challenges in Standard-Setting. U. Miami L. Rev., 65, 819.
Huneeus, A. (2011). Courts resisting courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court's struggle to enforce human rights. Cornell Int'l LJ, 44, 493.
Pasqualucci, J. M. (2012). The practice and procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Cite this page
Essay Sample on Gender Equality: Breaking Gender Prejudice and Stereotypes. (2023, Feb 13). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-sample-on-gender-equality-breaking-gender-prejudice-and-stereotypes
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Poverty Among Children in Uganda: Annotated Bibliography
- Economic Class Status Effect to Success Essay Example
- Essay Sample on Freedom In Speech
- Alcohol Abuse Including Binge Drinking - Essay Sample
- Essay Example on Community Policing: 4 Elements to Empower Communities
- Essay Example on Women and Christianity: A Historical Perspective
- Paper Example on Female Muslim Patient Refusal: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Hospital Care